A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study of a Clinical Decision Support System Designed to Assess Risk for Aggression and Prevent Aggressive Behaviour

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Maria Ameel, Tiina Talja, Jaakko Varpula, Tessa Maguire, Michael Daffern, Sanna Blomqvist, Tella Lantta
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study of a Clinical Decision Support System Designed to Assess Risk for Aggression and Prevent Aggressive Behaviour","authors":"Maria Ameel,&nbsp;Tiina Talja,&nbsp;Jaakko Varpula,&nbsp;Tessa Maguire,&nbsp;Michael Daffern,&nbsp;Sanna Blomqvist,&nbsp;Tella Lantta","doi":"10.1111/inm.70281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The electronic Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression combined with the Aggression Prevention Protocol (eDASA+APP) is a clinical decision support system designed to prevent aggression, reduce coercive practices and promote proactive nursing interventions. It has previously been tested in forensic psychiatry in Australia. Adaptation and feasibility testing are required before implementation in new clinical and linguistic contexts. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of the Finnish version of the eDASA+APP using a mixed methods approach. The study took place in four Finnish mental health inpatient units. Nurses completed an online learning module and used the eDASA+APP for 2 weeks. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected on nursing documentation and feasibility. As a result, the eDASA+APP was perceived as easy to use and helpful in establishing a shared process and terminology for aggression prevention. Documentation of risk assessments and preventive interventions increased. The e-learning module was considered adequate. One unit caring for older adults found the risk assessment component less practical. The Finnish eDASA+APP appears feasible and beneficial, supporting a larger implementation in units with adult patients. However, the feasibility testing in older adult services is recommended. The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation &amp; Health Sciences checklist was followed in reporting this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70281","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The electronic Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression combined with the Aggression Prevention Protocol (eDASA+APP) is a clinical decision support system designed to prevent aggression, reduce coercive practices and promote proactive nursing interventions. It has previously been tested in forensic psychiatry in Australia. Adaptation and feasibility testing are required before implementation in new clinical and linguistic contexts. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of the Finnish version of the eDASA+APP using a mixed methods approach. The study took place in four Finnish mental health inpatient units. Nurses completed an online learning module and used the eDASA+APP for 2 weeks. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected on nursing documentation and feasibility. As a result, the eDASA+APP was perceived as easy to use and helpful in establishing a shared process and terminology for aggression prevention. Documentation of risk assessments and preventive interventions increased. The e-learning module was considered adequate. One unit caring for older adults found the risk assessment component less practical. The Finnish eDASA+APP appears feasible and beneficial, supporting a larger implementation in units with adult patients. However, the feasibility testing in older adult services is recommended. The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences checklist was followed in reporting this study.

临床决策支持系统用于评估攻击风险和预防攻击行为的混合方法可行性研究。
情境攻击电子动态评估结合攻击预防协议(eDASA+APP)是一种临床决策支持系统,旨在预防攻击,减少胁迫行为,促进主动护理干预。它之前已经在澳大利亚的法医精神病学中进行了测试。在新的临床和语言环境中实施之前,需要进行适应性和可行性测试。本研究的目的是采用混合方法研究芬兰版eDASA+APP的可行性。这项研究在四个芬兰精神卫生住院单位进行。护士完成在线学习模块并使用eDASA+APP 2周。定量和定性资料收集护理文件和可行性。因此,eDASA+APP被认为易于使用,有助于建立一个共享的过程和术语,以防止侵略。增加了风险评估和预防性干预措施的文件记录。电子学习模块被认为是足够的。一个照顾老年人的单位发现风险评估部分不太实用。芬兰的eDASA+APP似乎是可行和有益的,支持在有成人患者的单位中更大范围的实施。然而,建议在老年人服务中进行可行性测试。本研究采用康复与健康科学综合报告方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书