Gender inequities in patterns of authorship contributions in dentistry: an observational study.

Revista Cientifica Odontologica Pub Date : 2026-04-04 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.21142/2523-2754-1402-2026-288
Laura Barreto Moreno, Cristina Helena Morello Sartori, Sarah Arangurem Karam, Marcos Britto Correa, Françoise Hélène van de Sande, Anelise Fernandes Montagner
{"title":"Gender inequities in patterns of authorship contributions in dentistry: an observational study.","authors":"Laura Barreto Moreno, Cristina Helena Morello Sartori, Sarah Arangurem Karam, Marcos Britto Correa, Françoise Hélène van de Sande, Anelise Fernandes Montagner","doi":"10.21142/2523-2754-1402-2026-288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This observational study investigated gender differences in authorship contributions in high-impact, multidisciplinary dentistry journals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A sample of 396 articles published between January 1 and December 31, 2023, across the five high-impact multidisciplinary journals in the dentistry field was analyzed. The selection of journals considered the impact factor in the Journal Citation Reports 2023 in the dentistry field. It includes the five dental multidisciplinary journals with the highest impact factor, considering journals with multidisciplinary dentistry subjects. Journals with a specific focus on dental areas or multidisciplinary journals covering the same area were excluded. The binary gender of the first and last authors was identified using the Genderize database, and contribution roles were extracted from the authors' statements. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men were the majority in both first (57.1%) and last (65.7%) authorship positions. Among first authors, significant gender differences were found: women were more involved in data collection (53.9% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.001) and more likely to contribute to all five authorship categories (p = 0.04). No significant gender differences were observed among the last authors. Geographical variation was noted, with South America showing a higher proportion of women as first authors (64.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the study reveals gender disparities in the distribution of scientific labor, particularly in the position of first authorship, and highlights the need for greater equity and transparency in recognizing research contributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":33326,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cientifica Odontologica","volume":"14 2","pages":"e288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13238283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cientifica Odontologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21142/2523-2754-1402-2026-288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This observational study investigated gender differences in authorship contributions in high-impact, multidisciplinary dentistry journals.

Material and methods: A sample of 396 articles published between January 1 and December 31, 2023, across the five high-impact multidisciplinary journals in the dentistry field was analyzed. The selection of journals considered the impact factor in the Journal Citation Reports 2023 in the dentistry field. It includes the five dental multidisciplinary journals with the highest impact factor, considering journals with multidisciplinary dentistry subjects. Journals with a specific focus on dental areas or multidisciplinary journals covering the same area were excluded. The binary gender of the first and last authors was identified using the Genderize database, and contribution roles were extracted from the authors' statements. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-squared tests.

Results: Men were the majority in both first (57.1%) and last (65.7%) authorship positions. Among first authors, significant gender differences were found: women were more involved in data collection (53.9% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.001) and more likely to contribute to all five authorship categories (p = 0.04). No significant gender differences were observed among the last authors. Geographical variation was noted, with South America showing a higher proportion of women as first authors (64.4%).

Conclusion: Overall, the study reveals gender disparities in the distribution of scientific labor, particularly in the position of first authorship, and highlights the need for greater equity and transparency in recognizing research contributions.

性别不平等的作者贡献模式在牙科:一项观察性研究。
目的:本观察性研究调查了高影响力、多学科牙科期刊作者贡献的性别差异。材料和方法:对2023年1月1日至12月31日期间发表在牙科领域5种高影响力多学科期刊上的396篇文章进行样本分析。期刊的选择考虑了2023年期刊引用报告在牙科领域的影响因子。它包括影响因子最高的五个牙科多学科期刊,考虑到多学科牙科学科的期刊。专门关注牙科领域的期刊或涵盖同一领域的多学科期刊被排除在外。使用Genderize数据库确定第一作者和最后作者的二元性别,并从作者的陈述中提取贡献角色。数据分析包括描述性统计和Pearson卡方检验。结果:男性在第一作者(57.1%)和最后作者(65.7%)中均占多数。在第一作者中,发现了显著的性别差异:女性更多地参与数据收集(53.9%对46.1%,p = 0.001),并且更有可能贡献所有五个作者类别(p = 0.04)。在最近的作者中没有观察到显著的性别差异。注意到地理差异,南美洲女性作为第一作者的比例较高(64.4%)。结论:总体而言,该研究揭示了科学劳动分布中的性别差异,特别是在第一作者职位上,并强调了在承认研究贡献方面需要更大的公平和透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书