Layer-explicit forest understory measurement: Assessing the capability of UAV LiDAR to extract understory vegetation structure

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2026-08-15 Epub Date: 2026-06-02 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111257
Zhiyong Qi , Haitao Yang , Zekun Yang , Zitong Bai , Ang Chen , Yixuan Zhang , Yu Ren , Junmin Zhang , Tianyu Xiang , Shiyu Yan , Guangcai Xu , Qinghua Guo
{"title":"Layer-explicit forest understory measurement: Assessing the capability of UAV LiDAR to extract understory vegetation structure","authors":"Zhiyong Qi ,&nbsp;Haitao Yang ,&nbsp;Zekun Yang ,&nbsp;Zitong Bai ,&nbsp;Ang Chen ,&nbsp;Yixuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Yu Ren ,&nbsp;Junmin Zhang ,&nbsp;Tianyu Xiang ,&nbsp;Shiyu Yan ,&nbsp;Guangcai Xu ,&nbsp;Qinghua Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest understory vegetation is an important component of forests and plays an irreplaceable role in ecological applications such as forest regeneration, succession, fire behavior, and understory economy. Unlike the overstory, which has well-established observational frameworks and structural metrics, the understory lacks explicit delineation and corresponding quantitative descriptors. This gap hampers its structural characterization and integration into forest inventories. Although airborne LiDAR has been used to retrieve understory structure, most efforts rely on spatiotemporally consistent field plots, and the underlying error sources remain unclear, limiting robustness of understory retrieval methods. To address these gaps, we propose an LiDAR-based measurement framework that explicitly defines understory vegetation as a spatially continuous layer. Using ground-based laser scanning (GLS, including terrestrial (TLS) and mobile laser scanning (MLS)) as reference, the capability of unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanning (ULS) to quantify understory structure was systematically assessed in seven sites across China. By combining semantic and individual tree segmentation, we extracted understory layer and quantified understory structure using a complementary set of four metrics including height, cover, density, and complexity. We further analyzed the factors influencing ULS estimation errors based on pulse-thinning experiments. The results showed that ULS-derived structural metrics exhibited strong agreement with GLS (R² = 0.73 ∼ 0.88). Cross-sectional ULS point cloud profiles exhibited clear separation between understory and overstory layers, with no gaps or striping artifacts. Sensitivity experiments demonstrated that penetration capability, quantified by the maximum number of returns per pulse, was the dominant source of uncertainty, determining whether the understory layer could be effectively detected, while point density governed structural detail once detected. Environmental factor analysis indicated that increasing canopy cover amplified errors, whereas greater canopy complexity enhanced penetration and reduced errors. We recommend ULS systems capable of recording ≥ 3 returns with point densities ≥ 500 pts/m² to balance accuracy and efficiency. This study provides a new perspective for the quantitative assessment of understory structure and offers methodological and practical insights for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"387 ","pages":"Article 111257"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016819232600242X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest understory vegetation is an important component of forests and plays an irreplaceable role in ecological applications such as forest regeneration, succession, fire behavior, and understory economy. Unlike the overstory, which has well-established observational frameworks and structural metrics, the understory lacks explicit delineation and corresponding quantitative descriptors. This gap hampers its structural characterization and integration into forest inventories. Although airborne LiDAR has been used to retrieve understory structure, most efforts rely on spatiotemporally consistent field plots, and the underlying error sources remain unclear, limiting robustness of understory retrieval methods. To address these gaps, we propose an LiDAR-based measurement framework that explicitly defines understory vegetation as a spatially continuous layer. Using ground-based laser scanning (GLS, including terrestrial (TLS) and mobile laser scanning (MLS)) as reference, the capability of unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanning (ULS) to quantify understory structure was systematically assessed in seven sites across China. By combining semantic and individual tree segmentation, we extracted understory layer and quantified understory structure using a complementary set of four metrics including height, cover, density, and complexity. We further analyzed the factors influencing ULS estimation errors based on pulse-thinning experiments. The results showed that ULS-derived structural metrics exhibited strong agreement with GLS (R² = 0.73 ∼ 0.88). Cross-sectional ULS point cloud profiles exhibited clear separation between understory and overstory layers, with no gaps or striping artifacts. Sensitivity experiments demonstrated that penetration capability, quantified by the maximum number of returns per pulse, was the dominant source of uncertainty, determining whether the understory layer could be effectively detected, while point density governed structural detail once detected. Environmental factor analysis indicated that increasing canopy cover amplified errors, whereas greater canopy complexity enhanced penetration and reduced errors. We recommend ULS systems capable of recording ≥ 3 returns with point densities ≥ 500 pts/m² to balance accuracy and efficiency. This study provides a new perspective for the quantitative assessment of understory structure and offers methodological and practical insights for future research.
显层森林林下植被测量:无人机激光雷达提取林下植被结构的能力评估
林下植被是森林的重要组成部分,在森林更新、演替、火行为、林下经济等生态应用中具有不可替代的作用。与具有完善的观测框架和结构指标的林下植被不同,林下植被缺乏明确的描述和相应的定量描述。这一差距妨碍了其结构特征和纳入森林清单。尽管机载激光雷达已被用于林下结构检索,但大多数工作依赖于时空一致的野外图,并且潜在的误差来源仍然不清楚,限制了林下结构检索方法的鲁棒性。为了解决这些差距,我们提出了一个基于激光雷达的测量框架,该框架明确地将林下植被定义为空间连续层。以地面激光扫描(GLS)(包括地面激光扫描(TLS)和移动激光扫描(MLS))为参考,系统评估了无人机激光扫描(ULS)在中国7个站点量化林下植被结构的能力。结合语义和单树分割,利用高度、覆盖度、密度和复杂性等4个互补指标提取林下层,量化林下层结构。在脉冲细化实验的基础上,进一步分析了影响ULS估计误差的因素。结果表明,uls衍生的结构指标与GLS具有很强的一致性(R²= 0.73 ~ 0.88)。横截面ULS点云剖面显示林下层和林下层之间有明显的分离,没有间隙或条状伪影。灵敏度实验表明,以每脉冲最大返回次数量化的穿透能力是不确定性的主要来源,它决定了是否可以有效地探测到下层植被,而点密度则决定了一旦探测到结构细节。环境因子分析表明,冠层覆盖度的增加会放大误差,而冠层复杂性的增加会增强穿透度,减小误差。我们建议ULS系统能够记录≥3次返回,点密度≥500 pts/m²,以平衡准确性和效率。该研究为林下结构的定量评价提供了新的视角,并为今后的研究提供了方法和实践上的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书