Maryam Mady, Christopher Henni, Taylor Pape, Omowunmi Sadik
{"title":"EXPRESS: Assessing Pain Sensitivity with COX-2 Biomarkers: A Novel Approach in Healthy Volunteers.","authors":"Maryam Mady, Christopher Henni, Taylor Pape, Omowunmi Sadik","doi":"10.1177/17448069261461222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantifying pain is challenging due to its subjective nature. An established baseline of COX-2 levels in healthy subjects under controlled thermal pain stimulation will help bridge subjective pain assessment and objective biological measurements. 34 healthy students (aged from 17 to 21 years) participated in two thermal-induced pain protocols: (i) a water bath (ranging from 29 to 47 °C), (ii) internal wrist stimulation via a TSA-II thermal probe. Pain assessment was assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS). A strong positive correlation was observed between temperature and VAS scores (Pearson's r = 0.94, p<0.001). Temperature and immersion time in the water bath protocol showed a strong inverse correlation (r=-0.95, p<0.001). The mean COX-2 levels in water bath and TSA-II experiments were 1.88 ± 0.81 ng/mL (95% CI: 1.62 to 2.14) and 2.16 ± 0.77 ng/mL (95% CI: 1.92 to 2.40), respectively. These values are 50 to 2000-fold lower than those reported in the prior emergency-room-based acute pain studies. Linear mixed-effects models demonstrated that temperature was the only significant predictor of VAS (p < 0.001), while COX-2 was not. Whereas, COX-2 expression was not explained by VAS or temperature, indicating stable baseline levels. This work has established an exploratory baseline study for COX-2 levels in healthy subjects. This stark contrast highlights the potential to discriminate between baseline healthy and pain states, representing a step toward the development of biomarker-based tools for assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19010,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Pain","volume":" ","pages":"17448069261461222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17448069261461222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantifying pain is challenging due to its subjective nature. An established baseline of COX-2 levels in healthy subjects under controlled thermal pain stimulation will help bridge subjective pain assessment and objective biological measurements. 34 healthy students (aged from 17 to 21 years) participated in two thermal-induced pain protocols: (i) a water bath (ranging from 29 to 47 °C), (ii) internal wrist stimulation via a TSA-II thermal probe. Pain assessment was assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS). A strong positive correlation was observed between temperature and VAS scores (Pearson's r = 0.94, p<0.001). Temperature and immersion time in the water bath protocol showed a strong inverse correlation (r=-0.95, p<0.001). The mean COX-2 levels in water bath and TSA-II experiments were 1.88 ± 0.81 ng/mL (95% CI: 1.62 to 2.14) and 2.16 ± 0.77 ng/mL (95% CI: 1.92 to 2.40), respectively. These values are 50 to 2000-fold lower than those reported in the prior emergency-room-based acute pain studies. Linear mixed-effects models demonstrated that temperature was the only significant predictor of VAS (p < 0.001), while COX-2 was not. Whereas, COX-2 expression was not explained by VAS or temperature, indicating stable baseline levels. This work has established an exploratory baseline study for COX-2 levels in healthy subjects. This stark contrast highlights the potential to discriminate between baseline healthy and pain states, representing a step toward the development of biomarker-based tools for assessment.
由于疼痛的主观性,量化疼痛是一项挑战。在受控热痛刺激下健康受试者的COX-2水平基线将有助于连接主观疼痛评估和客观生物学测量。34名健康学生(年龄从17岁到21岁)参加了两种热致疼痛方案:(i)水浴(温度范围从29°C到47°C), (ii)通过TSA-II热探针进行手腕内部刺激。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)进行疼痛评估。温度与VAS评分呈正相关(Pearson’s r = 0.94, p
期刊介绍:
Molecular Pain is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that considers manuscripts in pain research at the cellular, subcellular and molecular levels. Molecular Pain provides a forum for molecular pain scientists to communicate their research findings in a targeted manner to others in this important and growing field.