A clause-based framework for evaluating AI-assisted SOP generation in an ISO-aligned clinical laboratory: a proof-of-concept study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ahmed Naseer Kaftan
{"title":"A clause-based framework for evaluating AI-assisted SOP generation in an ISO-aligned clinical laboratory: a proof-of-concept study.","authors":"Ahmed Naseer Kaftan","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2026.2684025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are foundational to quality assurance in ISO-accredited clinical laboratories, but manual SOP development is labor-intensive and prone to error. With the emergence of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT-5, there is growing interest in their potential to generate compliant, context-specific laboratory documentation. To test a regulatory-aligned, clause-based evaluation framework for assessing whether ChatGPT-5 can generate context-aware, fit-for-purpose SOP drafts within a real ISO-aligned laboratory environment. In a single-site, paired proof-of-concept study, 10 high-priority SOPs were generated using ChatGPT-5 and compared with matched SOPs written by experienced laboratory professionals. AI prompts were enriched with laboratory-specific inputs (e.g. operator manuals, reagent inserts and LIS codes). SOPs were evaluated using a seven-domain ISO/CLSI-aligned rubric, a laboratory-specificity audit, clause-mapping checklists, content validity indexing and usability testing by junior staff. Inter-rater reliability and paired non-parametric statistics were applied. AI-assisted SOPs demonstrated higher median quality scores, more complete ISO clause referencing, improved traceability and stronger lifecycle conformity compared with manual SOPs. Drafting time was reduced by approximately 91%. Expert reviewers showed excellent agreement (ICC = 0.91), and content validity indices exceeded established thresholds. Junior staff rated AI-assisted SOPs as clearer and more independently usable. Context-anchored prompts improved laboratory-specific relevance. This study demonstrates a replicable, clause-based framework for evaluating AI-assisted SOP generation within a regulated laboratory context. While findings support the feasibility of AI as a documentation co-author under expert oversight, external multi-center validation is required before broader regulatory or clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"415-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2026.2684025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are foundational to quality assurance in ISO-accredited clinical laboratories, but manual SOP development is labor-intensive and prone to error. With the emergence of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT-5, there is growing interest in their potential to generate compliant, context-specific laboratory documentation. To test a regulatory-aligned, clause-based evaluation framework for assessing whether ChatGPT-5 can generate context-aware, fit-for-purpose SOP drafts within a real ISO-aligned laboratory environment. In a single-site, paired proof-of-concept study, 10 high-priority SOPs were generated using ChatGPT-5 and compared with matched SOPs written by experienced laboratory professionals. AI prompts were enriched with laboratory-specific inputs (e.g. operator manuals, reagent inserts and LIS codes). SOPs were evaluated using a seven-domain ISO/CLSI-aligned rubric, a laboratory-specificity audit, clause-mapping checklists, content validity indexing and usability testing by junior staff. Inter-rater reliability and paired non-parametric statistics were applied. AI-assisted SOPs demonstrated higher median quality scores, more complete ISO clause referencing, improved traceability and stronger lifecycle conformity compared with manual SOPs. Drafting time was reduced by approximately 91%. Expert reviewers showed excellent agreement (ICC = 0.91), and content validity indices exceeded established thresholds. Junior staff rated AI-assisted SOPs as clearer and more independently usable. Context-anchored prompts improved laboratory-specific relevance. This study demonstrates a replicable, clause-based framework for evaluating AI-assisted SOP generation within a regulated laboratory context. While findings support the feasibility of AI as a documentation co-author under expert oversight, external multi-center validation is required before broader regulatory or clinical adoption.

在符合iso标准的临床实验室中评估人工智能辅助SOP生成的基于条款的框架:概念验证研究
标准操作程序(SOP)是iso认证临床实验室质量保证的基础,但手动SOP开发是劳动密集型的,容易出错。随着大型语言模型(llm)的出现,例如ChatGPT-5,人们对它们生成兼容的、特定于上下文的实验室文档的潜力越来越感兴趣。为了测试一个符合法规的、基于条款的评估框架,以评估ChatGPT-5是否可以在真实的iso实验室环境中生成上下文感知的、适合用途的SOP草案。在一项单站点、配对的概念验证研究中,使用ChatGPT-5生成了10个高优先级sop,并与经验丰富的实验室专业人员编写的匹配sop进行了比较。人工智能提示丰富了实验室特定的输入(例如操作人员手册、试剂说明书和LIS代码)。标准操作程序的评估使用了符合ISO/ clsi的七域标准、实验室特异性审计、条款映射检查表、内容有效性索引和初级工作人员的可用性测试。评估间信度和配对非参数统计应用。与手工sop相比,ai辅助的sop具有更高的中位质量分数,更完整的ISO条款引用,更好的可追溯性和更强的生命周期符合性。起草时间减少了约91%。专家评审结果一致(ICC = 0.91),内容效度指标均超过设定阈值。初级员工认为人工智能辅助的sop更清晰,更独立可用。情境锚定提示改进了实验室特定相关性。本研究展示了一个可复制的、基于条款的框架,用于在规范的实验室环境中评估人工智能辅助SOP生成。虽然研究结果支持人工智能在专家监督下作为文件共同作者的可行性,但在更广泛的监管或临床采用之前,需要外部多中心验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书