Screening for high coronary plaque volume in primary prevention: integration of multi-omics and coronary calcium scoring into cardiovascular risk assessment

IF 5.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cheng Hwee Soh , Shaun Khanna , Jingqin Wu , Prasanna Venkataraman , Corey Giles , Nitesh Nerlekar , Melinda Carrington , Gerald F Watts , Stephen J Nicholls , Peter Meikle , Thomas H Marwick
{"title":"Screening for high coronary plaque volume in primary prevention: integration of multi-omics and coronary calcium scoring into cardiovascular risk assessment","authors":"Cheng Hwee Soh ,&nbsp;Shaun Khanna ,&nbsp;Jingqin Wu ,&nbsp;Prasanna Venkataraman ,&nbsp;Corey Giles ,&nbsp;Nitesh Nerlekar ,&nbsp;Melinda Carrington ,&nbsp;Gerald F Watts ,&nbsp;Stephen J Nicholls ,&nbsp;Peter Meikle ,&nbsp;Thomas H Marwick","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.101461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Atherosclerotic plaque volume (PV) predicts future cardiovascular events. As coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is unsuitable for population screening, individuals with high total (T)PV often remain undetected.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the relative and incremental contributions of lipidomic risk score (LRS), polygenic risk score (PRS), and coronary artery calcium score (CAC) improves screening for high TPV.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Primary prevention participants in two trials underwent clinical assessment, CAC, and blood sampling for LRS and PRS. CCTA was obtained in participants with CAC&gt;0 and ≤400. Associations between risk scores and TPV were assessed using linear regression. Logistic regression identified predictors of high TPV; model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination index (IDI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the development cohort (<em>n</em> = 232, mean age 58.5 years), CAC showed the strongest correlation with TPV (R<sup>2</sup>=0.69). Multivariable regression analyses showed that CAC was the only predictor for high TPV (OR 1.03 per 10-point increase [95%CI 1.02–1.03]). In the validation cohort (<em>n</em> = 199, mean age 61.7 years), the AUC was shown to improve from 0.50 with MESA 10-year cardiovascular risk score (without CAC) to 0.91 with the addition of LRS, PRS and CAC (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The continuous NRI was shown to be +1.36 and IDI to be +0.38.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CAC was the dominant determinant of high coronary plaque volume and accounted for the majority of predictive performance. LRS and PRS provided only modest incremental value beyond CAC and clinical risk, supporting their role as complementary rather than primary screening tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101461"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667726000553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Atherosclerotic plaque volume (PV) predicts future cardiovascular events. As coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is unsuitable for population screening, individuals with high total (T)PV often remain undetected.

Objective

To evaluate the relative and incremental contributions of lipidomic risk score (LRS), polygenic risk score (PRS), and coronary artery calcium score (CAC) improves screening for high TPV.

Methods

Primary prevention participants in two trials underwent clinical assessment, CAC, and blood sampling for LRS and PRS. CCTA was obtained in participants with CAC>0 and ≤400. Associations between risk scores and TPV were assessed using linear regression. Logistic regression identified predictors of high TPV; model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination index (IDI).

Results

In the development cohort (n = 232, mean age 58.5 years), CAC showed the strongest correlation with TPV (R2=0.69). Multivariable regression analyses showed that CAC was the only predictor for high TPV (OR 1.03 per 10-point increase [95%CI 1.02–1.03]). In the validation cohort (n = 199, mean age 61.7 years), the AUC was shown to improve from 0.50 with MESA 10-year cardiovascular risk score (without CAC) to 0.91 with the addition of LRS, PRS and CAC (p < 0.001). The continuous NRI was shown to be +1.36 and IDI to be +0.38.

Conclusion

CAC was the dominant determinant of high coronary plaque volume and accounted for the majority of predictive performance. LRS and PRS provided only modest incremental value beyond CAC and clinical risk, supporting their role as complementary rather than primary screening tools.

Abstract Image

初级预防筛查高冠状动脉斑块容量:将多组学和冠状动脉钙评分纳入心血管风险评估
动脉粥样硬化斑块体积(PV)预测未来心血管事件。由于冠状动脉ct血管造影(CCTA)不适合人群筛查,总PV (T)高的个体往往未被发现。目的评价脂质组学风险评分(LRS)、多基因风险评分(PRS)和冠状动脉钙评分(CAC)对高冠脉pv筛查的相对贡献和增量贡献。方法对两项试验的一级预防参与者进行临床评估、CAC和LRS和PRS的血液采样。在CAC>;0和≤400的参与者中获得CCTA。使用线性回归评估风险评分与TPV之间的关系。Logistic回归确定了高TPV的预测因素;采用曲线下面积(AUC)、净重分类指数(NRI)和综合判别指数(IDI)评价模型性能。结果在发展队列中(n = 232,平均年龄58.5岁),CAC与TPV相关性最强(R2=0.69)。多变量回归分析显示,CAC是高TPV的唯一预测因子(OR为1.03 / 10点增加[95%CI 1.02-1.03])。在验证队列(n = 199,平均年龄61.7岁)中,AUC从MESA 10年心血管风险评分(无CAC)的0.50提高到添加LRS、PRS和CAC的0.91 (p < 0.001)。连续NRI为+1.36,IDI为+0.38。结论cac是冠状动脉斑块体积高的主要决定因素,占预测性能的大部分。除了CAC和临床风险之外,LRS和PRS仅提供了适度的增量价值,支持它们作为补充而不是主要筛查工具的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书