Rosalynn Gill , Meredith A. Carpenter , Amy Holstein , Ariadne Reyes Garcia , Ayman Alkholder , Aanchal Gupta , Vatsala Singh , Arshed A. Quyyumi , Neda Rasouli , Ian J. Neeland , Stephen A. Williams
{"title":"Cardioprotective therapy in type 2 diabetes guided by a proteomic risk model: A randomized trial","authors":"Rosalynn Gill , Meredith A. Carpenter , Amy Holstein , Ariadne Reyes Garcia , Ayman Alkholder , Aanchal Gupta , Vatsala Singh , Arshed A. Quyyumi , Neda Rasouli , Ian J. Neeland , Stephen A. Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.101426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardioprotective (CP) therapies such as GLP-1 RA, SGLT2i, and PCSK9i medications remain underutilized in cardiovascular (CV) risk management. Individualized risk assessment using blood-based proteomic testing, such as Residual Cardiovascular Risk (RCVR) scores, may help guide treatment decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate whether access to RCVR scores improves risk-concordant prescribing of CP medications in clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this multicenter, open label, behavioral randomized trial, adults with type 2 diabetes eligible for CP medications underwent SomaScan™ proteomic testing. Participants were randomized to an informed (RCVR results shared with patient and clinicians) or uninformed arm (results withheld until study end). CP prescribing rate and sensitivity-to-change of RCVR to CP initiation were assessed by trial arm. Chi-square trend in proportions, one-sided 2-sample tests for equality of proportions, and one-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 377 baseline participants analyzed (59 % informed; mean age 66 ± 10.3 years; 45 % female), CP prescribing was significantly higher in the informed versus uninformed arm (32.1 % vs 9.6 %; OR 5.45; 95 % CI: 2.31–12.89; <em>p</em> < 0.001); per-risk-bin rates were also significantly higher in all elevated risk bins (<em>p</em><0.05). Among 173 participants with paired RCVR scores from baseline-6-months, CP initiation (<em>n</em> = 24) in the informed arm (<em>n</em> = 92) corresponded to a 3.9 % reduction in proteomic-predicted CV risk (<em>p</em> = 0.036).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Disclosure of proteomic RCVR scores was associated with higher rates of CP prescribing and short-term reductions in proteomic risk scores among CP medication users; proteomics-based risk assessment may support personalized CV prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101426"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667726000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cardioprotective (CP) therapies such as GLP-1 RA, SGLT2i, and PCSK9i medications remain underutilized in cardiovascular (CV) risk management. Individualized risk assessment using blood-based proteomic testing, such as Residual Cardiovascular Risk (RCVR) scores, may help guide treatment decisions.
Objective
To evaluate whether access to RCVR scores improves risk-concordant prescribing of CP medications in clinical practice.
Methods
In this multicenter, open label, behavioral randomized trial, adults with type 2 diabetes eligible for CP medications underwent SomaScan™ proteomic testing. Participants were randomized to an informed (RCVR results shared with patient and clinicians) or uninformed arm (results withheld until study end). CP prescribing rate and sensitivity-to-change of RCVR to CP initiation were assessed by trial arm. Chi-square trend in proportions, one-sided 2-sample tests for equality of proportions, and one-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical analysis.
Results
Among 377 baseline participants analyzed (59 % informed; mean age 66 ± 10.3 years; 45 % female), CP prescribing was significantly higher in the informed versus uninformed arm (32.1 % vs 9.6 %; OR 5.45; 95 % CI: 2.31–12.89; p < 0.001); per-risk-bin rates were also significantly higher in all elevated risk bins (p<0.05). Among 173 participants with paired RCVR scores from baseline-6-months, CP initiation (n = 24) in the informed arm (n = 92) corresponded to a 3.9 % reduction in proteomic-predicted CV risk (p = 0.036).
Conclusions
Disclosure of proteomic RCVR scores was associated with higher rates of CP prescribing and short-term reductions in proteomic risk scores among CP medication users; proteomics-based risk assessment may support personalized CV prevention.