Central sensitization, work-related stress, and musculoskeletal pain symptoms in desk-based workers with and without migraine: a cross-sectional study.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dilara Onan, Pelin Yenilmez Yeşildaş, Merve Ceren Akgör, Doğan Porsnok
{"title":"Central sensitization, work-related stress, and musculoskeletal pain symptoms in desk-based workers with and without migraine: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Dilara Onan, Pelin Yenilmez Yeşildaş, Merve Ceren Akgör, Doğan Porsnok","doi":"10.1186/s10194-026-02411-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine can impair productivity, work performance, and daily functioning in working-age adults. While higher Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) scores have been observed in migraine chronicity, work-related stress, and musculoskeletal pain are also common among desk-based workers and may play a role in exacerbating migraine symptoms. However, these factors have rarely been studied together in this population. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare central sensitization, work-related stress, and musculoskeletal pain symptoms in desk-based workers with and without migraine, to examine the relationships among them, and to identify the determinants of central sensitization in individuals with migraine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 228 desk-based workers: a control group (CG) without migraine (n = 84), episodic migraine (EM) (n = 74), and chronic migraine (CM) (n = 70). Participants completed the CSI, General Work Stress Scale (GWSS), Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). Group comparisons were performed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Spearman coefficients were used in correlation analyses. Multiple linear regression was applied to identify factors associated with CSI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both migraine groups scored higher on the CSI compared to the CG (p < 0.001), with CM showing the highest CSI scores. This difference remained significant after adjusting for confounders. GWSS scores were also higher in both migraine groups than the CG (p < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment. NMQ;3-items were significantly higher in the migraine groups compared to the CG (p ≤ 0.005), independent of confounders. In the migraine groups, higher CSI scores showed a positive correlation with GWSS, MIDAS, HIT-6, and NMQ. In multiple linear regression analysis, GWSS (β = 0.380), number of painful body regions during the past 12 months (β = 0.382), MIDAS (β = 0.230), and the number of headache days per month (β = 0.170) were identified as variables independently associated with CSI scores (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Desk-based workers with migraine had higher central sensitization, greater work-related stress, and more widespread musculoskeletal pain symptoms compared to those without migraine. In desk-based workers with migraine, central sensitization was more pronounced in CM than EM, suggesting a potential role in migraine chronicity. These findings support multifaceted management strategies for desk-based workers with migraine, including headache-stress management, musculoskeletal rehabilitation, and Sustainable Development Goal-3, \"to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all ages.\"</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT07554664 (registration date: 21.04.2026).</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13422304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-026-02411-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Migraine can impair productivity, work performance, and daily functioning in working-age adults. While higher Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) scores have been observed in migraine chronicity, work-related stress, and musculoskeletal pain are also common among desk-based workers and may play a role in exacerbating migraine symptoms. However, these factors have rarely been studied together in this population. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare central sensitization, work-related stress, and musculoskeletal pain symptoms in desk-based workers with and without migraine, to examine the relationships among them, and to identify the determinants of central sensitization in individuals with migraine.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 228 desk-based workers: a control group (CG) without migraine (n = 84), episodic migraine (EM) (n = 74), and chronic migraine (CM) (n = 70). Participants completed the CSI, General Work Stress Scale (GWSS), Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). Group comparisons were performed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Spearman coefficients were used in correlation analyses. Multiple linear regression was applied to identify factors associated with CSI.

Results: Both migraine groups scored higher on the CSI compared to the CG (p < 0.001), with CM showing the highest CSI scores. This difference remained significant after adjusting for confounders. GWSS scores were also higher in both migraine groups than the CG (p < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment. NMQ;3-items were significantly higher in the migraine groups compared to the CG (p ≤ 0.005), independent of confounders. In the migraine groups, higher CSI scores showed a positive correlation with GWSS, MIDAS, HIT-6, and NMQ. In multiple linear regression analysis, GWSS (β = 0.380), number of painful body regions during the past 12 months (β = 0.382), MIDAS (β = 0.230), and the number of headache days per month (β = 0.170) were identified as variables independently associated with CSI scores (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Desk-based workers with migraine had higher central sensitization, greater work-related stress, and more widespread musculoskeletal pain symptoms compared to those without migraine. In desk-based workers with migraine, central sensitization was more pronounced in CM than EM, suggesting a potential role in migraine chronicity. These findings support multifaceted management strategies for desk-based workers with migraine, including headache-stress management, musculoskeletal rehabilitation, and Sustainable Development Goal-3, "to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all ages."

Trial registration: NCT07554664 (registration date: 21.04.2026).

中枢敏化、工作压力和肌肉骨骼疼痛症状在有和没有偏头痛的办公桌工作人员:一项横断面研究。
背景:偏头痛会损害工作年龄成年人的生产力、工作表现和日常功能。虽然在偏头痛慢性患者中观察到较高的中枢致敏性量表(CSI)得分,但与工作有关的压力和肌肉骨骼疼痛在办公桌工作人员中也很常见,并且可能在加剧偏头痛症状中起作用。然而,这些因素很少在这一人群中一起研究。本横断面研究旨在比较有偏头痛和无偏头痛的办公桌工作人员的中枢致敏、工作压力和肌肉骨骼疼痛症状,以检查它们之间的关系,并确定偏头痛患者中枢致敏的决定因素。方法:这项横断面研究包括228名办公桌工作人员:没有偏头痛(n = 84),发作性偏头痛(n = 74)和慢性偏头痛(n = 70)的对照组(CG)。参与者完成了CSI、一般工作压力量表(GWSS)、北欧肌肉骨骼问卷(NMQ)、偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)和头痛影响测试-6 (HIT-6)。采用方差分析或Kruskal-Wallis检验进行组间比较。相关分析采用Spearman系数。采用多元线性回归分析CSI的相关因素。结果:与CG组相比,两组偏头痛患者的CSI得分都更高(p)。结论:与没有偏头痛的人相比,偏头痛的办公桌工作人员有更高的中枢敏化,更大的工作压力和更广泛的肌肉骨骼疼痛症状。在患有偏头痛的办公桌工作人员中,中枢致敏在CM中比EM中更为明显,这表明在偏头痛慢性性中起潜在作用。这些发现支持了针对偏头痛办公桌工作人员的多方面管理策略,包括头痛压力管理、肌肉骨骼康复和可持续发展目标3,“确保健康生活,促进所有年龄段的福祉”。试验注册:NCT07554664(注册日期:21.04.2026)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书