Durian-Shell-Inspired Biostructures for Energy Absorption and Impact Protection

IF 4.4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bin Xu, Wenjun Bai
{"title":"Durian-Shell-Inspired Biostructures for Energy Absorption and Impact Protection","authors":"Bin Xu,&nbsp;Wenjun Bai","doi":"10.1007/s42235-026-00881-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study presents a novel bionic thin-walled tube with a complex cross-section (BS), inspired by the protective thorns of the durian fruit, to enhance crashworthiness and impact protection. The spiky durian shell dissipates impact energy and shields non-impact regions, motivating the biomimetic design. Quasi-static compression tests demonstrate that BS5 achieves a 9% higher Specific Energy Absorption (SEA) than Sinusoidal corrugated tubes (SIN) and 22% higher than Double Corrugated Tapered tubes (DT). The three BS configurations also exhibit 31–60% higher Crushing Force Efficiency (CFE) while reducing Undulation of Load-carrying Capacity (ULC) by 26–74%, resulting in smoother force–displacement responses. Bulkheads provide no advantage in axial energy absorption; in fact, BS5 without bulkhead achieves a 33% higher SEA. Structures with polygonal mid-sections show lower imperfection sensitivity than square ones, and when the side length-to-thickness ratio is preserved, larger-scale structures retain stable absorption efficiency, indicating potential for protective applications such as shelters. By integrating two antiprism units, BS5 delivers 45% higher SEA, 71% higher CFE, and 35% lower ULC than a single antiprism tube. A calibrated linear elastic constitutive model accurately predicts crushing behavior under quasi-static loading. Unlike SIN and DT double-layer structures that collapse in thick-walled modes, deformation analysis reveals that double-layer BSs possess an optimal interlayer spacing to avoid such degeneration, exhibit a more complex plastic hinge evolution mechanism and higher energy absorption efficiency. Low-velocity drop-weight tests confirm superior impact resistance of BSs compared with SIN and DT, while high-velocity simulations reveal only a 21% increase in Initial Peak Crushing Force (IPCF) from 5 to 50 m/s, demonstrating robust dynamic performance. Overall, the durian-inspired BS tubes exhibit excellent crashworthiness and strong potential for advanced defense and engineering impact protection applications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","volume":"23 3","pages":"1697 - 1718"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42235-026-00881-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a novel bionic thin-walled tube with a complex cross-section (BS), inspired by the protective thorns of the durian fruit, to enhance crashworthiness and impact protection. The spiky durian shell dissipates impact energy and shields non-impact regions, motivating the biomimetic design. Quasi-static compression tests demonstrate that BS5 achieves a 9% higher Specific Energy Absorption (SEA) than Sinusoidal corrugated tubes (SIN) and 22% higher than Double Corrugated Tapered tubes (DT). The three BS configurations also exhibit 31–60% higher Crushing Force Efficiency (CFE) while reducing Undulation of Load-carrying Capacity (ULC) by 26–74%, resulting in smoother force–displacement responses. Bulkheads provide no advantage in axial energy absorption; in fact, BS5 without bulkhead achieves a 33% higher SEA. Structures with polygonal mid-sections show lower imperfection sensitivity than square ones, and when the side length-to-thickness ratio is preserved, larger-scale structures retain stable absorption efficiency, indicating potential for protective applications such as shelters. By integrating two antiprism units, BS5 delivers 45% higher SEA, 71% higher CFE, and 35% lower ULC than a single antiprism tube. A calibrated linear elastic constitutive model accurately predicts crushing behavior under quasi-static loading. Unlike SIN and DT double-layer structures that collapse in thick-walled modes, deformation analysis reveals that double-layer BSs possess an optimal interlayer spacing to avoid such degeneration, exhibit a more complex plastic hinge evolution mechanism and higher energy absorption efficiency. Low-velocity drop-weight tests confirm superior impact resistance of BSs compared with SIN and DT, while high-velocity simulations reveal only a 21% increase in Initial Peak Crushing Force (IPCF) from 5 to 50 m/s, demonstrating robust dynamic performance. Overall, the durian-inspired BS tubes exhibit excellent crashworthiness and strong potential for advanced defense and engineering impact protection applications.

Abstract Image

榴莲壳启发的能量吸收和冲击防护生物结构
本研究提出了一种新型的仿生薄壁管,具有复杂的横截面(BS),灵感来自榴莲果实的保护刺,以提高耐撞性和冲击保护。尖尖的榴莲壳可以消散冲击能量,并保护非冲击区域,从而激发了仿生设计。准静态压缩试验表明,BS5的比能吸收(SEA)比正弦波纹管(SIN)高9%,比双波纹锥形管(DT)高22%。三种BS构型的破碎力效率(CFE)提高了31-60%,承载能力(ULC)波动降低了26-74%,力-位移响应更平滑。舱壁在轴向能量吸收方面没有优势;事实上,没有舱壁的BS5的SEA要高出33%。与方形结构相比,多边形中部结构的缺陷敏感性较低,并且在保持边长厚比的情况下,更大规模的结构保持稳定的吸收效率,这表明在遮蔽等防护应用方面的潜力。通过集成两个反棱镜管,BS5的SEA比单个反棱镜管高45%,CFE高71%,ULC低35%。校准后的线弹性本构模型准确地预测了准静态载荷下的破碎行为。与SIN和DT双层结构在厚壁模式下崩溃不同,变形分析表明,双层BSs具有避免这种退化的最佳层间距,具有更复杂的塑性铰演化机制和更高的能量吸收效率。低速落重测试证实,与SIN和DT相比,BSs具有更强的抗冲击性,而高速模拟显示,初始峰值破碎力(IPCF)从5米/秒增加到50米/秒,仅增加了21%,显示出强大的动态性能。总的来说,榴莲启发的BS管表现出出色的耐撞性和强大的潜力,用于先进的国防和工程冲击保护应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bionic Engineering
Journal of Bionic Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
162
审稿时长
10.0 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bionic Engineering (JBE) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers and reviews that apply the knowledge learned from nature and biological systems to solve concrete engineering problems. The topics that JBE covers include but are not limited to: Mechanisms, kinematical mechanics and control of animal locomotion, development of mobile robots with walking (running and crawling), swimming or flying abilities inspired by animal locomotion. Structures, morphologies, composition and physical properties of natural and biomaterials; fabrication of new materials mimicking the properties and functions of natural and biomaterials. Biomedical materials, artificial organs and tissue engineering for medical applications; rehabilitation equipment and devices. Development of bioinspired computation methods and artificial intelligence for engineering applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书