The impact of liveability on active (leisure) travel

IF 6.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2026.104716
Aslan Zorlu , Mirjam Schindler
{"title":"The impact of liveability on active (leisure) travel","authors":"Aslan Zorlu ,&nbsp;Mirjam Schindler","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2026.104716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Active mobility offers important health and environmental benefits, making the promotion of walking and cycling a key objective for urban and transport planners. While studies suggest a positive association between more liveable areas and higher active travel rates, establishing a causal relationship remains challenging due to potential endogeneity. This study addresses this issue by quantifying the impact of liveability on active leisure travel, using data from the Dutch National Travel Survey and a comprehensive measure of neighbourhood liveability. Recognising that active mobility is a viable substitute for motorised travel for shorter distances and less time-sensitive journeys, this study examines leisure-time travel mode choices for distances up to 20 km. We estimate a multilevel mixed effect probit model with endogenous liveability, accounting for the spatial interdependence of neighbourhood liveability. Our results – accounting for endogeneity and spatial autocorrelation - show that higher neighbourhood liveability significantly increases the likelihood of choosing active travel modes (by 10 percentage points between the least and most liveable neighbourhoods). We show that even modest improvements in neighbourhood liveability could meaningfully shift travel behaviour. These results emphasise the importance of creating more liveable environments to stimulate active (leisure) travel and indirectly promote healthy and sustainable lifestyles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 104716"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692326001705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Active mobility offers important health and environmental benefits, making the promotion of walking and cycling a key objective for urban and transport planners. While studies suggest a positive association between more liveable areas and higher active travel rates, establishing a causal relationship remains challenging due to potential endogeneity. This study addresses this issue by quantifying the impact of liveability on active leisure travel, using data from the Dutch National Travel Survey and a comprehensive measure of neighbourhood liveability. Recognising that active mobility is a viable substitute for motorised travel for shorter distances and less time-sensitive journeys, this study examines leisure-time travel mode choices for distances up to 20 km. We estimate a multilevel mixed effect probit model with endogenous liveability, accounting for the spatial interdependence of neighbourhood liveability. Our results – accounting for endogeneity and spatial autocorrelation - show that higher neighbourhood liveability significantly increases the likelihood of choosing active travel modes (by 10 percentage points between the least and most liveable neighbourhoods). We show that even modest improvements in neighbourhood liveability could meaningfully shift travel behaviour. These results emphasise the importance of creating more liveable environments to stimulate active (leisure) travel and indirectly promote healthy and sustainable lifestyles.
宜居性对主动(休闲)旅行的影响
积极的流动性提供了重要的健康和环境效益,使促进步行和骑自行车成为城市和交通规划者的一个关键目标。虽然研究表明,更适宜居住的地区和更高的主动旅行率之间存在正相关关系,但由于潜在的内生性,建立因果关系仍然具有挑战性。本研究通过量化宜居性对积极休闲旅游的影响来解决这个问题,使用了荷兰国家旅游调查的数据和社区宜居性的综合衡量标准。我们认识到,对于短距离和对时间不太敏感的旅行,主动出行是机动出行的可行替代品,本研究调查了20公里以内的休闲时间出行模式选择。我们估计了一个具有内生宜居性的多层次混合效应概率模型,考虑了邻里宜居性的空间相互依赖性。我们的研究结果——考虑到内生性和空间自相关性——表明,较高的社区宜居性显著增加了选择积极出行方式的可能性(在最不适宜居住的社区和最适宜居住的社区之间增加了10个百分点)。我们的研究表明,即使是社区宜居性的适度改善,也可能有意义地改变出行行为。这些结果强调了创造更宜居环境以刺激积极(休闲)旅行和间接促进健康和可持续生活方式的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书