Ensemble Learning to Categorize the Bethesda System of Reporting of Cervical Cytology.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Journal of Cytology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.4103/joc.joc_130_25
Pranab Dey
{"title":"Ensemble Learning to Categorize the Bethesda System of Reporting of Cervical Cytology.","authors":"Pranab Dey","doi":"10.4103/joc.joc_130_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To evaluate the performance of a soft-voting ensemble deep learning (DL) model incorporating five transfer learning (TL) architectures for categorizing cervical smears according to the Bethesda system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 259 cervical cytology cases processed by SurePath liquid-based cytology were included, yielding 1016 representative microphotographs. Images were divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and test (15%) sets. An ensemble model comprising VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, and MobileNetV2 was trained using TL with soft-voting integration. Diagnostic performance was assessed using standard metrics, including 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test set, the model correctly classified 27/31 negative for intraepithelial lesions and malignancy (NILM) images and 56/58 carcinoma images. For NILM, the sensitivity was 0.871 (95% CI: 0.72-0.95), specificity 0.977 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99), accuracy 0.956 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98), and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00). For carcinoma, the sensitivity was 0.966 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00), specificity 0.960 (95% CI: 0.87-0.99), accuracy 0.962 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), and AUROC 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). Intermediate categories demonstrated variable performance, with lower sensitivity for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (0.20), though the specificity remained high (1.00). Overall, AUROC values were high across all categories (0.93-0.99). Among all the models, the ensemble learning (EL) model had the best performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed EL approach demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and excellent discrimination for clinically critical categories such as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and carcinoma. This model highlights the potential of DL-based ensemble frameworks in improving the reliability of cervical cytology interpretation. Larger datasets and whole-slide image analysis may further refine the performance for intermediate-grade lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology","volume":"43 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13235997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_130_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To evaluate the performance of a soft-voting ensemble deep learning (DL) model incorporating five transfer learning (TL) architectures for categorizing cervical smears according to the Bethesda system.

Materials and methods: A total of 259 cervical cytology cases processed by SurePath liquid-based cytology were included, yielding 1016 representative microphotographs. Images were divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and test (15%) sets. An ensemble model comprising VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, and MobileNetV2 was trained using TL with soft-voting integration. Diagnostic performance was assessed using standard metrics, including 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: In the test set, the model correctly classified 27/31 negative for intraepithelial lesions and malignancy (NILM) images and 56/58 carcinoma images. For NILM, the sensitivity was 0.871 (95% CI: 0.72-0.95), specificity 0.977 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99), accuracy 0.956 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98), and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00). For carcinoma, the sensitivity was 0.966 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00), specificity 0.960 (95% CI: 0.87-0.99), accuracy 0.962 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), and AUROC 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). Intermediate categories demonstrated variable performance, with lower sensitivity for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (0.20), though the specificity remained high (1.00). Overall, AUROC values were high across all categories (0.93-0.99). Among all the models, the ensemble learning (EL) model had the best performance.

Conclusions: The proposed EL approach demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and excellent discrimination for clinically critical categories such as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and carcinoma. This model highlights the potential of DL-based ensemble frameworks in improving the reliability of cervical cytology interpretation. Larger datasets and whole-slide image analysis may further refine the performance for intermediate-grade lesions.

宫颈细胞学报告Bethesda系统的集成学习分类。
目的和目标:评估软投票集成深度学习(DL)模型的性能,该模型包含五种迁移学习(TL)架构,用于根据Bethesda系统对宫颈涂片进行分类。材料与方法:采用SurePath液基细胞学技术处理的宫颈细胞学病例259例,获得具有代表性的显微照片1016张。将图像分为训练集(70%)、验证集(15%)和测试集(15%)。使用TL和软投票集成对VGG16、ResNet50、InceptionV3、DenseNet121和MobileNetV2组成的集成模型进行了训练。使用标准指标评估诊断性能,包括95%置信区间(CI)。结果:在测试集中,该模型正确分类了27/31张上皮内病变和恶性肿瘤(NILM)阴性图像和56/58张癌图像。对于NILM,灵敏度为0.871 (95% CI: 0.72-0.95),特异性为0.977 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99),准确度为0.956 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98),受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00)。对于癌,敏感性为0.966 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00),特异性为0.960 (95% CI: 0.87-0.99),准确度为0.962 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), AUROC为0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00)。中间类别表现出不同的表现,对低级别鳞状上皮内病变的敏感性较低(0.20),尽管特异性仍然很高(1.00)。总体而言,所有类别的AUROC值都很高(0.93-0.99)。在所有模型中,集成学习(EL)模型表现最好。结论:本文提出的EL入路对高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)和癌等临床关键类别具有较高的诊断准确性和出色的鉴别能力。该模型突出了基于dl的集成框架在提高宫颈细胞学解释可靠性方面的潜力。更大的数据集和全幻灯片图像分析可以进一步改善中级病变的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cytology
Journal of Cytology MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cytology is the official Quarterly publication of the Indian Academy of Cytologists. It is in the 25th year of publication in the year 2008. The journal covers all aspects of diagnostic cytology, including fine needle aspiration cytology, gynecological and non-gynecological cytology. Articles on ancillary techniques, like cytochemistry, immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, molecular cytopathology, as applied to cytological material are also welcome. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书