Incorporating the Luce–Krantz threshold model into cultural consensus theory for ordinal categorical data

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Journal of Mathematical Psychology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jmp.2026.102990
Tzu-Yao Lin , Yung-Fong Hsu
{"title":"Incorporating the Luce–Krantz threshold model into cultural consensus theory for ordinal categorical data","authors":"Tzu-Yao Lin ,&nbsp;Yung-Fong Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2026.102990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cultural consensus theory (CCT), developed by Batchelder and colleagues in the mid-1980s, is a cognitively driven methodology to assess informants’ consensus in which the culturally correct answers are unknown to researchers a priori. The primary goal of CCT is to uncover the cultural knowledge, preferences or beliefs shared by group members. One of the models within CCT, the <em>general Condorcet model</em> (GCM), is designed for dichotomous response data (e.g., true/false) collected from a group of informants who share a common body of cultural knowledge. In many applied settings, however, responses are not limited to binary judgments; instead, informants often convey varying degrees of confidence, which are naturally represented using ordinal response formats such as Likert-type scales. To address this, we propose an extension of the GCM, termed the <em>general Condorcet–Luce–Krantz</em> (GCLK) model, which integrates the GCM with Luce–Krantz threshold theory to accommodate ordinal categorical responses. The model is intended for settings in which the latent cultural answer remains dichotomous while the observed response process is ordinal. In addition to finding out the consensus truth to the items, the GCLK also estimates other response characteristics, including the item-difficulty levels, informants’ competency levels, and guessing biases. We introduce the multicultural version of the GCLK that can help researchers detect the number of cultures for a given dataset. We use the hierarchical Bayesian modeling approach and the Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling method for estimation. A posterior predictive check is established to test the central assumptions of the model. Through a series of simulation studies, we provide a proof of concept by evaluating the applicability of the GCLK and demonstrate that the model achieves good parameter recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 102990"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022249626000210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural consensus theory (CCT), developed by Batchelder and colleagues in the mid-1980s, is a cognitively driven methodology to assess informants’ consensus in which the culturally correct answers are unknown to researchers a priori. The primary goal of CCT is to uncover the cultural knowledge, preferences or beliefs shared by group members. One of the models within CCT, the general Condorcet model (GCM), is designed for dichotomous response data (e.g., true/false) collected from a group of informants who share a common body of cultural knowledge. In many applied settings, however, responses are not limited to binary judgments; instead, informants often convey varying degrees of confidence, which are naturally represented using ordinal response formats such as Likert-type scales. To address this, we propose an extension of the GCM, termed the general Condorcet–Luce–Krantz (GCLK) model, which integrates the GCM with Luce–Krantz threshold theory to accommodate ordinal categorical responses. The model is intended for settings in which the latent cultural answer remains dichotomous while the observed response process is ordinal. In addition to finding out the consensus truth to the items, the GCLK also estimates other response characteristics, including the item-difficulty levels, informants’ competency levels, and guessing biases. We introduce the multicultural version of the GCLK that can help researchers detect the number of cultures for a given dataset. We use the hierarchical Bayesian modeling approach and the Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling method for estimation. A posterior predictive check is established to test the central assumptions of the model. Through a series of simulation studies, we provide a proof of concept by evaluating the applicability of the GCLK and demonstrate that the model achieves good parameter recovery.
将Luce-Krantz阈值模型纳入有序分类数据的文化共识理论
文化共识理论(CCT)是Batchelder和他的同事在20世纪80年代中期发展起来的,是一种认知驱动的方法,用于评估告密者的共识,在这种共识中,研究人员先验地不知道文化上正确的答案。CCT的主要目标是揭示群体成员共有的文化知识、偏好或信仰。CCT中的一个模型是通用孔多塞模型(general Condorcet model, GCM),该模型是为从一组拥有共同文化知识的举报人那里收集的二分反应数据(例如,真/假)而设计的。然而,在许多应用环境中,反应并不局限于二元判断;相反,告密者经常传达不同程度的信心,这自然是用有序的回答格式来表示的,比如李克特类型的量表。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了GCM的扩展,称为通用孔多塞-卢斯-克兰茨(GCLK)模型,该模型将GCM与卢斯-克兰茨阈值理论相结合,以适应有序的分类响应。该模型适用于潜在的文化答案仍然是二分的,而观察到的反应过程是有序的。除了找出问题的共识真相外,GCLK还估计其他反应特征,包括项目难度水平,举报人的能力水平和猜测偏差。我们介绍了GCLK的多元文化版本,它可以帮助研究人员检测给定数据集的文化数量。我们使用层次贝叶斯建模方法和马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗抽样方法进行估计。建立了一个后验预测检验来检验模型的中心假设。通过一系列的仿真研究,我们通过评估GCLK的适用性提供了概念验证,并证明该模型获得了良好的参数恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Journal of Mathematical Psychology 医学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
20.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematical Psychology includes articles, monographs and reviews, notes and commentaries, and book reviews in all areas of mathematical psychology. Empirical and theoretical contributions are equally welcome. Areas of special interest include, but are not limited to, fundamental measurement and psychological process models, such as those based upon neural network or information processing concepts. A partial listing of substantive areas covered include sensation and perception, psychophysics, learning and memory, problem solving, judgment and decision-making, and motivation. The Journal of Mathematical Psychology is affiliated with the Society for Mathematical Psychology. Research Areas include: • Models for sensation and perception, learning, memory and thinking • Fundamental measurement and scaling • Decision making • Neural modeling and networks • Psychophysics and signal detection • Neuropsychological theories • Psycholinguistics • Motivational dynamics • Animal behavior • Psychometric theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书