Nathan Nguyen, Alexa R Lauinger, Anant Naik, Robert Liu, Yagiz Yolcu, Paul M Arnold
{"title":"Clinical Research for the Use of 7 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Spinal Pathologies: a Scoping Review.","authors":"Nathan Nguyen, Alexa R Lauinger, Anant Naik, Robert Liu, Yagiz Yolcu, Paul M Arnold","doi":"10.1007/s00062-026-01669-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 7 T (7T) offers higher signal-to-noise ratio and improved spatial resolution compared to lower magnetic field strengths such as 1.5T and 3T, which may improve lesion detection and anatomical visualization for spinal cord pathology. This review summarizes current techniques and achievements in 7T spinal imaging and outlines associated technical barriers and future directions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review in accordance with PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines was performed utilizing PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only studies related to 7T MRI of human subjects were included, after removing unrelated studies and those of non-human subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies were included. Current literature supports 7T's superior resolution and signal-to-noise ratio in comparison to 1.5T and 3T MRI. These studies reported improved lesion detection and staging in multiple sclerosis (MS), spinal cord injury (SCI), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, the implications of results are limited by small sample sizes, technical heterogeneity, and inconsistent outcome measures. Additionally, the use of 7T spinal imaging remains limited by radiofrequency coil design, susceptibility artifacts, physiological noise, lack of FDA-clearance for spinal indications, and an absence of standardized imaging protocols. Future research aims to address these limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spinal cord imaging at 7T is challenging due to technical constraints and higher susceptibility to artifacts as a result of physiological noise (respiration, swallowing, and bulk movement). However, early studies' results using 7T imaging support improved ability, compared to 3T, to provide enhanced visualization of fine anatomical structures, such as nerve roots, and to improve spinal cord lesion detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-026-01669-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 7 T (7T) offers higher signal-to-noise ratio and improved spatial resolution compared to lower magnetic field strengths such as 1.5T and 3T, which may improve lesion detection and anatomical visualization for spinal cord pathology. This review summarizes current techniques and achievements in 7T spinal imaging and outlines associated technical barriers and future directions.
Methods: A scoping review in accordance with PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines was performed utilizing PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only studies related to 7T MRI of human subjects were included, after removing unrelated studies and those of non-human subjects.
Results: Twenty-nine studies were included. Current literature supports 7T's superior resolution and signal-to-noise ratio in comparison to 1.5T and 3T MRI. These studies reported improved lesion detection and staging in multiple sclerosis (MS), spinal cord injury (SCI), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, the implications of results are limited by small sample sizes, technical heterogeneity, and inconsistent outcome measures. Additionally, the use of 7T spinal imaging remains limited by radiofrequency coil design, susceptibility artifacts, physiological noise, lack of FDA-clearance for spinal indications, and an absence of standardized imaging protocols. Future research aims to address these limitations.
Conclusion: Spinal cord imaging at 7T is challenging due to technical constraints and higher susceptibility to artifacts as a result of physiological noise (respiration, swallowing, and bulk movement). However, early studies' results using 7T imaging support improved ability, compared to 3T, to provide enhanced visualization of fine anatomical structures, such as nerve roots, and to improve spinal cord lesion detection.
目的:磁共振成像(MRI)在7 T (7T)下比1.5T和3T等较低磁场强度下具有更高的信噪比和更高的空间分辨率,可以提高脊髓病理的病变检测和解剖可视化。本文综述了目前7T脊柱成像的技术和成果,并概述了相关的技术障碍和未来发展方向。方法:利用PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,按照PRISMA扩展范围评价指南进行范围评价。剔除不相关研究和非人类研究后,仅纳入与人类受试者7T MRI相关的研究。结果:纳入29项研究。与1.5T和3T MRI相比,目前的文献支持7T具有更高的分辨率和信噪比。这些研究报告了多发性硬化症(MS)、脊髓损伤(SCI)和肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的病变检测和分期的改善;然而,结果的含义受到样本量小、技术异质性和结果测量不一致的限制。此外,7T脊柱成像的使用仍然受到射频线圈设计、敏感性伪影、生理噪声、缺乏fda对脊柱适应症的批准以及缺乏标准化成像方案的限制。未来的研究旨在解决这些限制。结论:由于技术限制和生理噪声(呼吸、吞咽和大体积运动)导致的伪影敏感性较高,7T脊髓成像具有挑战性。然而,早期研究结果表明,与3T相比,使用7T成像支持提高了精细解剖结构(如神经根)的可视化能力,并改善了脊髓病变的检测。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects.
The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.