{"title":"Zero-shot performance of a general-purpose vision-language model for pediatric appendicitis diagnosis.","authors":"Ceren Altintas Mese, Ismail Mese, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli","doi":"10.1007/s00247-026-06687-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General-purpose vision-language models can analyze medical images without task-specific training, but their value for pediatric abdominal ultrasound is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the zero-shot performance of a general-purpose vision-language model to diagnose pediatric appendicitis using multimodal inputs, including images, report text, and clinical information.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, diagnostic capabilities of Llama 4 Maverick were evaluated on the Regensburg Pediatric Appendicitis Dataset. Five experiments were conducted using the following inputs as well as input combinations: images only, ultrasound report text only, images and ultrasound text, images and clinical data, entire multimodal input. Reference standard of appendicitis was defined based on histopathology in patients who underwent surgical resection and on clinical follow-up in patients managed conservatively. Performance was assessed at the patient level using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1-score. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was evaluated secondarily as a measure of discrimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 782 patients, 294 met inclusion criteria; based on data availability, four experiments are conducted using 293 patients and in the fifth experiment, 284. Images-only experiment showed very low specificity (13.5%) and had the poorest discrimination (AUROC, 0.567). Ultrasound report text improved classification performance, with specificity increasing to 63.5% while maintaining high sensitivity; discrimination was also strong (AUROC, 0.883). Adding images to ultrasound text or combining all available inputs did not yield further meaningful improvement. Differences between images-only experiment and text-containing experiments were statistically significant (P≤0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zero-shot visual interpretation of pediatric abdominal ultrasound by a general-purpose vision-language model is inadequate for safe appendicitis diagnosis. Performance is driven primarily by a structured sonographic imaging report, supporting a role for such models as text-based decision support tools rather than autonomous ultrasound image interpreters.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2478-2487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-026-06687-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: General-purpose vision-language models can analyze medical images without task-specific training, but their value for pediatric abdominal ultrasound is unknown.
Objective: To investigate the zero-shot performance of a general-purpose vision-language model to diagnose pediatric appendicitis using multimodal inputs, including images, report text, and clinical information.
Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, diagnostic capabilities of Llama 4 Maverick were evaluated on the Regensburg Pediatric Appendicitis Dataset. Five experiments were conducted using the following inputs as well as input combinations: images only, ultrasound report text only, images and ultrasound text, images and clinical data, entire multimodal input. Reference standard of appendicitis was defined based on histopathology in patients who underwent surgical resection and on clinical follow-up in patients managed conservatively. Performance was assessed at the patient level using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1-score. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was evaluated secondarily as a measure of discrimination.
Results: Of 782 patients, 294 met inclusion criteria; based on data availability, four experiments are conducted using 293 patients and in the fifth experiment, 284. Images-only experiment showed very low specificity (13.5%) and had the poorest discrimination (AUROC, 0.567). Ultrasound report text improved classification performance, with specificity increasing to 63.5% while maintaining high sensitivity; discrimination was also strong (AUROC, 0.883). Adding images to ultrasound text or combining all available inputs did not yield further meaningful improvement. Differences between images-only experiment and text-containing experiments were statistically significant (P≤0.002).
Conclusion: Zero-shot visual interpretation of pediatric abdominal ultrasound by a general-purpose vision-language model is inadequate for safe appendicitis diagnosis. Performance is driven primarily by a structured sonographic imaging report, supporting a role for such models as text-based decision support tools rather than autonomous ultrasound image interpreters.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.