Quality Indicators for the Care of People with Intellectual Disability in Family Medicine in Slovenia: A Modified Delphi Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ana Perdih, Davorina Petek
{"title":"Quality Indicators for the Care of People with Intellectual Disability in Family Medicine in Slovenia: A Modified Delphi Study.","authors":"Ana Perdih, Davorina Petek","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2026-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with intellectual disability (ID) experience poorer health outcomes and shorter life expectancy than the general population-gaps that could be mitigated by high-quality healthcare. In Slovenia, there are no specific recommendations for this population. The aim of this study was to identify and validate quality indicators (QIs) for the care of people with ID in family medicine, to serve as recommendations for this population in Slovenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi study was conducted with 15 national experts. An initial set of 44 indicators, derived from the literature, was presented, and panel members proposed eight additional indicators. In the first round, panel members rated the importance of each indicator. Based on feedback, the indicators were revised to separate importance from the implementation interval. In the second and third rounds, panel members rated importance and feasibility and selected the most appropriate time interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 indicators were validated. These indicators cover multiple aspects of healthcare, including lifestyle factors, lifestyle advice, clinical outcomes, ongoing care, preventive medicine, and administration. Of the original 44 indicators, 28 were confirmed (64%). Of the 8 indicators proposed by panel members, 5 were validated (62.5%). A total of 9 of the original indicators (20%) and 3 of the panel-proposed indicators (37.5%) were considered important but not feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This three-round Delphi study successfully developed QIs for the care of people with ID in Slovenia. These QIs can be integrated directly into existing system structures. The study provides a set of indicators that can inform the development of a clinical checklist and serve as a practical tool for evaluating both organisational and clinical aspects of quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":"65 2","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13236477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2026-0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People with intellectual disability (ID) experience poorer health outcomes and shorter life expectancy than the general population-gaps that could be mitigated by high-quality healthcare. In Slovenia, there are no specific recommendations for this population. The aim of this study was to identify and validate quality indicators (QIs) for the care of people with ID in family medicine, to serve as recommendations for this population in Slovenia.

Methods: A three-round Delphi study was conducted with 15 national experts. An initial set of 44 indicators, derived from the literature, was presented, and panel members proposed eight additional indicators. In the first round, panel members rated the importance of each indicator. Based on feedback, the indicators were revised to separate importance from the implementation interval. In the second and third rounds, panel members rated importance and feasibility and selected the most appropriate time interval.

Results: A total of 33 indicators were validated. These indicators cover multiple aspects of healthcare, including lifestyle factors, lifestyle advice, clinical outcomes, ongoing care, preventive medicine, and administration. Of the original 44 indicators, 28 were confirmed (64%). Of the 8 indicators proposed by panel members, 5 were validated (62.5%). A total of 9 of the original indicators (20%) and 3 of the panel-proposed indicators (37.5%) were considered important but not feasible.

Conclusions: This three-round Delphi study successfully developed QIs for the care of people with ID in Slovenia. These QIs can be integrated directly into existing system structures. The study provides a set of indicators that can inform the development of a clinical checklist and serve as a practical tool for evaluating both organisational and clinical aspects of quality of care.

斯洛文尼亚家庭医学中智障人士护理的质量指标:一项修正德尔菲研究。
与一般人群相比,智力残疾者(ID)的健康状况较差,预期寿命较短——高质量的医疗保健可以缓解这种差距。在斯洛文尼亚,没有针对这一人群的具体建议。本研究的目的是确定和验证家庭医学中ID患者护理的质量指标(QIs),作为斯洛文尼亚这一人群的建议。方法:对15名国家级专家进行三轮德尔菲调查。根据文献提出了一套最初的44个指标,小组成员还提出了8个附加指标。在第一轮中,小组成员对每个指标的重要性进行评级。根据反馈意见,对指标进行了修订,将重要性与实施间隔分开。在第二轮和第三轮,小组成员评估重要性和可行性,并选择最合适的时间间隔。结果:共验证了33项指标。这些指标涵盖了医疗保健的多个方面,包括生活方式因素、生活方式建议、临床结果、持续护理、预防医学和管理。在原来的44项指标中,确认了28项(64%)。在专家组成员提出的8项指标中,有5项(62.5%)得到验证。原来的指标中有9个(20%)和小组提出的指标中有3个(37.5%)被认为重要但不可行。结论:这个三轮德尔菲研究成功地开发了斯洛文尼亚ID患者护理的QIs。这些qa可以直接集成到现有的系统结构中。该研究提供了一套指标,可以为临床检查表的制定提供信息,并作为评估护理质量的组织和临床方面的实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书