Paying into poverty? Out-of-pocket payments for home care and risk of catastrophic expenditures and poverty in Europe

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Journal of the Economics of Ageing Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jeoa.2026.100647
Ricardo Rodrigues , Jonathan Cylus , Megumi Rosenberg , Sarah Barber
{"title":"Paying into poverty? Out-of-pocket payments for home care and risk of catastrophic expenditures and poverty in Europe","authors":"Ricardo Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Jonathan Cylus ,&nbsp;Megumi Rosenberg ,&nbsp;Sarah Barber","doi":"10.1016/j.jeoa.2026.100647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper estimates the headcount of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment among users of home care aged 60 and older across 14 European countries and investigates which system-level characteristics mitigate the risk of financial hardship. We use a pooled sample of home care service users from the Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), for waves 5 and 6, the latest waves for which data on out-of-pocket (OOP) payments are available. Information on system-level characteristics that influence OOP payments were gathered through literature search and expert interviews. Headcounts of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment were estimated using the ‘capacity to pay’ method, supplemented by multivariate statistical analyses of individual and system-level characteristics associated with each outcome. Southern European countries have the highest headcount of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment due to OOP payments for home care. Catastrophic expenditures are concentrated on the poorest in all countries analysed. Consumption smoothing using accumulated wealth can reduce the risk of catastrophic expenditure but would have more muted effects on the risk of impoverishment, due to limited wealth accumulation among individuals most at risk of poverty. Different system-level characteristics or policies have the potential to protect individuals against catastrophic payments and impoverishment. Caps on OOP payments, higher public expenditure on LTC and means tests are all associated with lower risk of catastrophic expenditures. Higher public expenditure on LTC and caps on OOP payments reduce the risk of impoverishment due to OOP payments, while means tests only affect poverty intensity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Economics of Ageing","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Economics of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212828X26000307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper estimates the headcount of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment among users of home care aged 60 and older across 14 European countries and investigates which system-level characteristics mitigate the risk of financial hardship. We use a pooled sample of home care service users from the Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), for waves 5 and 6, the latest waves for which data on out-of-pocket (OOP) payments are available. Information on system-level characteristics that influence OOP payments were gathered through literature search and expert interviews. Headcounts of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment were estimated using the ‘capacity to pay’ method, supplemented by multivariate statistical analyses of individual and system-level characteristics associated with each outcome. Southern European countries have the highest headcount of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment due to OOP payments for home care. Catastrophic expenditures are concentrated on the poorest in all countries analysed. Consumption smoothing using accumulated wealth can reduce the risk of catastrophic expenditure but would have more muted effects on the risk of impoverishment, due to limited wealth accumulation among individuals most at risk of poverty. Different system-level characteristics or policies have the potential to protect individuals against catastrophic payments and impoverishment. Caps on OOP payments, higher public expenditure on LTC and means tests are all associated with lower risk of catastrophic expenditures. Higher public expenditure on LTC and caps on OOP payments reduce the risk of impoverishment due to OOP payments, while means tests only affect poverty intensity.
为贫困买单?欧洲家庭护理的自付费用以及灾难性支出和贫困的风险
本文估计了14个欧洲国家60岁及以上家庭护理用户的灾难性支出和贫困人数,并调查了哪些系统级别的特征减轻了经济困难的风险。我们使用了来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的家庭护理服务用户的汇总样本,用于第5波和第6波,这是可获得自费支付(OOP)数据的最新波。通过文献检索和专家访谈收集了影响面向对象支付的系统级特征的信息。使用“支付能力”方法估计灾难性支出和贫困的人数,并辅以与每个结果相关的个人和系统级特征的多元统计分析。南欧国家的灾难性支出和贫困人数最高,这是由于家庭护理的OOP支付。在所分析的所有国家中,灾难性支出集中在最贫穷的国家。利用积累的财富进行消费平滑可以降低灾难性支出的风险,但对贫困风险的影响更为微弱,因为最有贫困风险的个人的财富积累有限。不同的系统层面特征或政策有可能保护个人免受灾难性支付和贫困。对OOP付款设置上限、提高长期服务服务的公共支出和经济状况调查,都与较低的灾难性支出风险有关。提高长期援助服务的公共支出和对面向对象付款设置上限,可减少因面向对象付款而导致贫困的风险,而经济状况调查只会影响贫困程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Economics of Ageing (JEoA) is an international academic journal that publishes original theoretical and empirical research dealing with the interaction between demographic change and the economy. JEoA encompasses both microeconomic and macroeconomic perspectives and offers a platform for the discussion of topics including labour, health, and family economics, social security, income distribution, social mobility, immigration, productivity, structural change, economic growth and development. JEoA also solicits papers that have a policy focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书