Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block vs lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy: a randomized pilot clinical trial.
Ravena O Mangabeira, Gabriel M Rodrigues, Clara L Moura, Vinícius J Moraes, Alice R de Oliveira, Alessandra Estrela-Lima, Vivian F Barbosa
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block vs lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy: a randomized pilot clinical trial.","authors":"Ravena O Mangabeira, Gabriel M Rodrigues, Clara L Moura, Vinícius J Moraes, Alice R de Oliveira, Alessandra Estrela-Lima, Vivian F Barbosa","doi":"10.1177/1098612X261460760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to compare analgesic and cardiopulmonary effects after bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and lumbosacral epidural (LsE) with levobupivacaine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy (OVH).MethodsA prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial was conducted. A total of 20 healthy female cats were allocated (1:1) to the LsE group (0.4 ml/kg 0.25% levobupivacaine) or the QLB group (0.3 ml/kg 0.25% levobupivacaine per hemiabdomen). Cats were premedicated with dexmedetomidine 3 µg/kg and meloxicam 0.1 mg/kg. Anesthesia was performed using propofol variable rate infusion (adjusted to clinical depth). Heart rate, respiratory rate, hemoglobin oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide and systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressures were recorded at seven standardized surgical time points. Postoperative pain (UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale) and sedation were assessed up to 6 h after surgery; methadone (0.25 mg/kg IM) was administered as rescue analgesia when indicated. Recovery milestones and mean propofol infusion rates were also compared. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, unpaired <i>t</i>-tests or non-parametric tests, as appropriate (<i>P</i> <0.05).ResultsNo significant between-group differences were detected for any cardiopulmonary variable (<i>P</i> >0.05), and no intraoperative rescue analgesia was required. Mean propofol infusion rates were similar (LsE 0.36 ± 0.07 vs QLB 0.39 ± 0.02 mg/kg/min; <i>P</i> = 0.0863). Postoperative pain scores did nor differ between groups. Only one cat in the QLB group required methadone at 6 h. Recovery milestones (extubation to standing: LsE 73 mins, QLB 79 mins; <i>P</i> = 0.4182) and sedation scores were comparable. No block-related complications or adverse events were observed.Conclusions and relevanceBilateral ultrasound-guided QLB with 0.25% levobupivacaine provided cardiopulmonary stability and early perioperative analgesic performance comparable to lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats premedicated with dexmedetomidine and meloxicam undergoing OVH, supporting its use as a clinical alternative, particularly when epidural access is contraindicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1098612X261460760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13379671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X261460760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to compare analgesic and cardiopulmonary effects after bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and lumbosacral epidural (LsE) with levobupivacaine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy (OVH).MethodsA prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial was conducted. A total of 20 healthy female cats were allocated (1:1) to the LsE group (0.4 ml/kg 0.25% levobupivacaine) or the QLB group (0.3 ml/kg 0.25% levobupivacaine per hemiabdomen). Cats were premedicated with dexmedetomidine 3 µg/kg and meloxicam 0.1 mg/kg. Anesthesia was performed using propofol variable rate infusion (adjusted to clinical depth). Heart rate, respiratory rate, hemoglobin oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide and systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressures were recorded at seven standardized surgical time points. Postoperative pain (UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale) and sedation were assessed up to 6 h after surgery; methadone (0.25 mg/kg IM) was administered as rescue analgesia when indicated. Recovery milestones and mean propofol infusion rates were also compared. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, unpaired t-tests or non-parametric tests, as appropriate (P <0.05).ResultsNo significant between-group differences were detected for any cardiopulmonary variable (P >0.05), and no intraoperative rescue analgesia was required. Mean propofol infusion rates were similar (LsE 0.36 ± 0.07 vs QLB 0.39 ± 0.02 mg/kg/min; P = 0.0863). Postoperative pain scores did nor differ between groups. Only one cat in the QLB group required methadone at 6 h. Recovery milestones (extubation to standing: LsE 73 mins, QLB 79 mins; P = 0.4182) and sedation scores were comparable. No block-related complications or adverse events were observed.Conclusions and relevanceBilateral ultrasound-guided QLB with 0.25% levobupivacaine provided cardiopulmonary stability and early perioperative analgesic performance comparable to lumbosacral epidural anesthesia in cats premedicated with dexmedetomidine and meloxicam undergoing OVH, supporting its use as a clinical alternative, particularly when epidural access is contraindicated.
期刊介绍:
JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.