Micaela Mercado, Megan Emily Chavez, Chelsea Nolan, Lara Law, Sara Shuman, Laura Noll, Kristin Ferguson, Hannah McEntarffer, Raechel Livingston, Shana Ellis, Jessie Helmes, Klim Drobnyh, Kelsie King, Robert Wickham
{"title":"Implementing Temporary Financial Assistance for Homelessness Prevention: a CFIR-Guided Study of Provider Perspectives.","authors":"Micaela Mercado, Megan Emily Chavez, Chelsea Nolan, Lara Law, Sara Shuman, Laura Noll, Kristin Ferguson, Hannah McEntarffer, Raechel Livingston, Shana Ellis, Jessie Helmes, Klim Drobnyh, Kelsie King, Robert Wickham","doi":"10.1007/s11121-026-01937-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Housing insecurity is a growing public health concern with significant implications for efforts to prevent homelessness. Temporary financial assistance (TFA) is an upstream intervention designed to prevent homelessness by addressing urgent housing needs through flexible, short-term financial support. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study examined providers' perspectives on implementing TFA across nine Arizona organizations and explored how these determinants may inform the selection and measurement of implementation outcomes. Thirty-six participants participated in interviews or focus groups to share their experiences implementing TFA. Using deductive thematic analysis, findings highlight key internal and external barriers such as complex eligibility criteria, administrative burdens, and limited affordable housing that may have affected the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of TFA delivery. Facilitators included provider training, cross-sector partnerships, and strong vendor relationships that improved adoption and integration of TFA across service settings. Providers used a range of implementation strategies, including reimbursement systems, promise-to-pay arrangements, and tiered intake processes, to overcome systemic barriers and promote recipients' housing stability. Although funding constraints and contextual challenges limited sustainment, providers demonstrated a strong commitment to adapting implementation approaches to meet recipient needs. This study contributes to the growing evidence based on the practical application of implementation science in homelessness prevention, offering insights into how determinants of implementation can strengthen intervention delivery in diverse settings. Findings inform policy, research, and practice aimed at optimizing implementation outcomes for homelessness prevention interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":"937-946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-026-01937-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Housing insecurity is a growing public health concern with significant implications for efforts to prevent homelessness. Temporary financial assistance (TFA) is an upstream intervention designed to prevent homelessness by addressing urgent housing needs through flexible, short-term financial support. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study examined providers' perspectives on implementing TFA across nine Arizona organizations and explored how these determinants may inform the selection and measurement of implementation outcomes. Thirty-six participants participated in interviews or focus groups to share their experiences implementing TFA. Using deductive thematic analysis, findings highlight key internal and external barriers such as complex eligibility criteria, administrative burdens, and limited affordable housing that may have affected the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of TFA delivery. Facilitators included provider training, cross-sector partnerships, and strong vendor relationships that improved adoption and integration of TFA across service settings. Providers used a range of implementation strategies, including reimbursement systems, promise-to-pay arrangements, and tiered intake processes, to overcome systemic barriers and promote recipients' housing stability. Although funding constraints and contextual challenges limited sustainment, providers demonstrated a strong commitment to adapting implementation approaches to meet recipient needs. This study contributes to the growing evidence based on the practical application of implementation science in homelessness prevention, offering insights into how determinants of implementation can strengthen intervention delivery in diverse settings. Findings inform policy, research, and practice aimed at optimizing implementation outcomes for homelessness prevention interventions.
期刊介绍:
Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.