Bridging plans and energy paths: A multi-nodal prospective analysis of the Spanish electricity generation and transmission system

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Strategy Reviews Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-28 DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2026.102256
Alicia Mortera-Canga , Pedro Gerber Machado , Juan Diego Rios-Peñaloza , Diego Iribarren , Milan Prodanovic
{"title":"Bridging plans and energy paths: A multi-nodal prospective analysis of the Spanish electricity generation and transmission system","authors":"Alicia Mortera-Canga ,&nbsp;Pedro Gerber Machado ,&nbsp;Juan Diego Rios-Peñaloza ,&nbsp;Diego Iribarren ,&nbsp;Milan Prodanovic","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2026.102256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>National energy system decarbonisation plans increasingly rely on optimisation models to identify cost-effective power system pathways. These models typically do not incorporate renewable energy projects currently under development, as defined by European regulatory processes. This paper assesses how different planning approaches can be integrated within a spatially explicit electricity-sector capacity expansion model based on PyPSA-Eur, using a myopic model from 2025 to 2050. The analysis compares a cost-optimal baseline, National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP) targets, and a deployment-driven scenario based on projects under development, enabling a more realistic assessment that bridges the gap between plans and energy pathways.</div><div>The Spanish power system model is implemented by replacing default PyPSA-Eur datasets with a national georeferenced power plant database derived from official administrative registers and complementary sources, and by representing transmission constraints under conservative line ratings.</div><div>The results indicate that the NECP trajectory can be integrated within the model and extended over a long-term horizon, leading to a system characterised by high photovoltaic penetration. Differences across scenarios are reflected in battery capacity, being 32 GW for the Optimised scenario, 22 GW for the NECP scenario and 27 GW for the Authorised scenario, curtailment levels, reaching 32 TWh in the NECP scenario and 25 TWh in the other two alternative scenarios in 2050, and nodal self-sufficiency, with the lowest value being 18% in the Optimised scenario in 2037 and the highest value 68% in the NECP scenario in 2033. The Authorised scenario performs comparably in terms of system costs for the year 2050, while improving spatial balance and reducing curtailment relative to the cost-optimal pathway.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102256"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X26002221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

National energy system decarbonisation plans increasingly rely on optimisation models to identify cost-effective power system pathways. These models typically do not incorporate renewable energy projects currently under development, as defined by European regulatory processes. This paper assesses how different planning approaches can be integrated within a spatially explicit electricity-sector capacity expansion model based on PyPSA-Eur, using a myopic model from 2025 to 2050. The analysis compares a cost-optimal baseline, National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP) targets, and a deployment-driven scenario based on projects under development, enabling a more realistic assessment that bridges the gap between plans and energy pathways.
The Spanish power system model is implemented by replacing default PyPSA-Eur datasets with a national georeferenced power plant database derived from official administrative registers and complementary sources, and by representing transmission constraints under conservative line ratings.
The results indicate that the NECP trajectory can be integrated within the model and extended over a long-term horizon, leading to a system characterised by high photovoltaic penetration. Differences across scenarios are reflected in battery capacity, being 32 GW for the Optimised scenario, 22 GW for the NECP scenario and 27 GW for the Authorised scenario, curtailment levels, reaching 32 TWh in the NECP scenario and 25 TWh in the other two alternative scenarios in 2050, and nodal self-sufficiency, with the lowest value being 18% in the Optimised scenario in 2037 and the highest value 68% in the NECP scenario in 2033. The Authorised scenario performs comparably in terms of system costs for the year 2050, while improving spatial balance and reducing curtailment relative to the cost-optimal pathway.

Abstract Image

桥接计划和能源路径:西班牙发电和输电系统的多节点前瞻性分析
国家能源系统脱碳计划越来越依赖于优化模型来确定具有成本效益的电力系统路径。按照欧洲监管程序的定义,这些模式通常不包括目前正在开发的可再生能源项目。本文利用2025年至2050年的短视模型,评估了如何将不同的规划方法整合到基于PyPSA-Eur的空间明确的电力部门产能扩张模型中。该分析比较了成本最优基线、国家能源和气候计划(NECP)目标和基于正在开发项目的部署驱动情景,从而实现了更现实的评估,弥合了计划和能源途径之间的差距。西班牙电力系统模型的实施方式是用国家地理参考电厂数据库取代默认的PyPSA-Eur数据集,该数据库来源于官方行政登记和补充来源,并在保守的线路额定下表示传输约束。结果表明,NECP轨迹可以整合到模型中,并在长期范围内扩展,从而形成一个具有高光伏渗透率的系统。不同情景的差异反映在电池容量上,优化情景为32吉瓦,NECP情景为22吉瓦,授权情景为27吉瓦;弃电水平,2050年NECP情景达到32太瓦时,其他两个备选情景达到25太瓦时;节点自给自足,优化情景2037年最低值为18%,NECP情景2033年最高值为68%。授权方案在2050年的系统成本方面表现相当,同时相对于成本最优途径改善了空间平衡并减少了弃风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书