Zero-shot performance of a general-purpose vision-language model for pediatric appendicitis diagnosis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-08 DOI:10.1007/s00247-026-06687-y
Ceren Altintas Mese, Ismail Mese, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli
{"title":"Zero-shot performance of a general-purpose vision-language model for pediatric appendicitis diagnosis.","authors":"Ceren Altintas Mese, Ismail Mese, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli","doi":"10.1007/s00247-026-06687-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General-purpose vision-language models can analyze medical images without task-specific training, but their value for pediatric abdominal ultrasound is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the zero-shot performance of a general-purpose vision-language model to diagnose pediatric appendicitis using multimodal inputs, including images, report text, and clinical information.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, diagnostic capabilities of Llama 4 Maverick were evaluated on the Regensburg Pediatric Appendicitis Dataset. Five experiments were conducted using the following inputs as well as input combinations: images only, ultrasound report text only, images and ultrasound text, images and clinical data, entire multimodal input. Reference standard of appendicitis was defined based on histopathology in patients who underwent surgical resection and on clinical follow-up in patients managed conservatively. Performance was assessed at the patient level using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1-score. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was evaluated secondarily as a measure of discrimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 782 patients, 294 met inclusion criteria; based on data availability, four experiments are conducted using 293 patients and in the fifth experiment, 284. Images-only experiment showed very low specificity (13.5%) and had the poorest discrimination (AUROC, 0.567). Ultrasound report text improved classification performance, with specificity increasing to 63.5% while maintaining high sensitivity; discrimination was also strong (AUROC, 0.883). Adding images to ultrasound text or combining all available inputs did not yield further meaningful improvement. Differences between images-only experiment and text-containing experiments were statistically significant (P≤0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zero-shot visual interpretation of pediatric abdominal ultrasound by a general-purpose vision-language model is inadequate for safe appendicitis diagnosis. Performance is driven primarily by a structured sonographic imaging report, supporting a role for such models as text-based decision support tools rather than autonomous ultrasound image interpreters.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2478-2487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-026-06687-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General-purpose vision-language models can analyze medical images without task-specific training, but their value for pediatric abdominal ultrasound is unknown.

Objective: To investigate the zero-shot performance of a general-purpose vision-language model to diagnose pediatric appendicitis using multimodal inputs, including images, report text, and clinical information.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, diagnostic capabilities of Llama 4 Maverick were evaluated on the Regensburg Pediatric Appendicitis Dataset. Five experiments were conducted using the following inputs as well as input combinations: images only, ultrasound report text only, images and ultrasound text, images and clinical data, entire multimodal input. Reference standard of appendicitis was defined based on histopathology in patients who underwent surgical resection and on clinical follow-up in patients managed conservatively. Performance was assessed at the patient level using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1-score. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was evaluated secondarily as a measure of discrimination.

Results: Of 782 patients, 294 met inclusion criteria; based on data availability, four experiments are conducted using 293 patients and in the fifth experiment, 284. Images-only experiment showed very low specificity (13.5%) and had the poorest discrimination (AUROC, 0.567). Ultrasound report text improved classification performance, with specificity increasing to 63.5% while maintaining high sensitivity; discrimination was also strong (AUROC, 0.883). Adding images to ultrasound text or combining all available inputs did not yield further meaningful improvement. Differences between images-only experiment and text-containing experiments were statistically significant (P≤0.002).

Conclusion: Zero-shot visual interpretation of pediatric abdominal ultrasound by a general-purpose vision-language model is inadequate for safe appendicitis diagnosis. Performance is driven primarily by a structured sonographic imaging report, supporting a role for such models as text-based decision support tools rather than autonomous ultrasound image interpreters.

用于小儿阑尾炎诊断的通用视觉语言模型的零射击性能。
背景:通用的视觉语言模型可以在没有特定任务训练的情况下分析医学图像,但它们对儿科腹部超声的价值尚不清楚。目的:探讨基于多模态输入(包括图像、报告文本和临床信息)的通用视觉语言模型诊断小儿阑尾炎的零射击性能。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,在雷根斯堡儿童阑尾炎数据集上评估羊驼4 Maverick的诊断能力。实验采用纯图像输入、纯超声报告文本输入、图像与超声文本输入、图像与临床数据输入、全多模态输入五种输入方式及输入组合。阑尾炎的参考标准是根据手术切除患者的组织病理学和保守治疗患者的临床随访来确定的。在患者水平上使用准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和f1评分来评估性能。其次评价受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)作为判别的指标。结果:782例患者中,294例符合纳入标准;在数据可用性的基础上,共进行了4次实验,共293例患者,第5次实验共284例患者。单纯图像实验的特异性很低(13.5%),辨别能力最差(AUROC, 0.567)。超声报告文本提高了分类性能,在保持高灵敏度的同时,特异性提高到63.5%;歧视也很强(AUROC, 0.883)。将图像添加到超声文本中或将所有可用的输入组合在一起都不会产生进一步的有意义的改善。纯图像实验与含文字实验差异有统计学意义(P≤0.002)。结论:应用通用的视觉语言模型对儿童腹部超声进行零镜头视觉判读不足以对阑尾炎进行安全诊断。性能主要由结构化超声成像报告驱动,支持基于文本的决策支持工具等模型的作用,而不是自主超声图像解释器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书