Sebastian Gallo-Bernal, Valeria Pena-Trujillo, Navaira Shoaib, Fedel Machado-Rivas, Teresa Victoria, Rimaz Khadir, Eugene Milshteyn, Arnaud Guidon, John Conklin, Michael S Gee
{"title":"Deep learning reconstruction improves appendix visualization on pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a single-center experience.","authors":"Sebastian Gallo-Bernal, Valeria Pena-Trujillo, Navaira Shoaib, Fedel Machado-Rivas, Teresa Victoria, Rimaz Khadir, Eugene Milshteyn, Arnaud Guidon, John Conklin, Michael S Gee","doi":"10.1007/s00247-026-06686-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thin-slice MRI may improve appendix visualization in children with suspected appendicitis, but reducing slice thickness decreases signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and can degrade image quality. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) enables denoising of thin-slice images and may mitigate these limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether 2-mm T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DLR improves appendix visualization and diagnostic performance compared with conventional 4-mm MRI in pediatric appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved, single-center study (January 2022-June 2025), 82 pediatric patients (mean age 9.6 years; age range 5-20 years) undergoing MRI for suspected appendicitis were included. MRI protocols contained both standard 4-mm and thin-slice 2-mm single-shot T2-weighted images; DLR was applied to 2-mm images (2-mm+DLR). Three blinded radiologists independently assessed paired series for appendix visualization, confidence, appendicitis diagnosis, ancillary findings, and overall image quality. Objective SNR was measured in psoas muscle, bladder, and fat. Diagnostic performance was calculated against surgical or clinical reference standards using paired statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first 16 exploratory cases, quantitative analysis showed that the signal-to-noise ratio of 2-mm+DLR images was comparable to that of standard 4-mm images. Across the full cohort, pooled analysis showed improved appendix visualization with 2-mm+DLR compared with standard 4-mm MRI (88.2% [217/246] vs 83.3% [205/246], P=0.006). Overall diagnostic image quality was also higher with 2-mm+DLR (median 5 vs 4, P<0.001), while confidence in appendix visualization and appendicitis diagnosis was similar between techniques (both medians 4, P>0.1). Exploratory pooled diagnostic performance numerically favored 2-mm+DLR, with higher sensitivity (89% [78/87] vs 81% [71/87]) and accuracy (89% [218/246] vs 86% [210/246]), although paired comparisons did not reach statistical significance (Table 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLR-enhanced 2-mm MRI improves appendix visualization and overall diagnostic image quality in pediatric appendicitis without reducing reader confidence or specificity. Thin-slice DLR MRI supports improved depiction of the appendix and alternative abdominal pathology in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2468-2477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-026-06686-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Thin-slice MRI may improve appendix visualization in children with suspected appendicitis, but reducing slice thickness decreases signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and can degrade image quality. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) enables denoising of thin-slice images and may mitigate these limitations.
Objective: To evaluate whether 2-mm T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DLR improves appendix visualization and diagnostic performance compared with conventional 4-mm MRI in pediatric appendicitis.
Materials and methods: In this prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved, single-center study (January 2022-June 2025), 82 pediatric patients (mean age 9.6 years; age range 5-20 years) undergoing MRI for suspected appendicitis were included. MRI protocols contained both standard 4-mm and thin-slice 2-mm single-shot T2-weighted images; DLR was applied to 2-mm images (2-mm+DLR). Three blinded radiologists independently assessed paired series for appendix visualization, confidence, appendicitis diagnosis, ancillary findings, and overall image quality. Objective SNR was measured in psoas muscle, bladder, and fat. Diagnostic performance was calculated against surgical or clinical reference standards using paired statistical tests.
Results: In the first 16 exploratory cases, quantitative analysis showed that the signal-to-noise ratio of 2-mm+DLR images was comparable to that of standard 4-mm images. Across the full cohort, pooled analysis showed improved appendix visualization with 2-mm+DLR compared with standard 4-mm MRI (88.2% [217/246] vs 83.3% [205/246], P=0.006). Overall diagnostic image quality was also higher with 2-mm+DLR (median 5 vs 4, P<0.001), while confidence in appendix visualization and appendicitis diagnosis was similar between techniques (both medians 4, P>0.1). Exploratory pooled diagnostic performance numerically favored 2-mm+DLR, with higher sensitivity (89% [78/87] vs 81% [71/87]) and accuracy (89% [218/246] vs 86% [210/246]), although paired comparisons did not reach statistical significance (Table 4).
Conclusion: DLR-enhanced 2-mm MRI improves appendix visualization and overall diagnostic image quality in pediatric appendicitis without reducing reader confidence or specificity. Thin-slice DLR MRI supports improved depiction of the appendix and alternative abdominal pathology in children.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.