Psychometric evaluation of the Values Inventory: structural validity, internal consistency, and the integration with sleep value in a U.S. adult online sample.

IF 2
Frontiers in sleep Pub Date : 2026-05-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frsle.2026.1800391
Dustin Sherriff, Abby Woolley, Brandon Pattillo, Chongming Yang, Kara M Duraccio, Daniel B Kay
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the Values Inventory: structural validity, internal consistency, and the integration with sleep value in a U.S. adult online sample.","authors":"Dustin Sherriff, Abby Woolley, Brandon Pattillo, Chongming Yang, Kara M Duraccio, Daniel B Kay","doi":"10.3389/frsle.2026.1800391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personal values shape health behaviors, yet the role of sleep value within broader value systems remains unknown. This study aimed to validate the Values Inventory, a novel measure assessing individual life values, and examine how sleep value fits into broader these value orientations. An online sample of U.S. adults (<i>N</i> = 455) completed the Values Inventory and the Sleep Valuation Item Bank 2.0 (SVIB-2.0), along with demographic and sleep-related surveys. Exploratory factor mixture modeling and confirmatory factor analysis supported a five-factor structure of the Values Inventory: Health/Wellbeing, Fundamental Human Values, Social Status, Personal Accomplishment/Global Advancement, and Community/Belonging. Internal consistency was high across factors (ω ≥ 0.88). Structural equation modeling revealed significant associations between demographic characteristics and value endorsements. Sleep health, along with mental and physical health, formed the core of the Health/Wellbeing factor, supporting the common belief that sleep is a pillar of health. Age was significantly associated with higher valuing of Health/Wellbeing and Fundamental Human Values. Multivariate analysis of variances comparing Values Inventory factors across previously established sleep value profiles (Unconcerned, Appreciative, Devalue, Ambivalent Priority, and Concerned) revealed distinct value patterns. The Appreciative profile showed the highest valuation of Health/Wellbeing. The Ambivalent Priority profile showed the highest valuation of Social Status and Community/Belonging. Findings support the Values Inventory as a psychometrically sound tool for assessing individual value systems and highlight the complex role of sleep. These results suggest the need for future research determining whether aligning sleep health interventions with individuals' broader values may enhance effectiveness and relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73106,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sleep","volume":"5 ","pages":"1800391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13236613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2026.1800391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personal values shape health behaviors, yet the role of sleep value within broader value systems remains unknown. This study aimed to validate the Values Inventory, a novel measure assessing individual life values, and examine how sleep value fits into broader these value orientations. An online sample of U.S. adults (N = 455) completed the Values Inventory and the Sleep Valuation Item Bank 2.0 (SVIB-2.0), along with demographic and sleep-related surveys. Exploratory factor mixture modeling and confirmatory factor analysis supported a five-factor structure of the Values Inventory: Health/Wellbeing, Fundamental Human Values, Social Status, Personal Accomplishment/Global Advancement, and Community/Belonging. Internal consistency was high across factors (ω ≥ 0.88). Structural equation modeling revealed significant associations between demographic characteristics and value endorsements. Sleep health, along with mental and physical health, formed the core of the Health/Wellbeing factor, supporting the common belief that sleep is a pillar of health. Age was significantly associated with higher valuing of Health/Wellbeing and Fundamental Human Values. Multivariate analysis of variances comparing Values Inventory factors across previously established sleep value profiles (Unconcerned, Appreciative, Devalue, Ambivalent Priority, and Concerned) revealed distinct value patterns. The Appreciative profile showed the highest valuation of Health/Wellbeing. The Ambivalent Priority profile showed the highest valuation of Social Status and Community/Belonging. Findings support the Values Inventory as a psychometrically sound tool for assessing individual value systems and highlight the complex role of sleep. These results suggest the need for future research determining whether aligning sleep health interventions with individuals' broader values may enhance effectiveness and relevance.

价值量表的心理测量评估:结构效度、内部一致性,以及与美国成人在线样本睡眠价值的整合。
个人价值观塑造健康行为,但睡眠价值在更广泛的价值体系中的作用仍然未知。本研究旨在验证价值量表,这是一种评估个人生命价值的新方法,并研究睡眠价值如何适应更广泛的这些价值取向。美国成年人的在线样本(N = 455)完成了价值清单和睡眠评估项目库2.0 (SVIB-2.0),以及人口统计和睡眠相关的调查。探索性因子混合模型和验证性因子分析支持价值观量表的五因子结构:健康/幸福、人类基本价值观、社会地位、个人成就/全球进步和社区/归属感。各因素的内部一致性较高(ω≥0.88)。结构方程模型揭示了人口特征与价值认同之间的显著关联。睡眠健康,以及心理和身体健康,构成了健康/幸福因素的核心,支持了睡眠是健康支柱的普遍信念。年龄与对健康/幸福和基本人类价值观的重视程度显著相关。对先前建立的睡眠价值档案(不关心、欣赏、贬值、矛盾优先和关注)的价值清单因素进行方差比较的多变量分析揭示了不同的价值模式。欣赏型的人对健康/幸福的评价最高。“矛盾优先”的社会地位和社区/归属评价最高。研究结果支持价值观量表作为一种心理测量学上可靠的评估个人价值观系统的工具,并强调了睡眠的复杂作用。这些结果表明,未来需要进行研究,以确定将睡眠健康干预与个人更广泛的价值观结合起来是否可以提高有效性和相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书