Ramiro Manzano-Nunez, Diego A. Gomez, Elvira M. Triana, Rebeca Alcalá, Laura Repiso, Marcel Camino-i-Gibernau, Teresa Logroño, Monica Sanchez-Autet
{"title":"Venous Thromboembolism as a Forgotten Complication of Physical Restraint: A Scoping Review and Implications for Practice","authors":"Ramiro Manzano-Nunez, Diego A. Gomez, Elvira M. Triana, Rebeca Alcalá, Laura Repiso, Marcel Camino-i-Gibernau, Teresa Logroño, Monica Sanchez-Autet","doi":"10.1111/inm.70280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This scoping review explores and synthesizes the literature on thromboembolic events in physically restrained patients in mental healthcare settings, focusing on patient characteristics, associated risk factors, and treatment strategies. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, PubMed and Scopus were searched through September 2025 for studies reporting thromboembolic events in patients subjected to physical restraint in psychiatric settings. Two reviewers independently performed study selection and data extraction regarding patient profiles, restraint configurations, and preventive strategies. Evidence was synthesized descriptively without formal risk-of-bias assessment. Of 142 records identified, 20 studies (2001–2025) were included: 7 case reports, 3 case series, 6 case–control, and 4 cohort studies. Populations ranged from adolescents to older adults, primarily with schizophrenia or mood disorders. The incidence of thromboembolic events in cohort studies was 9% to 11%. Technical documentation was heterogeneous; 50% of studies did not report on the management of hydration, nutrition, or elimination. Six studies found an association between restraint and thromboembolic events, with prolonged duration most consistently implicated. Thromboprophylaxis was inconsistently described: 4 studies reported its use, 4 reported its absence, and 12 provided no information. Thromboembolic events are a preventable complication of physical restraint. Current evidence is limited by retrospective designs and fragmented reporting. Improving clinical safety requires standardized risk assessment and nursing-led somatic monitoring integrated with interdisciplinary support. Protocols tailored to these immobilization episodes are required to ensure behavioural stabilization does not compromise physiological safety.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This scoping review explores and synthesizes the literature on thromboembolic events in physically restrained patients in mental healthcare settings, focusing on patient characteristics, associated risk factors, and treatment strategies. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, PubMed and Scopus were searched through September 2025 for studies reporting thromboembolic events in patients subjected to physical restraint in psychiatric settings. Two reviewers independently performed study selection and data extraction regarding patient profiles, restraint configurations, and preventive strategies. Evidence was synthesized descriptively without formal risk-of-bias assessment. Of 142 records identified, 20 studies (2001–2025) were included: 7 case reports, 3 case series, 6 case–control, and 4 cohort studies. Populations ranged from adolescents to older adults, primarily with schizophrenia or mood disorders. The incidence of thromboembolic events in cohort studies was 9% to 11%. Technical documentation was heterogeneous; 50% of studies did not report on the management of hydration, nutrition, or elimination. Six studies found an association between restraint and thromboembolic events, with prolonged duration most consistently implicated. Thromboprophylaxis was inconsistently described: 4 studies reported its use, 4 reported its absence, and 12 provided no information. Thromboembolic events are a preventable complication of physical restraint. Current evidence is limited by retrospective designs and fragmented reporting. Improving clinical safety requires standardized risk assessment and nursing-led somatic monitoring integrated with interdisciplinary support. Protocols tailored to these immobilization episodes are required to ensure behavioural stabilization does not compromise physiological safety.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research.
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues.
The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed.
Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.