Caregiving Models and Cognitive Decline in Middle-Aged and Older Adults with Limitations in Activities of Daily Living: A CHARLS Cohort Study (2011-2020).

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ying Zhong, Rumeng Liu
{"title":"Caregiving Models and Cognitive Decline in Middle-Aged and Older Adults with Limitations in Activities of Daily Living: A CHARLS Cohort Study (2011-2020).","authors":"Ying Zhong, Rumeng Liu","doi":"10.1159/000552833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limitations in activities of daily living represent a crucial risk factor for cognitive decline, while the role of caregiving models in this process remains unclearly elucidated. To examine the correlation between different caregiving models and cognitive decline of people aged 45 and above with basic activity of daily living (BADL)/instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were derived from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study database covering the period 2011-2020. Using multiple linear regression models and linear mixed effect models (LMM), the association between different nursing models and cognitive function trajectories was systematically evaluated, and subgroup analyses were conducted to test the robustness and heterogeneity of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple regression analysis indicated that spousal care was negatively associated with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMES) scores (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.12-1.24, p = 0.017), whereas care provided by children, other relatives, and hired caregivers notably improved MMSE scores (p < 0.05), with hired care yielding the greatest improvement (OR = 4.61, 95% CI: 2.08-7.14, p < 0.001). The LMM further revealed that, compared to no care, all other care types were substantially related to the rate of change in MMSE scores over time. Subgroup analysis demonstrated pronounced interactions in sex and chronic disease subgroups (P for interaction <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work provides empirical evidence for optimizing long-term care services, highlighting the importance of integrating professional care support to delay cognitive decline among individuals aged 45 and older with BADL/IADL limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000552833","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Limitations in activities of daily living represent a crucial risk factor for cognitive decline, while the role of caregiving models in this process remains unclearly elucidated. To examine the correlation between different caregiving models and cognitive decline of people aged 45 and above with basic activity of daily living (BADL)/instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) limitations.

Methods: Data were derived from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study database covering the period 2011-2020. Using multiple linear regression models and linear mixed effect models (LMM), the association between different nursing models and cognitive function trajectories was systematically evaluated, and subgroup analyses were conducted to test the robustness and heterogeneity of the results.

Results: Multiple regression analysis indicated that spousal care was negatively associated with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMES) scores (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.12-1.24, p = 0.017), whereas care provided by children, other relatives, and hired caregivers notably improved MMSE scores (p < 0.05), with hired care yielding the greatest improvement (OR = 4.61, 95% CI: 2.08-7.14, p < 0.001). The LMM further revealed that, compared to no care, all other care types were substantially related to the rate of change in MMSE scores over time. Subgroup analysis demonstrated pronounced interactions in sex and chronic disease subgroups (P for interaction <0.05).

Conclusion: This work provides empirical evidence for optimizing long-term care services, highlighting the importance of integrating professional care support to delay cognitive decline among individuals aged 45 and older with BADL/IADL limitations.

护理模式与日常生活活动受限中老年人认知能力下降:CHARLS队列研究(2011-2020)。
背景:日常生活活动的限制是认知能力下降的一个重要风险因素,而护理模式在这一过程中的作用尚不清楚。目的:探讨不同护理模式与45岁及以上老年人基本日常生活活动能力(BADL)/辅助日常生活活动能力(IADL)限制的认知能力下降的相关性。方法:数据来源于中国健康与退休纵向研究数据库,涵盖2011-2020年。采用多元线性回归模型和线性混合效应模型(LMM),系统评价不同护理模式与认知功能轨迹的相关性,并进行亚组分析,检验结果的稳健性和异质性。结果:多元回归分析显示,配偶照顾与轻度精神状态检查(MMES)得分呈负相关(OR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.12-1.24, P=0.017),而子女、其他亲属和雇佣照顾者的照顾显著提高了MMSE得分(P < 0.05)。本研究为优化长期护理服务提供了经验证据,强调了整合专业护理支持对延缓45岁及以上BADL/IADL限制个体认知能力下降的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书