Implementing Temporary Financial Assistance for Homelessness Prevention: a CFIR-Guided Study of Provider Perspectives.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Prevention Science Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-08 DOI:10.1007/s11121-026-01937-9
Micaela Mercado, Megan Emily Chavez, Chelsea Nolan, Lara Law, Sara Shuman, Laura Noll, Kristin Ferguson, Hannah McEntarffer, Raechel Livingston, Shana Ellis, Jessie Helmes, Klim Drobnyh, Kelsie King, Robert Wickham
{"title":"Implementing Temporary Financial Assistance for Homelessness Prevention: a CFIR-Guided Study of Provider Perspectives.","authors":"Micaela Mercado, Megan Emily Chavez, Chelsea Nolan, Lara Law, Sara Shuman, Laura Noll, Kristin Ferguson, Hannah McEntarffer, Raechel Livingston, Shana Ellis, Jessie Helmes, Klim Drobnyh, Kelsie King, Robert Wickham","doi":"10.1007/s11121-026-01937-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Housing insecurity is a growing public health concern with significant implications for efforts to prevent homelessness. Temporary financial assistance (TFA) is an upstream intervention designed to prevent homelessness by addressing urgent housing needs through flexible, short-term financial support. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study examined providers' perspectives on implementing TFA across nine Arizona organizations and explored how these determinants may inform the selection and measurement of implementation outcomes. Thirty-six participants participated in interviews or focus groups to share their experiences implementing TFA. Using deductive thematic analysis, findings highlight key internal and external barriers such as complex eligibility criteria, administrative burdens, and limited affordable housing that may have affected the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of TFA delivery. Facilitators included provider training, cross-sector partnerships, and strong vendor relationships that improved adoption and integration of TFA across service settings. Providers used a range of implementation strategies, including reimbursement systems, promise-to-pay arrangements, and tiered intake processes, to overcome systemic barriers and promote recipients' housing stability. Although funding constraints and contextual challenges limited sustainment, providers demonstrated a strong commitment to adapting implementation approaches to meet recipient needs. This study contributes to the growing evidence based on the practical application of implementation science in homelessness prevention, offering insights into how determinants of implementation can strengthen intervention delivery in diverse settings. Findings inform policy, research, and practice aimed at optimizing implementation outcomes for homelessness prevention interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":"937-946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-026-01937-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Housing insecurity is a growing public health concern with significant implications for efforts to prevent homelessness. Temporary financial assistance (TFA) is an upstream intervention designed to prevent homelessness by addressing urgent housing needs through flexible, short-term financial support. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study examined providers' perspectives on implementing TFA across nine Arizona organizations and explored how these determinants may inform the selection and measurement of implementation outcomes. Thirty-six participants participated in interviews or focus groups to share their experiences implementing TFA. Using deductive thematic analysis, findings highlight key internal and external barriers such as complex eligibility criteria, administrative burdens, and limited affordable housing that may have affected the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of TFA delivery. Facilitators included provider training, cross-sector partnerships, and strong vendor relationships that improved adoption and integration of TFA across service settings. Providers used a range of implementation strategies, including reimbursement systems, promise-to-pay arrangements, and tiered intake processes, to overcome systemic barriers and promote recipients' housing stability. Although funding constraints and contextual challenges limited sustainment, providers demonstrated a strong commitment to adapting implementation approaches to meet recipient needs. This study contributes to the growing evidence based on the practical application of implementation science in homelessness prevention, offering insights into how determinants of implementation can strengthen intervention delivery in diverse settings. Findings inform policy, research, and practice aimed at optimizing implementation outcomes for homelessness prevention interventions.

为预防无家可归实施临时财政援助:一项由cfr指导的提供者观点研究。
住房不安全是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,对防止无家可归的努力具有重大影响。临时财政援助(TFA)是一项上游干预措施,旨在通过灵活的短期财政支持解决紧急住房需求,防止无家可归。在实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的指导下,本研究考察了提供者在亚利桑那州9个组织中实施TFA的观点,并探讨了这些决定因素如何为实施结果的选择和衡量提供信息。36名参与者参加了访谈或焦点小组,分享了他们实施TFA的经验。通过演绎主题分析,研究结果强调了可能影响TFA实施、实施和维持的关键内部和外部障碍,如复杂的资格标准、行政负担和有限的经济适用房。促进因素包括供应商培训、跨部门合作伙伴关系和强大的供应商关系,这些都改善了跨服务设置的TFA采用和集成。服务提供者采用了一系列实施策略,包括报销制度、承诺支付安排和分层接收流程,以克服系统性障碍,促进受助人的住房稳定性。尽管资金限制和环境挑战限制了可持续发展,但提供者表现出了调整实施方法以满足受援国需求的坚定承诺。这项研究为基于实施科学在无家可归预防中的实际应用的越来越多的证据做出了贡献,为实施决定因素如何在不同环境中加强干预提供了见解。调查结果为旨在优化无家可归预防干预措施实施结果的政策、研究和实践提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书