Investigating the acceptability and validity of a novel VR paradigm that simulates auditory hallucinations

IF 4.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Donagh Seaver O'Leary, Pat Mulvaney, Laura Moore, Lera O’Connor, Brendan Rooney, Keith Gaynor
{"title":"Investigating the acceptability and validity of a novel VR paradigm that simulates auditory hallucinations","authors":"Donagh Seaver O'Leary,&nbsp;Pat Mulvaney,&nbsp;Laura Moore,&nbsp;Lera O’Connor,&nbsp;Brendan Rooney,&nbsp;Keith Gaynor","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchp.2026.100694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a growing use of Virtual Reality (VR) technologies in psychosis research and intervention. Validated VR simulations of psychotic-like experience have the potential to allow controlled manipulation of stimuli, reproducibility, and to isolate mechanisms of change in an ethical research framework. Although initial developments appear to be safe, qualitative reporting of participants’ experiences of VR simulated psychotic-like experiences is lacking. This paper proposes and demonstrates an ethically grounded framework for evaluating the acceptability and validity of an immersive VR experience that simulates auditory hallucinations (VR-sAH) based upon the prototypical content of auditory hallucinations described by people with lived experience. Sixty-eight non-clinical participants undertook an experimental trial involving VR-sAH. Validity of the VR-sAH was assessed by combined assessment of qualitative reports and psychophysiological responses. Non-acceptability was operationalised as drop-outs, indications of distress during the experiment, and self-reported Subjective Units of Distress post-experiment. Following the experiment, a subset of participants (n = 29) undertook semi-structured interviews guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Results indicated that the VR-sAH produced a believable and affectively salient analogue of auditory hallucinatory experiences. Statistically significant reductions in heart rate variability validated participants’ self-reported embodied immersion in the VR-sAH. Semi-structured interviews and quantitative acceptability criteria indicated that the VR-sAH was an acceptable research tool. However, this sentiment was subject to important caveats to consider: including participants with psychosis and other mental health issues, and the importance of integrity and transparency on the part of the researcher team. Although VR-sAHs do not replicate the full phenomenology of clinical auditory hallucinations, they may provide ethically manageable and experimentally controllable analogues of perceptual and cognitive processes relevant to psychosis research, particularly during early-stage development in non-clinical populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47673,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","volume":"26 2","pages":"Article 100694"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260026000311","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing use of Virtual Reality (VR) technologies in psychosis research and intervention. Validated VR simulations of psychotic-like experience have the potential to allow controlled manipulation of stimuli, reproducibility, and to isolate mechanisms of change in an ethical research framework. Although initial developments appear to be safe, qualitative reporting of participants’ experiences of VR simulated psychotic-like experiences is lacking. This paper proposes and demonstrates an ethically grounded framework for evaluating the acceptability and validity of an immersive VR experience that simulates auditory hallucinations (VR-sAH) based upon the prototypical content of auditory hallucinations described by people with lived experience. Sixty-eight non-clinical participants undertook an experimental trial involving VR-sAH. Validity of the VR-sAH was assessed by combined assessment of qualitative reports and psychophysiological responses. Non-acceptability was operationalised as drop-outs, indications of distress during the experiment, and self-reported Subjective Units of Distress post-experiment. Following the experiment, a subset of participants (n = 29) undertook semi-structured interviews guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Results indicated that the VR-sAH produced a believable and affectively salient analogue of auditory hallucinatory experiences. Statistically significant reductions in heart rate variability validated participants’ self-reported embodied immersion in the VR-sAH. Semi-structured interviews and quantitative acceptability criteria indicated that the VR-sAH was an acceptable research tool. However, this sentiment was subject to important caveats to consider: including participants with psychosis and other mental health issues, and the importance of integrity and transparency on the part of the researcher team. Although VR-sAHs do not replicate the full phenomenology of clinical auditory hallucinations, they may provide ethically manageable and experimentally controllable analogues of perceptual and cognitive processes relevant to psychosis research, particularly during early-stage development in non-clinical populations.
研究一种模拟幻听的新型虚拟现实范式的可接受性和有效性
虚拟现实(VR)技术在精神病研究和干预中的应用越来越多。经过验证的类似精神病体验的VR模拟有可能允许对刺激的可控操纵,可重复性,并在伦理研究框架中隔离变化机制。虽然最初的发展似乎是安全的,但缺乏对参与者虚拟现实模拟精神病体验的定性报告。本文提出并论证了一个基于伦理的框架,用于评估模拟幻听(VR- sah)的沉浸式VR体验的可接受性和有效性,该体验基于有生活经验的人描述的幻听的原型内容。68名非临床参与者参与了一项涉及VR-sAH的实验试验。通过定性报告和心理生理反应的综合评估来评估VR-sAH的有效性。不可接受性被操作为退学,实验期间的痛苦迹象,以及实验后自我报告的主观痛苦单位。实验结束后,一部分参与者(n = 29)在可接受性理论框架的指导下进行了半结构化访谈。结果表明,VR-sAH产生了听觉幻觉体验的可信和情感上显著的模拟。统计上显著的心率变异性降低证实了参与者在VR-sAH中自我报告的体现沉浸。半结构化访谈和定量可接受性标准表明,VR-sAH是一种可接受的研究工具。然而,这种观点需要考虑一些重要的注意事项:包括患有精神病和其他精神健康问题的参与者,以及研究团队完整性和透明度的重要性。虽然VR-sAHs不能复制临床幻听的全部现象学,但它们可能提供与精神病研究相关的感知和认知过程的伦理上可管理和实验上可控的类似物,特别是在非临床人群的早期发展阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology is dedicated to publishing manuscripts with a strong emphasis on both basic and applied research, encompassing experimental, clinical, and theoretical contributions that advance the fields of Clinical and Health Psychology. With a focus on four core domains—clinical psychology and psychotherapy, psychopathology, health psychology, and clinical neurosciences—the IJCHP seeks to provide a comprehensive platform for scholarly discourse and innovation. The journal accepts Original Articles (empirical studies) and Review Articles. Manuscripts submitted to IJCHP should be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere. All signing authors must unanimously agree on the submitted version of the manuscript. By submitting their work, authors agree to transfer their copyrights to the Journal for the duration of the editorial process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书