Comparative life cycle assessment of Rankine-based Carnot batteries and lithium-ion batteries for grid-scale energy storage

IF 11.5
Green Energy and Resources Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.gerr.2026.100184
Hannah Romberg , Matthias Mersch , Christian Vering , Christos N. Markides , Dirk Müller
{"title":"Comparative life cycle assessment of Rankine-based Carnot batteries and lithium-ion batteries for grid-scale energy storage","authors":"Hannah Romberg ,&nbsp;Matthias Mersch ,&nbsp;Christian Vering ,&nbsp;Christos N. Markides ,&nbsp;Dirk Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.gerr.2026.100184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carnot batteries are investigated as a potential alternative to electro-chemical batteries for grid-scale electricity storage, which is a crucial element to the decarbonisation of energy systems via variable renewable energy sources. In this work, a comprehensive life cycle assessment of the construction and end-of-life phases of two Rankine-based Carnot battery system configurations is presented, comparing water and thermal oil as hot thermal energy storage fluid. Both are benchmarked against lithium-ion batteries as the most common electro-chemical battery alternative. To enhance the robustness of the analysis, uncertainties in the input parameters and life cycle inventory data are explicitly considered and analysed. The deterministic results show that the Carnot battery using water as hot storage fluid performs best in 13 of 18 environmental impact categories. For example, the climate change impact is up to 23% lower. Thermal energy storage systems are identified as the dominant contributors, accounting for more than 50% of the environmental impact across most impact categories. The stochastic results considering uncertainty show that the Carnot battery with water tends to have environmental impacts on par with lithium-ion batteries, while the Carnot battery with thermal oil tends to perform the worst.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100597,"journal":{"name":"Green Energy and Resources","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100184"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Energy and Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949720526000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carnot batteries are investigated as a potential alternative to electro-chemical batteries for grid-scale electricity storage, which is a crucial element to the decarbonisation of energy systems via variable renewable energy sources. In this work, a comprehensive life cycle assessment of the construction and end-of-life phases of two Rankine-based Carnot battery system configurations is presented, comparing water and thermal oil as hot thermal energy storage fluid. Both are benchmarked against lithium-ion batteries as the most common electro-chemical battery alternative. To enhance the robustness of the analysis, uncertainties in the input parameters and life cycle inventory data are explicitly considered and analysed. The deterministic results show that the Carnot battery using water as hot storage fluid performs best in 13 of 18 environmental impact categories. For example, the climate change impact is up to 23% lower. Thermal energy storage systems are identified as the dominant contributors, accounting for more than 50% of the environmental impact across most impact categories. The stochastic results considering uncertainty show that the Carnot battery with water tends to have environmental impacts on par with lithium-ion batteries, while the Carnot battery with thermal oil tends to perform the worst.
基于朗肯的卡诺电池和锂离子电池用于电网规模储能的寿命周期比较评估
卡诺电池被研究作为电网规模电力存储的电化学电池的潜在替代品,这是通过可变可再生能源实现能源系统脱碳的关键因素。在这项工作中,对两种基于朗肯的卡诺电池系统配置的构建和寿命结束阶段进行了全面的生命周期评估,并将水和导热油作为热储能流体进行了比较。两者都以锂离子电池为基准,作为最常见的电化学电池替代品。为了提高分析的鲁棒性,明确考虑和分析了输入参数和生命周期库存数据中的不确定性。确定性结果表明,使用水作为储热流体的卡诺电池在18个环境影响类别中的13个中表现最佳。例如,气候变化的影响要低23%。热能储存系统被确定为主要贡献者,在大多数影响类别中占环境影响的50%以上。考虑不确定性的随机结果表明,含水卡诺电池对环境的影响与锂离子电池相当,而含导热油卡诺电池对环境的影响最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书