Infections associated with peripheral venous catheters: A scoping review.

IF 1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Camila Piuco Preve, Luis Gustavo Sampaio, Fernanda Klagenberg Arenhardt, Murilo Martini, Maria Helena Rigatto
{"title":"Infections associated with peripheral venous catheters: A scoping review.","authors":"Camila Piuco Preve, Luis Gustavo Sampaio, Fernanda Klagenberg Arenhardt, Murilo Martini, Maria Helena Rigatto","doi":"10.1177/17571774261456666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) are widely used vascular access devices and can cause significant adverse events, including bloodstream infections (BSIs).</p><p><strong>Aim/objectives: </strong>To map the scientific literature on PVC-BSI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review including 67 studies, from MEDLINE/PubMed, SciELO, EMBASE, and LILACS/BIREME, was conducted, synthesizing data on incidence rates, microbiology, risk factors, preventive strategies, and economic burden.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>PVC-BSI incidence shows marked geographic and clinical variation, with rates ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 cases per 1,000 catheter-days in high-income countries, contrasting with significantly higher averages in developing regions such as Latin America (2.06) and the Middle East (2.32). Effective preventive strategies included staff education, bundle implementation, active surveillance, multimodal interventions, chlorhexidine-alcohol skin antisepsis, and use of innovative devices. <i>Staphylococcus spp.</i> accounted for 20% to 70.7% of infections, but the proportion of Gram-negative bacilli might be increasing. Identified risk factors included the insertion site (hand punctures were protective), parenteral nutrition, catheter gauge (larger than 16G), and material contamination. Only one study addressed costs, estimating an additional expenditure exceeding €5,000 per infected patient.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although less frequent than central venous catheter infections, PVC-related bloodstream infections represent an important public health concern due to their widespread use. Incidence is likely underestimated because of limited reporting and variable diagnostic criteria. Standardized definitions, systematic surveillance, continued professional training, and more research-especially in low- and middle-income settings-are needed to improve prevention and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"17571774261456666"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13233604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774261456666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) are widely used vascular access devices and can cause significant adverse events, including bloodstream infections (BSIs).

Aim/objectives: To map the scientific literature on PVC-BSI.

Methods: A scoping review including 67 studies, from MEDLINE/PubMed, SciELO, EMBASE, and LILACS/BIREME, was conducted, synthesizing data on incidence rates, microbiology, risk factors, preventive strategies, and economic burden.

Findings/results: PVC-BSI incidence shows marked geographic and clinical variation, with rates ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 cases per 1,000 catheter-days in high-income countries, contrasting with significantly higher averages in developing regions such as Latin America (2.06) and the Middle East (2.32). Effective preventive strategies included staff education, bundle implementation, active surveillance, multimodal interventions, chlorhexidine-alcohol skin antisepsis, and use of innovative devices. Staphylococcus spp. accounted for 20% to 70.7% of infections, but the proportion of Gram-negative bacilli might be increasing. Identified risk factors included the insertion site (hand punctures were protective), parenteral nutrition, catheter gauge (larger than 16G), and material contamination. Only one study addressed costs, estimating an additional expenditure exceeding €5,000 per infected patient.

Discussion: Although less frequent than central venous catheter infections, PVC-related bloodstream infections represent an important public health concern due to their widespread use. Incidence is likely underestimated because of limited reporting and variable diagnostic criteria. Standardized definitions, systematic surveillance, continued professional training, and more research-especially in low- and middle-income settings-are needed to improve prevention and management.

与外周静脉导管相关的感染:范围审查。
背景:外周静脉导管(PVCs)是广泛使用的血管通路装置,可引起严重的不良事件,包括血流感染(bsi)。目的/目标:绘制关于PVC-BSI的科学文献。方法:对来自MEDLINE/PubMed、SciELO、EMBASE和LILACS/BIREME的67项研究进行范围综述,综合发病率、微生物学、危险因素、预防策略和经济负担等数据。发现/结果:PVC-BSI的发病率显示出明显的地理和临床差异,高收入国家的发生率为每1000个导管日0.1至0.5例,而发展中地区的平均值则明显更高,如拉丁美洲(2.06例)和中东(2.32例)。有效的预防战略包括对工作人员进行教育、捆绑实施、主动监测、多模式干预、氯己定-酒精皮肤消毒和使用创新设备。葡萄球菌感染占20% ~ 70.7%,但革兰氏阴性杆菌的比例可能在增加。确定的危险因素包括插入部位(手穿刺具有保护作用)、肠外营养、导管规(大于16G)和材料污染。只有一项研究涉及成本问题,估计每名受感染患者的额外支出超过5000欧元。讨论:虽然比中心静脉导管感染发生率低,但pvc相关血流感染由于其广泛使用而成为一个重要的公共卫生问题。由于报告有限和诊断标准不一,发病率可能被低估。需要标准化的定义、系统的监测、持续的专业培训和更多的研究——特别是在低收入和中等收入环境中——来改进预防和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书