{"title":"Electromyography-Based Force Estimation in Static and Dynamic Human–Robot Interaction","authors":"Nattawit Jullawat, Apidet Booranawong, Hiroshi Saito, Pornchai Phukpattaranont","doi":"10.1007/s42235-026-00871-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a force estimation system for the X and Y axes based on surface electromyography (sEMG) signals acquired from eight channels of the Myo armband. The ground truth forces were recorded using an ATI 6-axis force sensor in two degrees of freedom (2-DOF) setup. The proposed system aims to estimate both static directional forces (X+, X-, Y+, and Y-) and dynamic movements, providing a framework for muscle force analysis. A total of five regression models—Fine Tree (FT), Interaction Linear (IL), Medium Gaussian Support Vector Machine (MG-SVM), Exponential Gaussian Process Regression (Exponential GPR), and Wide Neural Network (WNN)—were evaluated across sixty-three case combinations derived from six features in time domain descriptors: Root Mean Square (RMS), Integrated EMG (IEMG), Waveform Length (WL), Zero Crossing (ZC), Variance (VAR), and Willison’s Amplitude (WAMP). This resulted in the assessment of 630 models for both the X and Y axes. The performance of each model was assessed using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Experimental results demonstrated that the Exponential GPR model achieved the highest accuracy in both axes when utilizing the RMS and IEMG feature combination, yielding an average RMSE of 1.0550 N. The WNN followed as the second-best model, with an RMSE of 1.2631 N using IEMG and VAR in both axes. In addition to predictive accuracy, model selection also considered computational aspects such as training time, model complexity, and inference speed. Among all candidates, the WNN offered the most balanced trade-off between accuracy and efficiency, highlighting its potential for real-time force estimation in human-robot interaction applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","volume":"23 3","pages":"1496 - 1513"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42235-026-00871-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a force estimation system for the X and Y axes based on surface electromyography (sEMG) signals acquired from eight channels of the Myo armband. The ground truth forces were recorded using an ATI 6-axis force sensor in two degrees of freedom (2-DOF) setup. The proposed system aims to estimate both static directional forces (X+, X-, Y+, and Y-) and dynamic movements, providing a framework for muscle force analysis. A total of five regression models—Fine Tree (FT), Interaction Linear (IL), Medium Gaussian Support Vector Machine (MG-SVM), Exponential Gaussian Process Regression (Exponential GPR), and Wide Neural Network (WNN)—were evaluated across sixty-three case combinations derived from six features in time domain descriptors: Root Mean Square (RMS), Integrated EMG (IEMG), Waveform Length (WL), Zero Crossing (ZC), Variance (VAR), and Willison’s Amplitude (WAMP). This resulted in the assessment of 630 models for both the X and Y axes. The performance of each model was assessed using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Experimental results demonstrated that the Exponential GPR model achieved the highest accuracy in both axes when utilizing the RMS and IEMG feature combination, yielding an average RMSE of 1.0550 N. The WNN followed as the second-best model, with an RMSE of 1.2631 N using IEMG and VAR in both axes. In addition to predictive accuracy, model selection also considered computational aspects such as training time, model complexity, and inference speed. Among all candidates, the WNN offered the most balanced trade-off between accuracy and efficiency, highlighting its potential for real-time force estimation in human-robot interaction applications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bionic Engineering (JBE) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers and reviews that apply the knowledge learned from nature and biological systems to solve concrete engineering problems. The topics that JBE covers include but are not limited to:
Mechanisms, kinematical mechanics and control of animal locomotion, development of mobile robots with walking (running and crawling), swimming or flying abilities inspired by animal locomotion.
Structures, morphologies, composition and physical properties of natural and biomaterials; fabrication of new materials mimicking the properties and functions of natural and biomaterials.
Biomedical materials, artificial organs and tissue engineering for medical applications; rehabilitation equipment and devices.
Development of bioinspired computation methods and artificial intelligence for engineering applications.