Cardioprotective therapy in type 2 diabetes guided by a proteomic risk model: A randomized trial

IF 5.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rosalynn Gill , Meredith A. Carpenter , Amy Holstein , Ariadne Reyes Garcia , Ayman Alkholder , Aanchal Gupta , Vatsala Singh , Arshed A. Quyyumi , Neda Rasouli , Ian J. Neeland , Stephen A. Williams
{"title":"Cardioprotective therapy in type 2 diabetes guided by a proteomic risk model: A randomized trial","authors":"Rosalynn Gill ,&nbsp;Meredith A. Carpenter ,&nbsp;Amy Holstein ,&nbsp;Ariadne Reyes Garcia ,&nbsp;Ayman Alkholder ,&nbsp;Aanchal Gupta ,&nbsp;Vatsala Singh ,&nbsp;Arshed A. Quyyumi ,&nbsp;Neda Rasouli ,&nbsp;Ian J. Neeland ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.101426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardioprotective (CP) therapies such as GLP-1 RA, SGLT2i, and PCSK9i medications remain underutilized in cardiovascular (CV) risk management. Individualized risk assessment using blood-based proteomic testing, such as Residual Cardiovascular Risk (RCVR) scores, may help guide treatment decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate whether access to RCVR scores improves risk-concordant prescribing of CP medications in clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this multicenter, open label, behavioral randomized trial, adults with type 2 diabetes eligible for CP medications underwent SomaScan™ proteomic testing. Participants were randomized to an informed (RCVR results shared with patient and clinicians) or uninformed arm (results withheld until study end). CP prescribing rate and sensitivity-to-change of RCVR to CP initiation were assessed by trial arm. Chi-square trend in proportions, one-sided 2-sample tests for equality of proportions, and one-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 377 baseline participants analyzed (59 % informed; mean age 66 ± 10.3 years; 45 % female), CP prescribing was significantly higher in the informed versus uninformed arm (32.1 % vs 9.6 %; OR 5.45; 95 % CI: 2.31–12.89; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001); per-risk-bin rates were also significantly higher in all elevated risk bins (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05). Among 173 participants with paired RCVR scores from baseline-6-months, CP initiation (<em>n</em> = 24) in the informed arm (<em>n</em> = 92) corresponded to a 3.9 % reduction in proteomic-predicted CV risk (<em>p</em> = 0.036).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Disclosure of proteomic RCVR scores was associated with higher rates of CP prescribing and short-term reductions in proteomic risk scores among CP medication users; proteomics-based risk assessment may support personalized CV prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101426"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667726000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardioprotective (CP) therapies such as GLP-1 RA, SGLT2i, and PCSK9i medications remain underutilized in cardiovascular (CV) risk management. Individualized risk assessment using blood-based proteomic testing, such as Residual Cardiovascular Risk (RCVR) scores, may help guide treatment decisions.

Objective

To evaluate whether access to RCVR scores improves risk-concordant prescribing of CP medications in clinical practice.

Methods

In this multicenter, open label, behavioral randomized trial, adults with type 2 diabetes eligible for CP medications underwent SomaScan™ proteomic testing. Participants were randomized to an informed (RCVR results shared with patient and clinicians) or uninformed arm (results withheld until study end). CP prescribing rate and sensitivity-to-change of RCVR to CP initiation were assessed by trial arm. Chi-square trend in proportions, one-sided 2-sample tests for equality of proportions, and one-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Among 377 baseline participants analyzed (59 % informed; mean age 66 ± 10.3 years; 45 % female), CP prescribing was significantly higher in the informed versus uninformed arm (32.1 % vs 9.6 %; OR 5.45; 95 % CI: 2.31–12.89; p < 0.001); per-risk-bin rates were also significantly higher in all elevated risk bins (p<0.05). Among 173 participants with paired RCVR scores from baseline-6-months, CP initiation (n = 24) in the informed arm (n = 92) corresponded to a 3.9 % reduction in proteomic-predicted CV risk (p = 0.036).

Conclusions

Disclosure of proteomic RCVR scores was associated with higher rates of CP prescribing and short-term reductions in proteomic risk scores among CP medication users; proteomics-based risk assessment may support personalized CV prevention.
由蛋白质组学风险模型指导的2型糖尿病心脏保护治疗:一项随机试验
背景:心脏保护(CP)疗法,如GLP-1 RA、SGLT2i和PCSK9i药物在心血管(CV)风险管理中仍未得到充分利用。使用基于血液的蛋白质组学测试进行个体化风险评估,如剩余心血管风险(RCVR)评分,可能有助于指导治疗决策。目的评价获得RCVR评分是否能提高临床CP药物处方的风险一致性。方法在这项多中心、开放标签、行为随机试验中,符合CP药物治疗条件的成人2型糖尿病患者接受了SomaScan™蛋白质组学检测。参与者被随机分为知情组(RCVR结果与患者和临床医生共享)或不知情组(结果直到研究结束才公布)。通过试验组评估CP处方率和RCVR对CP起始的敏感性。采用比例卡方趋势、单侧两样本比例相等检验和单侧配对Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析。结果在分析的377名基线参与者中(59%知情,平均年龄66±10.3岁,45%为女性),知情组的CP处方明显高于未知情组(32.1% vs 9.6%; OR 5.45; 95% CI: 2.31-12.89; p < 0.001);在所有高风险区,每个风险区发生率也显著升高(p < 0.05)。在基线-6个月配对RCVR评分的173名参与者中,知情组(n = 92)的CP起始(n = 24)对应于蛋白质组学预测的CV风险降低3.9% (p = 0.036)。结论蛋白质组学RCVR评分的披露与CP药物使用者中较高的CP处方率和蛋白质组学风险评分的短期降低有关;基于蛋白质组学的风险评估可能支持个体化心血管预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书