Does Patient Experience Correlate With Overall Hospital Quality Ratings?

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2026-06-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735261457768
Samer Badr, Tarek Nahle, Shakibur Rahman, Amine Al Soueidy, Martha Stefaniak, Marisha Burden, Jean-Sebastien Rachoin
{"title":"Does Patient Experience Correlate With Overall Hospital Quality Ratings?","authors":"Samer Badr, Tarek Nahle, Shakibur Rahman, Amine Al Soueidy, Martha Stefaniak, Marisha Burden, Jean-Sebastien Rachoin","doi":"10.1177/23743735261457768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Publicly reported patient experience (PE) scores and overall hospital quality and safety ratings (QSR) increasingly influence consumers' healthcare choices and reimbursement, but their correlation remains unclear. We analyzed 2,384 adult US acute care hospitals' public data from Google® (Google), the Leapfrog Group® (Leapfrog), Hospital Compare<sup>®</sup> (HC), US News and World Report<sup>®</sup> (USN), and Healthgrades<sup>®</sup> (HG). We abstracted QSR from three sources (Leapfrog, HC, and USN) and PE from four sources (HC, USN, HG, and Google). We found significant differences in PE scores across QSR categories in Leapfrog and HC (Kruskal-Wallis Test, all P < 0.001) and between USN-ranked and non-ranked institutions (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.001), indicating better PE in hospitals with higher QSR scores. We performed a logistic regression that showed that some but not all QSR were independently associated with PE. In conclusion, our study adds to the evidence that PE and quality often, though not always, correlate.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"13 ","pages":"23743735261457768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13237466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735261457768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Publicly reported patient experience (PE) scores and overall hospital quality and safety ratings (QSR) increasingly influence consumers' healthcare choices and reimbursement, but their correlation remains unclear. We analyzed 2,384 adult US acute care hospitals' public data from Google® (Google), the Leapfrog Group® (Leapfrog), Hospital Compare® (HC), US News and World Report® (USN), and Healthgrades® (HG). We abstracted QSR from three sources (Leapfrog, HC, and USN) and PE from four sources (HC, USN, HG, and Google). We found significant differences in PE scores across QSR categories in Leapfrog and HC (Kruskal-Wallis Test, all P < 0.001) and between USN-ranked and non-ranked institutions (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.001), indicating better PE in hospitals with higher QSR scores. We performed a logistic regression that showed that some but not all QSR were independently associated with PE. In conclusion, our study adds to the evidence that PE and quality often, though not always, correlate.

患者体验与医院整体质量评级相关吗?
公开报告的患者体验(PE)评分和整体医院质量和安全评级(QSR)越来越多地影响消费者的医疗保健选择和报销,但它们之间的相关性尚不清楚。我们分析了来自谷歌®(谷歌)、Leapfrog Group®(Leapfrog)、Hospital Compare®(HC)、US News and World Report®(USN)和Healthgrades®(HG)的2384家美国成人急症护理医院的公开数据。我们从三个来源(Leapfrog、HC和USN)中提取了QSR,从四个来源(HC、USN、HG和谷歌)中提取了PE。我们发现,在Leapfrog和HC的QSR类别中,PE得分存在显著差异(Kruskal-Wallis检验,均P < 0.001),在usn排名机构和非排名机构之间存在显著差异(Mann-Whitney U检验,P < 0.001),表明QSR得分较高的医院PE得分更好。我们进行了逻辑回归,显示一些但不是所有的QSR与PE独立相关。总之,我们的研究增加了证据,证明体育锻炼和质量经常(尽管并非总是)相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书