A Deep Learning Approach to Automated Bug Triaging: Investigating the Impact of Text Vectorization Methods on Effectiveness of CNN-LSTM

IF 1.6 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Ava Faghihi, Seyed Mostafa Fakhrahmad, Mohammad Hadi Sadreddini
{"title":"A Deep Learning Approach to Automated Bug Triaging: Investigating the Impact of Text Vectorization Methods on Effectiveness of CNN-LSTM","authors":"Ava Faghihi,&nbsp;Seyed Mostafa Fakhrahmad,&nbsp;Mohammad Hadi Sadreddini","doi":"10.1002/smr.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Manual bug triage is a significant bottleneck in modern software development, leading to costly project delays. While automated systems offer a solution, their performance is fundamentally tied to their ability to comprehend the semantic content of bug reports. The text representation methods that power these systems have evolved significantly, yet a systematic comparison to understand their true impact on triage accuracy has been lacking. This paper conducts a large-scale empirical study to fill this gap, comparing nine text vectorization methods—spanning from classical TF-IDF to state-of-the-art Sentence-Transformers (SBERT)—within a hybrid CNN-LSTM framework. We evaluate the models on six benchmark datasets from projects like Google Chromium and Mozilla. Performance is measured using Top-k accuracy, a standard metric for this recommendation-style task, which assesses whether the correct developer is ranked among the top predictions. Our findings reveal that sentence-level embeddings from SBERT consistently and significantly achieve the highest Top-k accuracy, outperforming all other techniques, including contextual models like BERT. Our SBERT-based model establishes a new state-of-the-art, demonstrating that a holistic, sentence-level semantic understanding is critical for effective bug-to-developer assignment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48898,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.70146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manual bug triage is a significant bottleneck in modern software development, leading to costly project delays. While automated systems offer a solution, their performance is fundamentally tied to their ability to comprehend the semantic content of bug reports. The text representation methods that power these systems have evolved significantly, yet a systematic comparison to understand their true impact on triage accuracy has been lacking. This paper conducts a large-scale empirical study to fill this gap, comparing nine text vectorization methods—spanning from classical TF-IDF to state-of-the-art Sentence-Transformers (SBERT)—within a hybrid CNN-LSTM framework. We evaluate the models on six benchmark datasets from projects like Google Chromium and Mozilla. Performance is measured using Top-k accuracy, a standard metric for this recommendation-style task, which assesses whether the correct developer is ranked among the top predictions. Our findings reveal that sentence-level embeddings from SBERT consistently and significantly achieve the highest Top-k accuracy, outperforming all other techniques, including contextual models like BERT. Our SBERT-based model establishes a new state-of-the-art, demonstrating that a holistic, sentence-level semantic understanding is critical for effective bug-to-developer assignment.

Abstract Image

基于深度学习的自动错误分类方法:研究文本矢量化方法对CNN-LSTM有效性的影响
手动错误分类是现代软件开发中的一个重要瓶颈,它会导致代价高昂的项目延迟。虽然自动化系统提供了一个解决方案,但它们的性能从根本上取决于它们理解错误报告的语义内容的能力。为这些系统提供动力的文本表示方法已经有了很大的发展,但是缺乏系统的比较来了解它们对分类准确性的真正影响。本文进行了一项大规模的实证研究来填补这一空白,在混合CNN-LSTM框架内比较了九种文本矢量化方法——从经典的TF-IDF到最先进的句子变形(SBERT)。我们在谷歌Chromium和Mozilla等项目的六个基准数据集上对模型进行了评估。性能是使用top -k准确度来衡量的,top -k准确度是这种推荐式任务的标准度量,它评估正确的开发人员是否在最佳预测中排名。我们的研究结果表明,来自SBERT的句子级嵌入一致且显著地实现了最高的Top-k准确率,优于所有其他技术,包括BERT等上下文模型。我们基于sbert的模型建立了一种新的技术,证明了一个整体的、句子级的语义理解对于有效的bug到开发人员的分配是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
自引率
10.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书