Enhancing clinical core competencies in postgraduate medical education: A comparative study of augmented reality-assisted and traditional teaching approaches.

IF 2
Wanzhi Chen, Jian Wang, Shuihong Lei, Rong Xie, Meijun Zhong
{"title":"Enhancing clinical core competencies in postgraduate medical education: A comparative study of augmented reality-assisted and traditional teaching approaches.","authors":"Wanzhi Chen, Jian Wang, Shuihong Lei, Rong Xie, Meijun Zhong","doi":"10.1177/10815589261460889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR)-assisted teaching versus traditional methods in enhancing clinical core competencies among postgraduate medical students. Fifty postgraduate medical students were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (AR-assisted teaching, <i>n</i> = 25) or a control group (traditional teaching, <i>n</i> = 25). Following an identical instructional curriculum, participants underwent objective theoretical and case analysis assessments, completed self-evaluation surveys, and responded to standardized teaching satisfaction questionnaires. Competency evaluations were based on the six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies: patient care, medical knowledge, system-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills. Students in the experimental group outperformed the control group in theoretical knowledge and case analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.05). They also reported significantly greater improvements in self-directed learning ability, learning efficiency, clinical reasoning, and concentration. The experimental group showed higher satisfaction across teaching dimensions, including spatial visualization, interactivity, curriculum design, and perceived learning outcomes. Additionally, scores across all six ACGME core competencies were significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). AR-assisted teaching offers significant advantages over traditional methods in medical education, leading to enhanced knowledge acquisition, clinical reasoning, learner engagement, and competency development, thereby providing a promising approach for advancing postgraduate clinical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":520677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","volume":" ","pages":"10815589261460889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589261460889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR)-assisted teaching versus traditional methods in enhancing clinical core competencies among postgraduate medical students. Fifty postgraduate medical students were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (AR-assisted teaching, n = 25) or a control group (traditional teaching, n = 25). Following an identical instructional curriculum, participants underwent objective theoretical and case analysis assessments, completed self-evaluation surveys, and responded to standardized teaching satisfaction questionnaires. Competency evaluations were based on the six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies: patient care, medical knowledge, system-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills. Students in the experimental group outperformed the control group in theoretical knowledge and case analysis (p < 0.05). They also reported significantly greater improvements in self-directed learning ability, learning efficiency, clinical reasoning, and concentration. The experimental group showed higher satisfaction across teaching dimensions, including spatial visualization, interactivity, curriculum design, and perceived learning outcomes. Additionally, scores across all six ACGME core competencies were significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). AR-assisted teaching offers significant advantages over traditional methods in medical education, leading to enhanced knowledge acquisition, clinical reasoning, learner engagement, and competency development, thereby providing a promising approach for advancing postgraduate clinical training.

增强研究生医学教育的临床核心能力:增强现实辅助与传统教学方法的比较研究。
本研究旨在比较增强现实(AR)辅助教学与传统教学方法在提高医学研究生临床核心能力方面的效果。50名医学研究生随机分为实验组(ar辅助教学,n = 25)和对照组(传统教学,n = 25)。在相同的教学课程中,参与者进行客观的理论和案例分析评估,完成自我评价调查,并回答标准化的教学满意度问卷。能力评估基于六个ACGME核心能力:患者护理、医学知识、基于系统的实践、基于实践的学习和改进、专业精神、人际和沟通技巧。实验组学生在理论知识和案例分析方面优于对照组(P < 0.05)。他们在自主学习能力、学习效率、临床推理和注意力方面也有了显著提高。实验组在空间可视化、互动性、课程设计和感知学习成果等教学维度上表现出更高的满意度。此外,实验组的ACGME六项核心能力得分均显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。与传统的医学教育方法相比,辅助教学具有显著的优势,可以增强知识获取、临床推理、学习者参与和能力发展,从而为推进研究生临床培训提供了一种有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书