Maria Ameel, Tiina Talja, Jaakko Varpula, Tessa Maguire, Michael Daffern, Sanna Blomqvist, Tella Lantta
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study of a Clinical Decision Support System Designed to Assess Risk for Aggression and Prevent Aggressive Behaviour","authors":"Maria Ameel, Tiina Talja, Jaakko Varpula, Tessa Maguire, Michael Daffern, Sanna Blomqvist, Tella Lantta","doi":"10.1111/inm.70281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The electronic Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression combined with the Aggression Prevention Protocol (eDASA+APP) is a clinical decision support system designed to prevent aggression, reduce coercive practices and promote proactive nursing interventions. It has previously been tested in forensic psychiatry in Australia. Adaptation and feasibility testing are required before implementation in new clinical and linguistic contexts. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of the Finnish version of the eDASA+APP using a mixed methods approach. The study took place in four Finnish mental health inpatient units. Nurses completed an online learning module and used the eDASA+APP for 2 weeks. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected on nursing documentation and feasibility. As a result, the eDASA+APP was perceived as easy to use and helpful in establishing a shared process and terminology for aggression prevention. Documentation of risk assessments and preventive interventions increased. The e-learning module was considered adequate. One unit caring for older adults found the risk assessment component less practical. The Finnish eDASA+APP appears feasible and beneficial, supporting a larger implementation in units with adult patients. However, the feasibility testing in older adult services is recommended. The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences checklist was followed in reporting this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70281","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The electronic Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression combined with the Aggression Prevention Protocol (eDASA+APP) is a clinical decision support system designed to prevent aggression, reduce coercive practices and promote proactive nursing interventions. It has previously been tested in forensic psychiatry in Australia. Adaptation and feasibility testing are required before implementation in new clinical and linguistic contexts. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of the Finnish version of the eDASA+APP using a mixed methods approach. The study took place in four Finnish mental health inpatient units. Nurses completed an online learning module and used the eDASA+APP for 2 weeks. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected on nursing documentation and feasibility. As a result, the eDASA+APP was perceived as easy to use and helpful in establishing a shared process and terminology for aggression prevention. Documentation of risk assessments and preventive interventions increased. The e-learning module was considered adequate. One unit caring for older adults found the risk assessment component less practical. The Finnish eDASA+APP appears feasible and beneficial, supporting a larger implementation in units with adult patients. However, the feasibility testing in older adult services is recommended. The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences checklist was followed in reporting this study.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research.
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues.
The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed.
Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.