{"title":"Ensemble Learning to Categorize the Bethesda System of Reporting of Cervical Cytology.","authors":"Pranab Dey","doi":"10.4103/joc.joc_130_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To evaluate the performance of a soft-voting ensemble deep learning (DL) model incorporating five transfer learning (TL) architectures for categorizing cervical smears according to the Bethesda system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 259 cervical cytology cases processed by SurePath liquid-based cytology were included, yielding 1016 representative microphotographs. Images were divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and test (15%) sets. An ensemble model comprising VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, and MobileNetV2 was trained using TL with soft-voting integration. Diagnostic performance was assessed using standard metrics, including 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test set, the model correctly classified 27/31 negative for intraepithelial lesions and malignancy (NILM) images and 56/58 carcinoma images. For NILM, the sensitivity was 0.871 (95% CI: 0.72-0.95), specificity 0.977 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99), accuracy 0.956 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98), and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00). For carcinoma, the sensitivity was 0.966 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00), specificity 0.960 (95% CI: 0.87-0.99), accuracy 0.962 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), and AUROC 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). Intermediate categories demonstrated variable performance, with lower sensitivity for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (0.20), though the specificity remained high (1.00). Overall, AUROC values were high across all categories (0.93-0.99). Among all the models, the ensemble learning (EL) model had the best performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed EL approach demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and excellent discrimination for clinically critical categories such as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and carcinoma. This model highlights the potential of DL-based ensemble frameworks in improving the reliability of cervical cytology interpretation. Larger datasets and whole-slide image analysis may further refine the performance for intermediate-grade lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology","volume":"43 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13235997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_130_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To evaluate the performance of a soft-voting ensemble deep learning (DL) model incorporating five transfer learning (TL) architectures for categorizing cervical smears according to the Bethesda system.
Materials and methods: A total of 259 cervical cytology cases processed by SurePath liquid-based cytology were included, yielding 1016 representative microphotographs. Images were divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and test (15%) sets. An ensemble model comprising VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, and MobileNetV2 was trained using TL with soft-voting integration. Diagnostic performance was assessed using standard metrics, including 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: In the test set, the model correctly classified 27/31 negative for intraepithelial lesions and malignancy (NILM) images and 56/58 carcinoma images. For NILM, the sensitivity was 0.871 (95% CI: 0.72-0.95), specificity 0.977 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99), accuracy 0.956 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98), and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00). For carcinoma, the sensitivity was 0.966 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00), specificity 0.960 (95% CI: 0.87-0.99), accuracy 0.962 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), and AUROC 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). Intermediate categories demonstrated variable performance, with lower sensitivity for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (0.20), though the specificity remained high (1.00). Overall, AUROC values were high across all categories (0.93-0.99). Among all the models, the ensemble learning (EL) model had the best performance.
Conclusions: The proposed EL approach demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and excellent discrimination for clinically critical categories such as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and carcinoma. This model highlights the potential of DL-based ensemble frameworks in improving the reliability of cervical cytology interpretation. Larger datasets and whole-slide image analysis may further refine the performance for intermediate-grade lesions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cytology is the official Quarterly publication of the Indian Academy of Cytologists. It is in the 25th year of publication in the year 2008. The journal covers all aspects of diagnostic cytology, including fine needle aspiration cytology, gynecological and non-gynecological cytology. Articles on ancillary techniques, like cytochemistry, immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, molecular cytopathology, as applied to cytological material are also welcome. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.