Daily life after the death of a loved one: A systematic review of daily diary and ecological momentary assessment studies

IF 4.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Turan Deniz Ergun , Mustafa Anil Topal , Peter M. ten Klooster , Gerben J. Westerhof , Ernst T. Bohlmeijer , Lonneke I.M. Lenferink
{"title":"Daily life after the death of a loved one: A systematic review of daily diary and ecological momentary assessment studies","authors":"Turan Deniz Ergun ,&nbsp;Mustafa Anil Topal ,&nbsp;Peter M. ten Klooster ,&nbsp;Gerben J. Westerhof ,&nbsp;Ernst T. Bohlmeijer ,&nbsp;Lonneke I.M. Lenferink","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchp.2026.100693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The death of a loved one is a common yet potentially traumatic event that can impact bereaved people’s daily lives substantially. However, bereavement experiences have been investigated mostly with cross-sectional surveys, which provide limited information about bereaved people’s everyday functioning. Intensive longitudinal methods (ILM) that collect self-reports once (daily diary; DD) or multiple times (ecological momentary assessment; EMA) a day allow researchers to examine momentary variations in bereaved people’s everyday experiences. In this preregistered study, we aimed to systematically review studies that investigated the daily life of bereaved people using ILM. We searched for English peer-reviewed journal articles in Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO. After title, abstract, and full-text screening of 230 records, 18 articles were included in the final review. Fourteen studies used DD, and four used EMA designs. Studies examined four topics: a) the acceptability, feasibility, and reactivity effects of ILM among bereaved people, b) emotions and emotion regulation strategies, c) sleep quality, and d) romantic relationships. While the acceptability, feasibility, and reactivity effects of ILM were investigated by both DD and EMA studies, the latter three topics were examined only by DD studies. The studies show that DD and EMA are acceptable and feasible methods among bereaved people. DD studies showed that experiences of positive emotions and affectionate touch were related to better psychological outcomes, such as intimacy, while there were inconsistent associations between grief and sleep quality. ILMs appear to offer valuable yet largely untapped potential for capturing dynamic experiences of grief in bereavement research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47673,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","volume":"26 2","pages":"Article 100693"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S169726002600030X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The death of a loved one is a common yet potentially traumatic event that can impact bereaved people’s daily lives substantially. However, bereavement experiences have been investigated mostly with cross-sectional surveys, which provide limited information about bereaved people’s everyday functioning. Intensive longitudinal methods (ILM) that collect self-reports once (daily diary; DD) or multiple times (ecological momentary assessment; EMA) a day allow researchers to examine momentary variations in bereaved people’s everyday experiences. In this preregistered study, we aimed to systematically review studies that investigated the daily life of bereaved people using ILM. We searched for English peer-reviewed journal articles in Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO. After title, abstract, and full-text screening of 230 records, 18 articles were included in the final review. Fourteen studies used DD, and four used EMA designs. Studies examined four topics: a) the acceptability, feasibility, and reactivity effects of ILM among bereaved people, b) emotions and emotion regulation strategies, c) sleep quality, and d) romantic relationships. While the acceptability, feasibility, and reactivity effects of ILM were investigated by both DD and EMA studies, the latter three topics were examined only by DD studies. The studies show that DD and EMA are acceptable and feasible methods among bereaved people. DD studies showed that experiences of positive emotions and affectionate touch were related to better psychological outcomes, such as intimacy, while there were inconsistent associations between grief and sleep quality. ILMs appear to offer valuable yet largely untapped potential for capturing dynamic experiences of grief in bereavement research.
亲人去世后的日常生活:对日常日记和生态瞬间评估研究的系统回顾
亲人的死亡是一种常见但潜在的创伤性事件,会对失去亲人的人的日常生活产生重大影响。然而,对丧亲经历的调查大多是横断面调查,这对丧亲者的日常功能提供了有限的信息。密集的纵向方法(ILM)每天收集一次(每日日记;DD)或多次(生态瞬间评估;EMA)的自我报告,使研究人员能够检查失去亲人的人日常经历的瞬间变化。在这项预注册的研究中,我们旨在系统地回顾有关使用ILM的丧亲者日常生活的研究。我们在Scopus、PubMed和PsycINFO中搜索了英文同行评议的期刊文章。在对230篇文献进行标题、摘要和全文筛选后,最终纳入18篇文献。14项研究采用DD设计,4项采用EMA设计。研究考察了四个主题:a) ILM在丧亲者中的可接受性、可行性和反应性效应;b)情绪和情绪调节策略;c)睡眠质量;d)恋爱关系。虽然DD和EMA研究都研究了ILM的可接受性、可行性和反应性效应,但后三个主题仅由DD研究进行了研究。研究表明,DD和EMA是丧亲者可接受和可行的方法。DD研究表明,积极情绪和深情触摸的经历与更好的心理结果有关,比如亲密关系,而悲伤和睡眠质量之间的联系并不一致。在丧亲研究中,ilm似乎为捕捉悲伤的动态体验提供了宝贵的,但在很大程度上尚未开发的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology is dedicated to publishing manuscripts with a strong emphasis on both basic and applied research, encompassing experimental, clinical, and theoretical contributions that advance the fields of Clinical and Health Psychology. With a focus on four core domains—clinical psychology and psychotherapy, psychopathology, health psychology, and clinical neurosciences—the IJCHP seeks to provide a comprehensive platform for scholarly discourse and innovation. The journal accepts Original Articles (empirical studies) and Review Articles. Manuscripts submitted to IJCHP should be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere. All signing authors must unanimously agree on the submitted version of the manuscript. By submitting their work, authors agree to transfer their copyrights to the Journal for the duration of the editorial process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书