Lymph node ratio as an independent predictor of survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Insights from a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Ana María Colino-Gallardo, María Jesús Fernández-Aceñero, Jesús Vega-González, Montserrat De La Torre-Serrano, María Pilar Díaz-Suárez, Luis Ortega-Medina, Luis Ignacio Diez-Valladares, Javier Martínez-Useros
{"title":"Lymph node ratio as an independent predictor of survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Insights from a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ana María Colino-Gallardo, María Jesús Fernández-Aceñero, Jesús Vega-González, Montserrat De La Torre-Serrano, María Pilar Díaz-Suárez, Luis Ortega-Medina, Luis Ignacio Diez-Valladares, Javier Martínez-Useros","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqag037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the prognostic impact of lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a retrospective cohort of 214 patients who had undergone surgical resection between 2000 and 2022), LNY was dichotomized at the median (≤13 vs >13 nodes). The LNR was categorized as 0, 0.01 to 0.20, and greater than 0.20. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier/log rank and multivariable Cox regression; node-negative category (N0) sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LNY was not significantly associated with differences in DFS (14 vs 15 months; P = .72) or OS (18 vs 26 months; P = .27), although N0 patients showed a trend toward longer OS with higher LNY (22 vs 36 months; P = .087). The LNR statistically significantly separated DFS (19 vs 10 vs 12 months; P = .003) and OS (28 vs 20 vs 18 months; P = .045). In Cox models, an LNY below 13 was protective for DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.633; P = .03) and borderline for OS (HR, 0.705; P = .07). Compared with an LNR of 0, an LNR of 0.01 to 0.20 or greater than 0.20 independently predicted recurrence (HR, 1.921; P = .006 and HR, 1.745; P = .02); for OS, only an LNR greater than 0.20 remained significant (HR, 1.752; P = .01). A higher LNR was associated with lymphovascular/perineural invasion and progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic marker after resection that predicts recurrence and-when above 0.20-mortality, whereas LNY mainly reflects staging adequacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":"165 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqag037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the prognostic impact of lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Methods: Using a retrospective cohort of 214 patients who had undergone surgical resection between 2000 and 2022), LNY was dichotomized at the median (≤13 vs >13 nodes). The LNR was categorized as 0, 0.01 to 0.20, and greater than 0.20. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier/log rank and multivariable Cox regression; node-negative category (N0) sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: The LNY was not significantly associated with differences in DFS (14 vs 15 months; P = .72) or OS (18 vs 26 months; P = .27), although N0 patients showed a trend toward longer OS with higher LNY (22 vs 36 months; P = .087). The LNR statistically significantly separated DFS (19 vs 10 vs 12 months; P = .003) and OS (28 vs 20 vs 18 months; P = .045). In Cox models, an LNY below 13 was protective for DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.633; P = .03) and borderline for OS (HR, 0.705; P = .07). Compared with an LNR of 0, an LNR of 0.01 to 0.20 or greater than 0.20 independently predicted recurrence (HR, 1.921; P = .006 and HR, 1.745; P = .02); for OS, only an LNR greater than 0.20 remained significant (HR, 1.752; P = .01). A higher LNR was associated with lymphovascular/perineural invasion and progression.

Conclusions: Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic marker after resection that predicts recurrence and-when above 0.20-mortality, whereas LNY mainly reflects staging adequacy.

淋巴结比例作为胰腺腺癌生存的独立预测因子:来自回顾性队列研究的见解。
目的:我们评估淋巴结生成量(LNY)和淋巴结比例(LNR)对胰腺腺癌切除术后无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的预后影响。方法:对2000年至2022年期间接受手术切除的214例患者进行回顾性队列研究,以中位数(≤13 vs bbb13)对LNY进行二分类。LNR分为0、0.01 ~ 0.20和大于0.20。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier/log秩和多变量Cox回归;进行节点阴性分类(N0)敏感性分析。结果:LNY与DFS(14个月vs 15个月;P = 0.72)或OS(18个月vs 26个月;P = 0.27)的差异无显著相关性,尽管0例患者表现出更高LNY的更长的OS趋势(22个月vs 36个月;P = 0.087)。LNR对DFS(19个月vs 10个月vs 12个月;P = 0.003)和OS(28个月vs 20个月vs 18个月;P = 0.045)的差异有统计学意义。在Cox模型中,LNY低于13对DFS有保护作用(风险比[HR], 0.633;03)和OS的临界值(HR, 0.705; P = .07)。与LNR为0相比,LNR为0.01 ~ 0.20或大于0.20独立预测复发(HR为1.921;P =。006, HR为1.745;p = .02);对于OS,只有LNR大于0.20仍然显著(HR, 1.752; P = 0.01)。较高的LNR与淋巴血管/神经周围的侵袭和进展有关。结论:淋巴结比例是术后独立的预后指标,预测复发和0.20以上死亡率,而淋巴结比例主要反映分期是否适当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书