Association of the Naples prognostic score with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in U.S. patients with heart failure: a retrospective cohort study using NHANES 2001-2018.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ke Wang, Jinzhen Gong, Ziting Yuan, Ruiyan Wang, Mengyu He, Yuli Huang, Jing Zhou, Feng Wang
{"title":"Association of the Naples prognostic score with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in U.S. patients with heart failure: a retrospective cohort study using NHANES 2001-2018.","authors":"Ke Wang, Jinzhen Gong, Ziting Yuan, Ruiyan Wang, Mengyu He, Yuli Huang, Jing Zhou, Feng Wang","doi":"10.1186/s41043-026-01352-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) predicts mortality risk in heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the 2001-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), including 1,111 adults with HF. The NPS was calculated based on serum albumin (SA), total cholesterol (TC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). Mortality outcomes were ascertained through linkage with the National Death Index (NDI). Associations between NPS and all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) were evaluated using survey-weighted Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Over a median follow-up of 70 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36-114 months), 545 ACM and 202 CVM cases were documented. Compared with participants with an NPS of 0, those in the high-risk group (NPS: 3-4) had significantly increased risks of mortality, with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.63; P < 0.01) for ACM and 2.62 (95% CI, 1.20-5.74; P < 0.05) for CVM. These associations remained consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses, supporting the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher NPS was independently associated with increased risks of ACM and CVM among U.S. adults with HF. These findings suggest that NPS may serve as a useful prognostic marker; however, further validation in prospective clinical cohorts is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-026-01352-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) predicts mortality risk in heart failure (HF).

Methods and results: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the 2001-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), including 1,111 adults with HF. The NPS was calculated based on serum albumin (SA), total cholesterol (TC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). Mortality outcomes were ascertained through linkage with the National Death Index (NDI). Associations between NPS and all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) were evaluated using survey-weighted Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Over a median follow-up of 70 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36-114 months), 545 ACM and 202 CVM cases were documented. Compared with participants with an NPS of 0, those in the high-risk group (NPS: 3-4) had significantly increased risks of mortality, with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.63; P < 0.01) for ACM and 2.62 (95% CI, 1.20-5.74; P < 0.05) for CVM. These associations remained consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses, supporting the robustness of the results.

Conclusion: A higher NPS was independently associated with increased risks of ACM and CVM among U.S. adults with HF. These findings suggest that NPS may serve as a useful prognostic marker; however, further validation in prospective clinical cohorts is warranted.

那不勒斯预后评分与美国心力衰竭患者全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的关系:使用NHANES 2001-2018的回顾性队列研究
背景:那不勒斯预后评分(NPS)预测心力衰竭(HF)的死亡风险。方法和结果:本回顾性队列研究利用了2001-2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据,包括1111名心衰成人。NPS根据血清白蛋白(SA)、总胆固醇(TC)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)计算。死亡率结果通过与国家死亡指数(NDI)的联系来确定。使用调查加权Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier (KM)分析评估NPS与全因死亡率(ACM)和心血管死亡率(CVM)之间的关系。进行亚组分析和敏感性分析以评估研究结果的稳健性。中位随访70个月(四分位间距[IQR], 36-114个月),记录了545例ACM和202例CVM病例。与NPS为0的参与者相比,高危组(NPS: 3-4)的死亡风险显著增加,校正风险比(HRs)为2.53(95%可信区间[CI], 1.38-4.63; P结论:较高的NPS与美国成年HF患者ACM和CVM风险增加独立相关。这些发现表明,NPS可以作为一个有用的预后指标;然而,在前瞻性临床队列中进一步验证是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书