Improved Consensus Protocol for IoT Trust Management Systems

IET Blockchain Pub Date : 2026-06-05 DOI:10.1049/blc2.70038
Yumeng Huang, Xiuxia Tian
{"title":"Improved Consensus Protocol for IoT Trust Management Systems","authors":"Yumeng Huang,&nbsp;Xiuxia Tian","doi":"10.1049/blc2.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the rapid development of the internet of things (IoT), the security collaboration between devices poses higher demands on traditional trust management. Blockchain technology, due to its decentralisation and tamper-proof characteristics, has become an effective solution for building trustworthy IoT systems. However, traditional consensus protocols (like PBFT) face issues such as high communication overhead and insufficient scalability in IoT environments. In response, an improved consensus protocol, Improved Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (IPBFT), is proposed, which combines K-means to optimise node grouping, reducing network communication complexity, while also introducing a dynamic credit assessment mechanism to evaluate the trustworthiness of nodes and filter reliable consensus nodes. Finally, based on these two improvements, a trust system for IoT based on Hyperledger Fabric is designed and implemented. Experimental results show that compared to traditional PBFT, IPBFT reduces latency and communication complexity by over 50%, making it more suitable for large-scale IoT trust management scenarios and providing a new technical approach for efficient and trustworthy collaboration in blockchain applications within the IoT.</p>","PeriodicalId":100650,"journal":{"name":"IET Blockchain","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/blc2.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Blockchain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/blc2.70038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid development of the internet of things (IoT), the security collaboration between devices poses higher demands on traditional trust management. Blockchain technology, due to its decentralisation and tamper-proof characteristics, has become an effective solution for building trustworthy IoT systems. However, traditional consensus protocols (like PBFT) face issues such as high communication overhead and insufficient scalability in IoT environments. In response, an improved consensus protocol, Improved Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (IPBFT), is proposed, which combines K-means to optimise node grouping, reducing network communication complexity, while also introducing a dynamic credit assessment mechanism to evaluate the trustworthiness of nodes and filter reliable consensus nodes. Finally, based on these two improvements, a trust system for IoT based on Hyperledger Fabric is designed and implemented. Experimental results show that compared to traditional PBFT, IPBFT reduces latency and communication complexity by over 50%, making it more suitable for large-scale IoT trust management scenarios and providing a new technical approach for efficient and trustworthy collaboration in blockchain applications within the IoT.

Abstract Image

改进的物联网信任管理系统共识协议
随着物联网的快速发展,设备间的安全协作对传统的信任管理提出了更高的要求。区块链技术由于其去中心化和防篡改的特性,已成为构建可信物联网系统的有效解决方案。然而,传统的共识协议(如PBFT)面临着诸如高通信开销和物联网环境中可扩展性不足等问题。为此,提出了一种改进的共识协议——改进的实用拜占庭容错(IPBFT),该协议结合K-means优化节点分组,降低网络通信复杂度,同时引入动态信用评估机制,评估节点的可信度,过滤可靠的共识节点。最后,在这两个改进的基础上,设计并实现了一个基于Hyperledger Fabric的物联网信任系统。实验结果表明,与传统的PBFT相比,IPBFT将时延和通信复杂度降低了50%以上,更适合大规模物联网信任管理场景,为物联网内部区块链应用的高效可信协作提供了新的技术途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书