Deep learning reconstruction improves appendix visualization on pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a single-center experience.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s00247-026-06686-z
Sebastian Gallo-Bernal, Valeria Pena-Trujillo, Navaira Shoaib, Fedel Machado-Rivas, Teresa Victoria, Rimaz Khadir, Eugene Milshteyn, Arnaud Guidon, John Conklin, Michael S Gee
{"title":"Deep learning reconstruction improves appendix visualization on pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a single-center experience.","authors":"Sebastian Gallo-Bernal, Valeria Pena-Trujillo, Navaira Shoaib, Fedel Machado-Rivas, Teresa Victoria, Rimaz Khadir, Eugene Milshteyn, Arnaud Guidon, John Conklin, Michael S Gee","doi":"10.1007/s00247-026-06686-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thin-slice MRI may improve appendix visualization in children with suspected appendicitis, but reducing slice thickness decreases signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and can degrade image quality. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) enables denoising of thin-slice images and may mitigate these limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether 2-mm T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DLR improves appendix visualization and diagnostic performance compared with conventional 4-mm MRI in pediatric appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved, single-center study (January 2022-June 2025), 82 pediatric patients (mean age 9.6 years; age range 5-20 years) undergoing MRI for suspected appendicitis were included. MRI protocols contained both standard 4-mm and thin-slice 2-mm single-shot T2-weighted images; DLR was applied to 2-mm images (2-mm+DLR). Three blinded radiologists independently assessed paired series for appendix visualization, confidence, appendicitis diagnosis, ancillary findings, and overall image quality. Objective SNR was measured in psoas muscle, bladder, and fat. Diagnostic performance was calculated against surgical or clinical reference standards using paired statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first 16 exploratory cases, quantitative analysis showed that the signal-to-noise ratio of 2-mm+DLR images was comparable to that of standard 4-mm images. Across the full cohort, pooled analysis showed improved appendix visualization with 2-mm+DLR compared with standard 4-mm MRI (88.2% [217/246] vs 83.3% [205/246], P=0.006). Overall diagnostic image quality was also higher with 2-mm+DLR (median 5 vs 4, P<0.001), while confidence in appendix visualization and appendicitis diagnosis was similar between techniques (both medians 4, P>0.1). Exploratory pooled diagnostic performance numerically favored 2-mm+DLR, with higher sensitivity (89% [78/87] vs 81% [71/87]) and accuracy (89% [218/246] vs 86% [210/246]), although paired comparisons did not reach statistical significance (Table 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLR-enhanced 2-mm MRI improves appendix visualization and overall diagnostic image quality in pediatric appendicitis without reducing reader confidence or specificity. Thin-slice DLR MRI supports improved depiction of the appendix and alternative abdominal pathology in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2468-2477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-026-06686-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thin-slice MRI may improve appendix visualization in children with suspected appendicitis, but reducing slice thickness decreases signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and can degrade image quality. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) enables denoising of thin-slice images and may mitigate these limitations.

Objective: To evaluate whether 2-mm T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DLR improves appendix visualization and diagnostic performance compared with conventional 4-mm MRI in pediatric appendicitis.

Materials and methods: In this prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved, single-center study (January 2022-June 2025), 82 pediatric patients (mean age 9.6 years; age range 5-20 years) undergoing MRI for suspected appendicitis were included. MRI protocols contained both standard 4-mm and thin-slice 2-mm single-shot T2-weighted images; DLR was applied to 2-mm images (2-mm+DLR). Three blinded radiologists independently assessed paired series for appendix visualization, confidence, appendicitis diagnosis, ancillary findings, and overall image quality. Objective SNR was measured in psoas muscle, bladder, and fat. Diagnostic performance was calculated against surgical or clinical reference standards using paired statistical tests.

Results: In the first 16 exploratory cases, quantitative analysis showed that the signal-to-noise ratio of 2-mm+DLR images was comparable to that of standard 4-mm images. Across the full cohort, pooled analysis showed improved appendix visualization with 2-mm+DLR compared with standard 4-mm MRI (88.2% [217/246] vs 83.3% [205/246], P=0.006). Overall diagnostic image quality was also higher with 2-mm+DLR (median 5 vs 4, P<0.001), while confidence in appendix visualization and appendicitis diagnosis was similar between techniques (both medians 4, P>0.1). Exploratory pooled diagnostic performance numerically favored 2-mm+DLR, with higher sensitivity (89% [78/87] vs 81% [71/87]) and accuracy (89% [218/246] vs 86% [210/246]), although paired comparisons did not reach statistical significance (Table 4).

Conclusion: DLR-enhanced 2-mm MRI improves appendix visualization and overall diagnostic image quality in pediatric appendicitis without reducing reader confidence or specificity. Thin-slice DLR MRI supports improved depiction of the appendix and alternative abdominal pathology in children.

深度学习重建改善儿童磁共振成像(MRI)阑尾可视化:单中心体验。
背景:薄层MRI可改善疑似阑尾炎患儿阑尾的显像,但薄层厚度降低信噪比(SNR),降低图像质量。深度学习重建(DLR)可以实现薄层图像的去噪,并可能减轻这些限制。目的:评价2毫米t2加权磁共振成像(MRI)与常规4毫米磁共振成像相比,是否能改善小儿阑尾炎的阑尾显示和诊断性能。材料和方法:在这项经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性单中心研究(2022年1月- 2025年6月)中,纳入了82例因疑似阑尾炎接受MRI检查的儿童患者(平均年龄9.6岁,年龄范围5-20岁)。MRI方案包含标准4毫米和薄层2毫米单发t2加权图像;DLR应用于2mm图像(2mm +DLR)。三位盲法放射科医师独立评估配对系列的阑尾可视化、置信度、阑尾炎诊断、辅助发现和整体图像质量。目的测定腰肌、膀胱、脂肪组织的信噪比。采用配对统计检验,根据手术或临床参考标准计算诊断性能。结果:在前16例探索性病例中,定量分析显示2mm +DLR图像的信噪比与标准4mm图像相当。在整个队列中,合并分析显示,与标准4-mm MRI相比,2-mm+DLR可改善阑尾可视化(88.2% [217/246]vs 83.3% [205/246], P=0.006)。2mm +DLR的总体诊断图像质量也更高(中位数5 vs 4, P0.1)。探索性合并诊断性能在数值上倾向于2-mm+DLR,具有更高的灵敏度(89%[78/87]对81%[71/87])和准确性(89%[218/246]对86%[210/246]),尽管配对比较没有达到统计学意义(表4)。结论:dlr增强的2mm MRI提高了儿童阑尾炎的阑尾可视化和整体诊断图像质量,而不降低读者的信心和特异性。薄层DLR MRI支持对儿童阑尾和其他腹部病理的改进描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书