Outpatient antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in children: an observational study in Nepal.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Suraj Bhattarai, Ram Hari Chapagain, Rabin Thami, Jaya Dhungana, Biplav Ghimire, Satish Prasad Barnawal, Ramanandan Prasad Chaudhary, Ajit Rayamajhi
{"title":"Outpatient antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in children: an observational study in Nepal.","authors":"Suraj Bhattarai, Ram Hari Chapagain, Rabin Thami, Jaya Dhungana, Biplav Ghimire, Satish Prasad Barnawal, Ramanandan Prasad Chaudhary, Ajit Rayamajhi","doi":"10.1093/inthealth/ihag054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic challenges in children impact antibiotic decisions in low- and middle-income countries, contributing to the burden of antimicrobial resistance. This study assessed antibiotic use practices for childhood acute respiratory infections (ARI) in outpatient settings then compared findings between public and private facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in two paediatric hospitals of Nepal (one public, one private) between January and July 2022. The standard checklist for ARI case management, adapted from the World Health Organization quality assessment and improvement tool, was applied to observe randomly selected doctor-patient consultations in disguised form with prior consent and ethics approval. Descriptive statistics were used to determine differences between the two facilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 104 outpatient consultations assessed in two sites (52 cases each), the majority (76%) of ARI diagnoses complied with the national protocol for ARI management, and this practice was better in the private than the public facility (85% vs 67%, p=0.039). Antibiotics were prescribed in 64% of children (67/104), with no difference between facilities (p=0.838). Of these, just 9% of cases (6/67) were prescribed the first-line antibiotic (amoxicillin). The provider's decision to prescribe an antibiotic or not was inappropriate in 54% children (56/104), while among those who were prescribed an antibiotic, 81% (54/67) were prescribed the incorrect antibiotic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reports high rates of inappropriate antibiotic decisions and prescriptions for paediatric ARI in both public and private facilities, suggesting larger studies are needed to gauge the scope and need of antibiotic stewardship programmes targeted to the providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49060,"journal":{"name":"International Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihag054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic challenges in children impact antibiotic decisions in low- and middle-income countries, contributing to the burden of antimicrobial resistance. This study assessed antibiotic use practices for childhood acute respiratory infections (ARI) in outpatient settings then compared findings between public and private facilities.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in two paediatric hospitals of Nepal (one public, one private) between January and July 2022. The standard checklist for ARI case management, adapted from the World Health Organization quality assessment and improvement tool, was applied to observe randomly selected doctor-patient consultations in disguised form with prior consent and ethics approval. Descriptive statistics were used to determine differences between the two facilities.

Results: Of 104 outpatient consultations assessed in two sites (52 cases each), the majority (76%) of ARI diagnoses complied with the national protocol for ARI management, and this practice was better in the private than the public facility (85% vs 67%, p=0.039). Antibiotics were prescribed in 64% of children (67/104), with no difference between facilities (p=0.838). Of these, just 9% of cases (6/67) were prescribed the first-line antibiotic (amoxicillin). The provider's decision to prescribe an antibiotic or not was inappropriate in 54% children (56/104), while among those who were prescribed an antibiotic, 81% (54/67) were prescribed the incorrect antibiotic.

Conclusion: This study reports high rates of inappropriate antibiotic decisions and prescriptions for paediatric ARI in both public and private facilities, suggesting larger studies are needed to gauge the scope and need of antibiotic stewardship programmes targeted to the providers.

儿童急性呼吸道感染的门诊抗生素处方:尼泊尔的一项观察性研究
背景:儿童诊断方面的挑战影响低收入和中等收入国家的抗生素决策,造成抗微生物药物耐药性负担。本研究评估了门诊儿童急性呼吸道感染(ARI)的抗生素使用情况,然后比较了公立和私立机构的研究结果。方法:于2022年1月至7月在尼泊尔两家儿科医院(一所公立医院,一所私立医院)进行横断面观察性研究。采用改编自世界卫生组织质量评估和改进工具的急性呼吸道感染病例管理标准核对表,观察随机选择的经过事先同意和伦理批准的变相医患会诊。描述性统计用于确定两个设施之间的差异。结果:在两个站点(各52例)评估的104例门诊咨询中,大多数(76%)ARI诊断符合ARI管理的国家方案,并且私立机构的这种做法优于公立机构(85%对67%,p=0.039)。使用抗生素的儿童占64%(67/104),各机构间无差异(p=0.838)。其中,只有9%的病例(6/67)使用了一线抗生素(阿莫西林)。54%的儿童(56/104)对医生是否开抗生素的决定不恰当,而在开了抗生素的儿童中,81%(54/67)开错了抗生素。结论:本研究报告了在公共和私人设施中,儿科ARI的不适当抗生素决策和处方率很高,这表明需要进行更大规模的研究,以评估针对提供者的抗生素管理规划的范围和需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Health
International Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Health is an official journal of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It publishes original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of global health including the social and economic aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems research, policy and implementation, and the evaluation of disease control programmes and healthcare delivery solutions. It aims to stimulate scientific and policy debate and provide a forum for analysis and opinion sharing for individuals and organisations engaged in all areas of global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书