Zhiyong Qi , Haitao Yang , Zekun Yang , Zitong Bai , Ang Chen , Yixuan Zhang , Yu Ren , Junmin Zhang , Tianyu Xiang , Shiyu Yan , Guangcai Xu , Qinghua Guo
{"title":"Layer-explicit forest understory measurement: Assessing the capability of UAV LiDAR to extract understory vegetation structure","authors":"Zhiyong Qi , Haitao Yang , Zekun Yang , Zitong Bai , Ang Chen , Yixuan Zhang , Yu Ren , Junmin Zhang , Tianyu Xiang , Shiyu Yan , Guangcai Xu , Qinghua Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest understory vegetation is an important component of forests and plays an irreplaceable role in ecological applications such as forest regeneration, succession, fire behavior, and understory economy. Unlike the overstory, which has well-established observational frameworks and structural metrics, the understory lacks explicit delineation and corresponding quantitative descriptors. This gap hampers its structural characterization and integration into forest inventories. Although airborne LiDAR has been used to retrieve understory structure, most efforts rely on spatiotemporally consistent field plots, and the underlying error sources remain unclear, limiting robustness of understory retrieval methods. To address these gaps, we propose an LiDAR-based measurement framework that explicitly defines understory vegetation as a spatially continuous layer. Using ground-based laser scanning (GLS, including terrestrial (TLS) and mobile laser scanning (MLS)) as reference, the capability of unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanning (ULS) to quantify understory structure was systematically assessed in seven sites across China. By combining semantic and individual tree segmentation, we extracted understory layer and quantified understory structure using a complementary set of four metrics including height, cover, density, and complexity. We further analyzed the factors influencing ULS estimation errors based on pulse-thinning experiments. The results showed that ULS-derived structural metrics exhibited strong agreement with GLS (R² = 0.73 ∼ 0.88). Cross-sectional ULS point cloud profiles exhibited clear separation between understory and overstory layers, with no gaps or striping artifacts. Sensitivity experiments demonstrated that penetration capability, quantified by the maximum number of returns per pulse, was the dominant source of uncertainty, determining whether the understory layer could be effectively detected, while point density governed structural detail once detected. Environmental factor analysis indicated that increasing canopy cover amplified errors, whereas greater canopy complexity enhanced penetration and reduced errors. We recommend ULS systems capable of recording ≥ 3 returns with point densities ≥ 500 pts/m² to balance accuracy and efficiency. This study provides a new perspective for the quantitative assessment of understory structure and offers methodological and practical insights for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"387 ","pages":"Article 111257"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016819232600242X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forest understory vegetation is an important component of forests and plays an irreplaceable role in ecological applications such as forest regeneration, succession, fire behavior, and understory economy. Unlike the overstory, which has well-established observational frameworks and structural metrics, the understory lacks explicit delineation and corresponding quantitative descriptors. This gap hampers its structural characterization and integration into forest inventories. Although airborne LiDAR has been used to retrieve understory structure, most efforts rely on spatiotemporally consistent field plots, and the underlying error sources remain unclear, limiting robustness of understory retrieval methods. To address these gaps, we propose an LiDAR-based measurement framework that explicitly defines understory vegetation as a spatially continuous layer. Using ground-based laser scanning (GLS, including terrestrial (TLS) and mobile laser scanning (MLS)) as reference, the capability of unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanning (ULS) to quantify understory structure was systematically assessed in seven sites across China. By combining semantic and individual tree segmentation, we extracted understory layer and quantified understory structure using a complementary set of four metrics including height, cover, density, and complexity. We further analyzed the factors influencing ULS estimation errors based on pulse-thinning experiments. The results showed that ULS-derived structural metrics exhibited strong agreement with GLS (R² = 0.73 ∼ 0.88). Cross-sectional ULS point cloud profiles exhibited clear separation between understory and overstory layers, with no gaps or striping artifacts. Sensitivity experiments demonstrated that penetration capability, quantified by the maximum number of returns per pulse, was the dominant source of uncertainty, determining whether the understory layer could be effectively detected, while point density governed structural detail once detected. Environmental factor analysis indicated that increasing canopy cover amplified errors, whereas greater canopy complexity enhanced penetration and reduced errors. We recommend ULS systems capable of recording ≥ 3 returns with point densities ≥ 500 pts/m² to balance accuracy and efficiency. This study provides a new perspective for the quantitative assessment of understory structure and offers methodological and practical insights for future research.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.