Interobserver Reproducibility of the IAC Yokohama System for Breast FNAC: A Multirater Kappa Agreement Study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Journal of Cytology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.4103/joc.joc_120_25
Savita Agarwal, Sunita Kumari Meena, Ruovinuo Sachu, Pinki Pandey, Beant Kaur, Siddique Anam Irfan Ahmad, Jyotika, Shraddha Tewari
{"title":"Interobserver Reproducibility of the IAC Yokohama System for Breast FNAC: A Multirater Kappa Agreement Study.","authors":"Savita Agarwal, Sunita Kumari Meena, Ruovinuo Sachu, Pinki Pandey, Beant Kaur, Siddique Anam Irfan Ahmad, Jyotika, Shraddha Tewari","doi":"10.4103/joc.joc_120_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Cytopathology (IAC YSRB) aims to standardize breast fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) reporting by categorizing cytologic findings into five diagnostic groups. IAC YSRB is widely adopted; however, its reproducibility among cytopathologists with varying experience, especially in intermediate categories, remains a concern.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the interobserver reproducibility of the IAC YSRB among four cytopathologists using archived breast FNAC cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 239 breast FNAC cases reported in 2022 at a tertiary care center. Four cytopathologists with 20, 14, 5, and 3 years of experience independently reviewed smears and assigned each case to one of five IAC YSRB diagnostic categories. Observers were blinded to prior diagnoses and one another's assessments. Interobserver agreement was analyzed using Fleiss' kappa (<i>κ</i>) and pairwise <i>κ</i> values, with category-wise and overall concordance calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall interobserver agreement was substantial (<i>κ</i> = 0.69). The highest agreement was observed for malignant (<i>κ</i> = 0.95) and benign (<i>κ</i> = 0.72) categories. Atypical (<i>κ</i> = 0.22) and suspicious (<i>κ</i> = 0.26) categories showed fair agreement. Pairwise comparisons revealed higher concordance between more experienced cytopathologists (<i>κ</i> = 0.80) than less experienced ones. Complete agreement among all four raters was achieved in 81% of cases. Disagreements were mainly concentrated in intermediate categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IAC YSRB shows good interobserver reproducibility in breast FNAC reporting, particularly in benign and malignant categories. Interpretive variability in intermediate categories highlights the need for training, standardization, and ancillary tools to improve reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology","volume":"43 1","pages":"17-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13235996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_120_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Cytopathology (IAC YSRB) aims to standardize breast fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) reporting by categorizing cytologic findings into five diagnostic groups. IAC YSRB is widely adopted; however, its reproducibility among cytopathologists with varying experience, especially in intermediate categories, remains a concern.

Objective: To assess the interobserver reproducibility of the IAC YSRB among four cytopathologists using archived breast FNAC cases.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 239 breast FNAC cases reported in 2022 at a tertiary care center. Four cytopathologists with 20, 14, 5, and 3 years of experience independently reviewed smears and assigned each case to one of five IAC YSRB diagnostic categories. Observers were blinded to prior diagnoses and one another's assessments. Interobserver agreement was analyzed using Fleiss' kappa (κ) and pairwise κ values, with category-wise and overall concordance calculated.

Results: Overall interobserver agreement was substantial (κ = 0.69). The highest agreement was observed for malignant (κ = 0.95) and benign (κ = 0.72) categories. Atypical (κ = 0.22) and suspicious (κ = 0.26) categories showed fair agreement. Pairwise comparisons revealed higher concordance between more experienced cytopathologists (κ = 0.80) than less experienced ones. Complete agreement among all four raters was achieved in 81% of cases. Disagreements were mainly concentrated in intermediate categories.

Conclusion: IAC YSRB shows good interobserver reproducibility in breast FNAC reporting, particularly in benign and malignant categories. Interpretive variability in intermediate categories highlights the need for training, standardization, and ancillary tools to improve reliability.

乳房FNAC的IAC横滨系统的观察者间再现性:一项多指标Kappa协议研究。
背景:国际细胞学学会横滨乳腺细针抽吸细胞病理学报告系统(IAC YSRB)旨在通过将细胞学发现分为五个诊断组来标准化乳腺细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)报告。IAC YSRB被广泛采用;然而,其可重复性在不同经验的细胞病理学家,特别是在中间类别,仍然是一个问题。目的:利用已存档的乳腺FNAC病例,评估4名细胞病理学家IAC YSRB在观察者间的可重复性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了一家三级保健中心于2022年报告的239例乳腺FNAC病例。4名分别拥有20、14、5和3 年经验的细胞病理学家独立审查了涂片,并将每个病例分配到IAC YSRB的5个诊断类别之一。观察者对先前的诊断和彼此的评估是不知情的。使用Fleiss kappa (κ)和成对κ值分析观察者间一致性,并计算类别一致性和总体一致性。结果:总体观察者间一致性显著(κ = 0.69)。在恶性(κ = 0.95)和良性(κ = 0.72)分类中,一致性最高。非典型分类(κ = 0.22)和可疑分类(κ = 0.26)具有较好的一致性。两两比较显示经验丰富的细胞病理学家的一致性高于经验不足的细胞病理学家(κ = 0.80)。在81%的病例中,所有四名评分者完全一致。分歧主要集中在中间类别。结论:IAC YSRB在乳腺FNAC报告中具有良好的观察者间再现性,特别是在良性和恶性分类中。中级分类的解释可变性强调了培训、标准化和辅助工具的必要性,以提高可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cytology
Journal of Cytology MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cytology is the official Quarterly publication of the Indian Academy of Cytologists. It is in the 25th year of publication in the year 2008. The journal covers all aspects of diagnostic cytology, including fine needle aspiration cytology, gynecological and non-gynecological cytology. Articles on ancillary techniques, like cytochemistry, immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, molecular cytopathology, as applied to cytological material are also welcome. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书