Post-ERCP Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients With Thrombocytopenia: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Comparative Analysis on TriNetX Health Research Database.

IF 1.6 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2026-05-20 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70418
Umar Hayat, Azhar Hussain, Hassam Ali, Karan J Yagnik, Pranav Patel, Ali A Siddiqui, Sumant Inamdar, Kamran Qureshi, Harshit S Khara, Bradley Confer, David L Diehl
{"title":"Post-ERCP Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients With Thrombocytopenia: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Comparative Analysis on TriNetX Health Research Database.","authors":"Umar Hayat, Azhar Hussain, Hassam Ali, Karan J Yagnik, Pranav Patel, Ali A Siddiqui, Sumant Inamdar, Kamran Qureshi, Harshit S Khara, Bradley Confer, David L Diehl","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cirrhosis have an increased risk of developing complications secondary to thrombocytopenia. This study aims to investigate post-ERCP outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis and concomitant low platelet count who undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis in a large, matched cohort with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the TriNetX research network. Patients aged 18 years or older with cirrhosis undergoing ERCP for choledocholithiasis were included. Cohorts were categorized by platelet count into mild or moderate thrombocytopenia groups, with 5097 patients in each cohort after propensity score matching, yielding a total of 10 194 patients. Univariate regression analysis was used to assess the primary outcome, namely, all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included post-ERCP bleeding, post-ERCP pancreatitis, need for blood transfusion, and other adverse events such as sepsis and acute kidney injury (AKI). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were then calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All-cause mortality [OR 1.54 (95% CI): (1.32-1.80)] and need for blood transfusion (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.17-1.61) were higher among patients with moderate thrombocytopenia. However, adverse events, including post-ERCP bleeding (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.3), post-ERCP pancreatitis (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-1.02), sepsis (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.93-1.16), and AKI (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.00-1.23), were statistically not significant between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cirrhotic population with moderate thrombocytopenia undergoing ERCP for choledocholithiasis experiences significantly worse outcomes compared to those with mild thrombocytopenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"10 5","pages":"e70418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13240326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with cirrhosis have an increased risk of developing complications secondary to thrombocytopenia. This study aims to investigate post-ERCP outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis and concomitant low platelet count who undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis in a large, matched cohort with cirrhosis.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the TriNetX research network. Patients aged 18 years or older with cirrhosis undergoing ERCP for choledocholithiasis were included. Cohorts were categorized by platelet count into mild or moderate thrombocytopenia groups, with 5097 patients in each cohort after propensity score matching, yielding a total of 10 194 patients. Univariate regression analysis was used to assess the primary outcome, namely, all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included post-ERCP bleeding, post-ERCP pancreatitis, need for blood transfusion, and other adverse events such as sepsis and acute kidney injury (AKI). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were then calculated.

Results: All-cause mortality [OR 1.54 (95% CI): (1.32-1.80)] and need for blood transfusion (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.17-1.61) were higher among patients with moderate thrombocytopenia. However, adverse events, including post-ERCP bleeding (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.3), post-ERCP pancreatitis (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-1.02), sepsis (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.93-1.16), and AKI (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.00-1.23), were statistically not significant between the two groups.

Conclusion: The cirrhotic population with moderate thrombocytopenia undergoing ERCP for choledocholithiasis experiences significantly worse outcomes compared to those with mild thrombocytopenia.

肝硬化伴血小板减少患者ercp后的预后:TriNetX健康研究数据库的倾向匹配回顾性比较分析
背景:肝硬化患者继发血小板减少并发症的风险增加。本研究旨在调查肝硬化合并低血小板患者在内窥镜逆行胆管胰胆管造影(ERCP)治疗胆总管结石后ERCP后的结果。方法:采用来自TriNetX研究网络的数据进行回顾性队列研究。年龄在18岁或以上的肝硬化患者接受ERCP治疗胆总管结石。按血小板计数将队列分为轻度或中度血小板减少组,倾向评分匹配后每组5097例,共10194例。单因素回归分析用于评估主要结局,即全因死亡率。次要结局包括ercp后出血、ercp后胰腺炎、需要输血和其他不良事件,如败血症和急性肾损伤(AKI)。然后计算优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果:中度血小板减少患者的全因死亡率[OR 1.54 (95% CI):(1.32-1.80)]和输血需求(OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.17-1.61)较高。然而,不良事件,包括ercp后出血(OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.3)、ercp后胰腺炎(OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-1.02)、脓毒症(OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.93-1.16)和AKI (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.00-1.23),两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:中度血小板减少的肝硬化患者接受ERCP治疗胆总管结石的结果明显比轻度血小板减少的患者差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书