The effect of stress ball use on stress, sleep quality, and comfort in individuals receiving hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Ayse Kacaroglu Vicdan, Dilek Gibyeli Genek
{"title":"The effect of stress ball use on stress, sleep quality, and comfort in individuals receiving hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ayse Kacaroglu Vicdan, Dilek Gibyeli Genek","doi":"10.1186/s12906-026-05429-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemodialysis often leads to various physiological, psychological, and social challenges for individuals receiving this treatment. This study was conducted to determine the effects of stress ball use on stress, sleep quality, and comfort levels in individuals receiving hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 57 patients (28 experimental, 29 control) receiving treatment at a hemodialysis unit in western Türkiye between February and April 2024. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling method from the eligible patient population. The stress ball intervention was administered three times weekly during hemodialysis sessions for 15 min each session, totaling 12 sessions. The control group received standard hemodialysis treatment and nursing care. The study data were collected using a Patient Assessment Form, the Perceived Stress Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Hemodialysis Comfort Scale Version II.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in pre-test PSS scores between the experimental and control groups (p > 0.05), whereas post-test scores were significantly lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05). For the PSQI, pre-test scores differed significantly between the groups (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in post-test scores (p > 0.05). Within-group analysis showed a significant decrease in the experimental group (p < 0.05), while no change was observed in the control group (p > 0.05). ANCOVA confirmed that adjusted post-test PSQI scores were lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05), indicating improved sleep quality. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in HDCS-II total or subscale scores at either measurement point (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conslusion: </strong>This study shows that the use of stress balls reduces the perceived stress levels of individuals receiving hemodialysis treatment while enhancing their sleep quality and comfort levels.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06835998). The date of registration is 2025-02-19 (Retrospectively registered).</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13317300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-026-05429-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hemodialysis often leads to various physiological, psychological, and social challenges for individuals receiving this treatment. This study was conducted to determine the effects of stress ball use on stress, sleep quality, and comfort levels in individuals receiving hemodialysis.

Methods: This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 57 patients (28 experimental, 29 control) receiving treatment at a hemodialysis unit in western Türkiye between February and April 2024. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling method from the eligible patient population. The stress ball intervention was administered three times weekly during hemodialysis sessions for 15 min each session, totaling 12 sessions. The control group received standard hemodialysis treatment and nursing care. The study data were collected using a Patient Assessment Form, the Perceived Stress Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Hemodialysis Comfort Scale Version II.

Results: There was no significant difference in pre-test PSS scores between the experimental and control groups (p > 0.05), whereas post-test scores were significantly lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05). For the PSQI, pre-test scores differed significantly between the groups (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in post-test scores (p > 0.05). Within-group analysis showed a significant decrease in the experimental group (p < 0.05), while no change was observed in the control group (p > 0.05). ANCOVA confirmed that adjusted post-test PSQI scores were lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05), indicating improved sleep quality. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in HDCS-II total or subscale scores at either measurement point (p > 0.05).

Conslusion: This study shows that the use of stress balls reduces the perceived stress levels of individuals receiving hemodialysis treatment while enhancing their sleep quality and comfort levels.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06835998). The date of registration is 2025-02-19 (Retrospectively registered).

使用压力球对接受血液透析的个体的压力、睡眠质量和舒适度的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:血液透析通常会给接受这种治疗的个体带来各种生理、心理和社会挑战。本研究旨在确定使用压力球对接受血液透析的个体的压力、睡眠质量和舒适度的影响。方法:该单盲随机对照试验于2024年2月至4月在约旦西部的一家血液透析单位接受治疗的57例患者(28例实验组,29例对照组)进行。参与者采用简单的随机抽样方法从符合条件的患者人群中选择。压力球干预在血液透析期间每周进行三次,每次15分钟,共12次。对照组患者给予标准血液透析治疗及护理。研究数据采用患者评估表、感知压力量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数和血液透析舒适量表II收集。结果:实验组与对照组的前测PSS评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05),后测PSS评分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。组内分析结果显示,实验组显著降低(p < 0.05)。ANCOVA证实实验组经校正后PSQI评分较低(p < 0.05)。结论:本研究表明,使用压力球降低了接受血液透析治疗的个体的感知压力水平,同时提高了他们的睡眠质量和舒适度。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06835998)。注册日期为2025-02-19(回顾性注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书