Navigating pain in chronic kidney disease: Overcoming inertia!

IF 0.7
Nada Sellami, Salah Saïed, Faïza Ben Messaoud, Soumaya Chargui, Ezzedine Abderrahim
{"title":"Navigating pain in chronic kidney disease: Overcoming inertia!","authors":"Nada Sellami, Salah Saïed, Faïza Ben Messaoud, Soumaya Chargui, Ezzedine Abderrahim","doi":"10.1684/ndt.2026.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite being one of the most common symptoms in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), pain management in this population is challenging for healthcare professionals. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 60 practicing Tunisian primary care physicians who agreed to complete a questionnaire developed using Google Forms and distributed via social media and specialized online pages over a two-week period. It revealed that 71% encountered difficulties initiating pain treatment for CKD patients due to knowledge gaps, fear of side effects, and limited access to nephrologists. Many doctors avoided prescribing maximum paracetamol doses, while 90% refrained from using NSAIDs due to concerns about long-term effects. For higher-level analgesics, 71% didn’t reach recommended doses due to fear of side effects. 55% didn’t seek a nephrologist’s opinion, with 39% deeming it unnecessary. One in four didn’t consult a specialist due to workload and location challenges. Our study provides novel insights by identifying, in the Tunisian context, the practical and cognitive determinants of this therapeutic inertia, an aspect that has been scarcely explored in the literature. It highlights the need for targeted strategies to improve clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94153,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","volume":"22 3","pages":"144-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrologie & therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ndt.2026.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being one of the most common symptoms in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), pain management in this population is challenging for healthcare professionals. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 60 practicing Tunisian primary care physicians who agreed to complete a questionnaire developed using Google Forms and distributed via social media and specialized online pages over a two-week period. It revealed that 71% encountered difficulties initiating pain treatment for CKD patients due to knowledge gaps, fear of side effects, and limited access to nephrologists. Many doctors avoided prescribing maximum paracetamol doses, while 90% refrained from using NSAIDs due to concerns about long-term effects. For higher-level analgesics, 71% didn’t reach recommended doses due to fear of side effects. 55% didn’t seek a nephrologist’s opinion, with 39% deeming it unnecessary. One in four didn’t consult a specialist due to workload and location challenges. Our study provides novel insights by identifying, in the Tunisian context, the practical and cognitive determinants of this therapeutic inertia, an aspect that has been scarcely explored in the literature. It highlights the need for targeted strategies to improve clinical practice.

慢性肾脏疾病的疼痛导航:克服惯性!
尽管疼痛是慢性肾病(CKD)患者最常见的症状之一,但这一人群的疼痛管理对医疗保健专业人员来说是具有挑战性的。我们对60名执业的突尼斯初级保健医生进行了横断面调查,他们同意完成一份使用谷歌表格编制的问卷,并在两周内通过社交媒体和专门的在线页面分发。调查显示,71%的CKD患者在开始疼痛治疗时遇到困难,原因是知识差距、对副作用的恐惧以及接触肾病专家的机会有限。许多医生避免开出最大剂量的扑热息痛,而90%的医生由于担心长期影响而避免使用非甾体抗炎药。对于高剂量镇痛药,由于担心副作用,71%的人没有达到推荐剂量。55%的人没有寻求肾病专家的意见,39%的人认为没有必要。四分之一的人由于工作量和地点的挑战而没有咨询专家。我们的研究提供了新颖的见解,通过识别,在突尼斯的背景下,这种治疗惯性的实践和认知决定因素,这方面在文献中很少探讨。它强调需要有针对性的战略,以改善临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书