Impact of Patient Race on Cataract Surgery Outcomes in a Safety Net Academic Medical Center.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ethnicity & Disease Pub Date : 2026-06-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.18865/EthnDis-2025-11
Alec Murphy, Zofia Hetman, Alex Ortiz, Sean White, Seongho Song, Lisa Kelly
{"title":"Impact of Patient Race on Cataract Surgery Outcomes in a Safety Net Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Alec Murphy, Zofia Hetman, Alex Ortiz, Sean White, Seongho Song, Lisa Kelly","doi":"10.18865/EthnDis-2025-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate the impact of race and specific social determinants of health, including income and insurance status, on visual acuity outcomes for cataract surgery in a Midwest safety net academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University of Cincinnati Eye Clinic, a safety net academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients or participants: </strong>Records of first-time unilateral cataract surgeries performed between January 2015 and August 2020 were analyzed, with comparisons between Black and White patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, <i>t</i> tests, analysis of variance, and linear regression models, with a significance threshold of α=.05.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), postoperative refractive error (cylinder and sphere), and prevalence of comorbid conditions such as glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black patients had lower median incomes (P=.0001), worse postoperative UCVA (P=.014, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .016, .147), higher postoperative cylinder (P=.003, 95% CI: .092, .454), more myopic postoperative sphere (P=.017, 95% CI: -.829, -.083), and higher rates of glaucoma (P=.001) and diabetic retinopathy (P=.001). Adjusting for confounders, race was not independently associated with postoperative UCVA (P=.342).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although Black patients demonstrated worse postoperative UCVA, these disparities were linked to comorbidities and social determinants of health rather than race itself. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing nonracial determinants for improving visual acuity outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50495,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Disease","volume":"36 1","pages":"8-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13241240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/EthnDis-2025-11","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Investigate the impact of race and specific social determinants of health, including income and insurance status, on visual acuity outcomes for cataract surgery in a Midwest safety net academic medical center.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: University of Cincinnati Eye Clinic, a safety net academic medical center.

Patients or participants: Records of first-time unilateral cataract surgeries performed between January 2015 and August 2020 were analyzed, with comparisons between Black and White patients.

Methods: Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, t tests, analysis of variance, and linear regression models, with a significance threshold of α=.05.

Main outcome measures: Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), postoperative refractive error (cylinder and sphere), and prevalence of comorbid conditions such as glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy.

Results: Black patients had lower median incomes (P=.0001), worse postoperative UCVA (P=.014, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .016, .147), higher postoperative cylinder (P=.003, 95% CI: .092, .454), more myopic postoperative sphere (P=.017, 95% CI: -.829, -.083), and higher rates of glaucoma (P=.001) and diabetic retinopathy (P=.001). Adjusting for confounders, race was not independently associated with postoperative UCVA (P=.342).

Conclusions: Although Black patients demonstrated worse postoperative UCVA, these disparities were linked to comorbidities and social determinants of health rather than race itself. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing nonracial determinants for improving visual acuity outcomes.

患者种族对安全网络学术医疗中心白内障手术结果的影响。
目的:调查种族和健康的特定社会决定因素,包括收入和保险状况,对中西部安全网络学术医疗中心白内障手术视力结果的影响。设计:回顾性图表回顾。环境:辛辛那提大学眼科诊所,一个安全的学术医疗中心。患者或参与者:分析2015年1月至2020年8月期间首次进行单侧白内障手术的记录,并对黑人和白人患者进行比较。方法:采用卡方检验、t检验、方差分析和线性回归模型进行统计学分析,显著性阈值为α= 0.05。主要观察指标:术后未矫正视力(UCVA),术后屈光不正(圆柱形和球形),以及青光眼和糖尿病视网膜病变等合并症的患病率。结果:黑人患者收入中位数较低(P= 0.0001),术后UCVA较差(P= 0.014, 95%可信区间[CI]:。016年,。147),术后椎体较高(P= 0.003, 95% CI:。092年,。454),术后更多的近视球(P= 0.017, 95% CI: - 0.829, - 0.083),青光眼(P= 0.001)和糖尿病视网膜病变(P= 0.001)的发生率更高。调整混杂因素后,种族与术后UCVA没有独立相关(P=.342)。结论:尽管黑人患者表现出更差的术后UCVA,但这些差异与合并症和健康的社会决定因素有关,而不是种族本身。这些发现强调了解决非种族决定因素对改善视力结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Disease
Ethnicity & Disease 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Disease is an international journal that exclusively publishes information on the causal and associative relationships in the etiology of common illnesses through the study of ethnic patterns of disease. Topics focus on: ethnic differentials in disease rates;impact of migration on health status; social and ethnic factors related to health care access and health; and metabolic epidemiology. A major priority of the journal is to provide a forum for exchange between the United States and the developing countries of Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书