Pathological Complete Response to Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma With Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus.
Takuto Tsuchiya, Go Kimura, Hayato Takeda, Jun Akatsuka, Hiroya Hasegawa, Yuka Toyama, Takashi Sakatani, Akira Shimizu, Ryuji Ohashi, Yukihiro Kondo
{"title":"Pathological Complete Response to Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma With Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus.","authors":"Takuto Tsuchiya, Go Kimura, Hayato Takeda, Jun Akatsuka, Hiroya Hasegawa, Yuka Toyama, Takashi Sakatani, Akira Shimizu, Ryuji Ohashi, Yukihiro Kondo","doi":"10.1002/iju5.70200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is a standard first-line regimen for advanced renal cell carcinoma; however, primary tumors often respond less favorably to this combination than to immune checkpoint inhibitor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor regimens, and pathological complete response is rare.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 78-year-old man presented with abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed a 91-mm right renal mass with a Neves level 3 inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. Needle biopsy confirmed clear cell renal cell carcinoma with diffuse programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and both the tumor proportion and combined positive scores were approximately 100%. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was administered. After 21 months, the primary tumor decreased in size by 68.1% and tumor thrombus regressed from level 3 to 1. Histopathological examination following radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy demonstrated a pathological complete response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diffuse programmed death-ligand 1 expression on pretreatment biopsy may have been associated with a favorable response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":52909,"journal":{"name":"IJU Case Reports","volume":"9 3","pages":"e70200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13239876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJU Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/iju5.70200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is a standard first-line regimen for advanced renal cell carcinoma; however, primary tumors often respond less favorably to this combination than to immune checkpoint inhibitor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor regimens, and pathological complete response is rare.
Case presentation: A 78-year-old man presented with abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed a 91-mm right renal mass with a Neves level 3 inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. Needle biopsy confirmed clear cell renal cell carcinoma with diffuse programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and both the tumor proportion and combined positive scores were approximately 100%. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was administered. After 21 months, the primary tumor decreased in size by 68.1% and tumor thrombus regressed from level 3 to 1. Histopathological examination following radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy demonstrated a pathological complete response.
Conclusion: Diffuse programmed death-ligand 1 expression on pretreatment biopsy may have been associated with a favorable response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab.