Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Dictionary Matching to Advance Reliability of Quantitative MRI.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-07 DOI:10.1002/mrm.70459
Brian Toner, Ute Goerke, Eze Ahanonu, Kevin Johnson, Vibhas Deshpande, Holden H Wu, Maria I Altbach, Ali Bilgin
{"title":"Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Dictionary Matching to Advance Reliability of Quantitative MRI.","authors":"Brian Toner, Ute Goerke, Eze Ahanonu, Kevin Johnson, Vibhas Deshpande, Holden H Wu, Maria I Altbach, Ali Bilgin","doi":"10.1002/mrm.70459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Purpose: Dictionary matching is a standard tool in quantitative MRI (qMRI), but typically lacks uncertainty quantification (UQ). This is critical when advanced reconstructions (e.g., compressed sensing, deep learning) introduce complex-valued, spatially varying, and temporally correlated noise that violates standard assumptions of independent and identically distributed (iid) noise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two voxel-wise uncertainty methods: a frequentist Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) and a Bayesian marginal posterior approach, are introduced. Noise is modeled as spatially varying and temporally correlated using the covariance estimated from background regions. Methods were validated via simulations and phantom experiments using radial turbo spin-echo ( <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> mapping) and radial Look-Locker ( <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> mapping). In vivo experiments characterized uncertainty under varying acceleration factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulations confirmed both methods achieve nominal coverage rates (e.g., 95% intervals containing the true value 95% of the time) where standard iid assumptions fail. Phantom results showed excellent agreement with gold-standard spin-echo references. In vivo experiments highlighted that higher acceleration factors widen uncertainty intervals for <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> and <math> <mrow> <msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> . The LRT method proved more computationally efficient than the Bayesian approach while providing comparable interval estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A robust framework is presented for UQ in dictionary-matched qMRI. By modeling the non-iid noise inherent in modern reconstructions, these methods provide statistically interpretable UQ that assesses the reliability of parameter maps in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1956-1971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13419121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Purpose: Dictionary matching is a standard tool in quantitative MRI (qMRI), but typically lacks uncertainty quantification (UQ). This is critical when advanced reconstructions (e.g., compressed sensing, deep learning) introduce complex-valued, spatially varying, and temporally correlated noise that violates standard assumptions of independent and identically distributed (iid) noise.

Methods: Two voxel-wise uncertainty methods: a frequentist Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) and a Bayesian marginal posterior approach, are introduced. Noise is modeled as spatially varying and temporally correlated using the covariance estimated from background regions. Methods were validated via simulations and phantom experiments using radial turbo spin-echo ( T 2 mapping) and radial Look-Locker ( T 1 mapping). In vivo experiments characterized uncertainty under varying acceleration factors.

Results: Simulations confirmed both methods achieve nominal coverage rates (e.g., 95% intervals containing the true value 95% of the time) where standard iid assumptions fail. Phantom results showed excellent agreement with gold-standard spin-echo references. In vivo experiments highlighted that higher acceleration factors widen uncertainty intervals for T 1 and T 2 . The LRT method proved more computationally efficient than the Bayesian approach while providing comparable interval estimates.

Conclusion: A robust framework is presented for UQ in dictionary-matched qMRI. By modeling the non-iid noise inherent in modern reconstructions, these methods provide statistically interpretable UQ that assesses the reliability of parameter maps in clinical settings.

字典匹配中的不确定度量化方法提高定量MRI的可靠性。
目的:字典匹配是定量MRI (qMRI)的标准工具,但通常缺乏不确定度量化(UQ)。当高级重建(例如压缩感知、深度学习)引入复杂值、空间变化和时间相关的噪声时,这一点至关重要,这些噪声违反了独立和同分布(iid)噪声的标准假设。方法:介绍了两种体素不确定性方法:频率似然比检验(LRT)和贝叶斯边际后验方法。噪声建模为空间变化和时间相关,使用从背景区域估计的协方差。通过径向涡轮自旋回波(t2 $$ {T}_2 $$映射)和径向Look-Locker (t1 $$ {T}_1 $$映射)的模拟和模拟实验验证了方法。体内实验在不同的加速度因素下具有不确定性。结果:模拟证实两种方法都达到了名义覆盖率(例如,95%)% intervals containing the true value 95% of the time) where standard iid assumptions fail. Phantom results showed excellent agreement with gold-standard spin-echo references. In vivo experiments highlighted that higher acceleration factors widen uncertainty intervals for T 1 $$ {T}_1 $$ and T 2 $$ {T}_2 $$ . The LRT method proved more computationally efficient than the Bayesian approach while providing comparable interval estimates.Conclusion: A robust framework is presented for UQ in dictionary-matched qMRI. By modeling the non-iid noise inherent in modern reconstructions, these methods provide statistically interpretable UQ that assesses the reliability of parameter maps in clinical settings.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书