Factors Associated With Unexpected Movement During Transcranial Electrical Stimulation-Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring for Neurosurgical and Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Propensity-weighted Study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Shoto Yamada, Tomohiro Chaki, Yusuke Kimura, Yuki Gotoh, Sangnyon Kim, Yasuhiro Takahashi, Kengo Hayamizu, Nobuhiro Mikuni, Michiaki Yamakage
{"title":"Factors Associated With Unexpected Movement During Transcranial Electrical Stimulation-Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring for Neurosurgical and Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Propensity-weighted Study.","authors":"Shoto Yamada, Tomohiro Chaki, Yusuke Kimura, Yuki Gotoh, Sangnyon Kim, Yasuhiro Takahashi, Kengo Hayamizu, Nobuhiro Mikuni, Michiaki Yamakage","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transcranial electrical stimulation-motor evoked potential (TES-MEP) is used during neurosurgical procedures to assess motor pathway integrity. TES-MEP-associated unexpected movement may compromise surgical precision and anesthetic management. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of unexpected movements and compare neuroendovascular procedures (NE) versus conventional neurosurgery (CV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing TES-MEP monitoring. The primary outcome was the occurrence of TES-MEP-associated unexpected movements. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with unexpected movements. Sensitivity and bootstrap analyses were performed to confirm the stability of findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 252 patients (NE: 63, 25.0%; CV: 189, 75.0%) were included. Overall, unexpected movements occurred in 20 patients (7.9%), with a higher incidence in the NE group (n = 11, 17.5%) compared with the CV group (n = 9, 4.8%). After IPTW adjustment, covariate balance was achieved between the two groups, and NE remained associated with higher odds of movements (weighted OR: 3.78, 95% CI: 1.23 to 11.64). Multivariable analysis showed that earlier MEP initiation and higher total charge per stimulation were independently associated with increased odds of unexpected movements (OR: 0.96 per minute delay, 95% CI: 0.93 to 0.99; OR: 1.04 per µC/phase, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TES-MEP-associated unexpected movements were more frequent during NE procedures. Procedural timing and total stimulation charge, rather than patient baseline characteristics, were associated with the odds of movement. Future studies should investigate potential interventions to reduce unexpected movements, such as the optimization of MEP stimulation parameters and initiation timing, to enhance intraoperative safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transcranial electrical stimulation-motor evoked potential (TES-MEP) is used during neurosurgical procedures to assess motor pathway integrity. TES-MEP-associated unexpected movement may compromise surgical precision and anesthetic management. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of unexpected movements and compare neuroendovascular procedures (NE) versus conventional neurosurgery (CV).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing TES-MEP monitoring. The primary outcome was the occurrence of TES-MEP-associated unexpected movements. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with unexpected movements. Sensitivity and bootstrap analyses were performed to confirm the stability of findings.

Results: A total of 252 patients (NE: 63, 25.0%; CV: 189, 75.0%) were included. Overall, unexpected movements occurred in 20 patients (7.9%), with a higher incidence in the NE group (n = 11, 17.5%) compared with the CV group (n = 9, 4.8%). After IPTW adjustment, covariate balance was achieved between the two groups, and NE remained associated with higher odds of movements (weighted OR: 3.78, 95% CI: 1.23 to 11.64). Multivariable analysis showed that earlier MEP initiation and higher total charge per stimulation were independently associated with increased odds of unexpected movements (OR: 0.96 per minute delay, 95% CI: 0.93 to 0.99; OR: 1.04 per µC/phase, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06), respectively.

Conclusion: TES-MEP-associated unexpected movements were more frequent during NE procedures. Procedural timing and total stimulation charge, rather than patient baseline characteristics, were associated with the odds of movement. Future studies should investigate potential interventions to reduce unexpected movements, such as the optimization of MEP stimulation parameters and initiation timing, to enhance intraoperative safety.

神经外科和神经血管内手术经颅电刺激-运动诱发电位监测过程中与意外运动相关的因素:一项倾向加权研究。
简介:经颅电刺激-运动诱发电位(TES-MEP)在神经外科手术中用于评估运动通路的完整性。es - mep相关的意外运动可能会影响手术的精确性和麻醉管理。本研究旨在评估意外运动的发生率,并比较神经血管内手术(NE)与传统神经外科手术(CV)。方法:我们对接受TES-MEP监测的患者进行回顾性观察研究。主要结局是tes - mep相关的意外运动的发生。应用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来调整基线差异。多变量逻辑回归用于识别与意外运动相关的因素。进行敏感性和自举分析以确认结果的稳定性。结果:共纳入252例患者(NE: 63, 25.0%; CV: 189, 75.0%)。总体而言,20例患者(7.9%)发生了意外运动,NE组(n = 11, 17.5%)的发生率高于CV组(n = 9, 4.8%)。在IPTW调整后,两组间的协变量达到平衡,NE仍然与较高的运动几率相关(加权OR: 3.78, 95% CI: 1.23至11.64)。多变量分析显示,更早的MEP启动和更高的每次刺激总电荷与意外运动的几率增加分别独立相关(OR: 0.96 /分钟延迟,95% CI: 0.93至0.99;OR: 1.04 /µC/phase, 95% CI: 1.03至1.06)。结论:es - mep相关的意外运动在NE过程中更为频繁。与运动几率相关的是手术时机和总刺激电荷,而不是患者的基线特征。未来的研究应探讨减少意外运动的潜在干预措施,如优化MEP刺激参数和启动时间,以提高术中安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书