Using LiDAR to quantify, map, and conserve late-successional and old-growth forest in Maine, USA

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2026-06-04 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70670
John M. Hagan, Benjamin Shamgochian, Molly M. L. Taylor, J. Michael Reed
{"title":"Using LiDAR to quantify, map, and conserve late-successional and old-growth forest in Maine, USA","authors":"John M. Hagan,&nbsp;Benjamin Shamgochian,&nbsp;Molly M. L. Taylor,&nbsp;J. Michael Reed","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The world continues to lose late-successional and old-growth (LSOG) forest as the human population and demand for wood fiber grow. However, older forest age classes provide structural and compositional characteristics important to biodiversity that are often not present in forests managed for timber. LSOG forest conservation has been constrained by our inability to accurately and cost-effectively map it over large spatial scales. The advent of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) provides a potential solution to this problem. We used publicly available LiDAR to map LSOG forest for approximately 4.2 million ha of the unorganized territories of Maine, USA. We built a classification model using known-class forest types and eight canopy structure metrics derived from the LiDAR point cloud. The model was 93% accurate in distinguishing “Not LSOG” forest from three LSOG classes (transitioning late successional, late successional, and old growth). At a finer level, the model was also effective at distinguishing transitioning late successional from late-successional forest, but less effective at differentiating old growth from late-successional forest. We evaluated the amounts and rates of LSOG forest loss across landowner types, such as public lands, private commercial forests, and private conservation forests. Private commercial forest had the most LSOG forest of any owner type but it was losing it faster (−2.2%/year) than other owner types. Tens of thousands of distinct LSOG parcels were identified throughout the study area, the most common size between 1 and 5 ha. The advent of this precise, accurate, spatially explicit LSOG map is being used by conservation planners and facilitating a larger social conversation about how much LSOG to conserve and how it should be distributed across the landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70670","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The world continues to lose late-successional and old-growth (LSOG) forest as the human population and demand for wood fiber grow. However, older forest age classes provide structural and compositional characteristics important to biodiversity that are often not present in forests managed for timber. LSOG forest conservation has been constrained by our inability to accurately and cost-effectively map it over large spatial scales. The advent of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) provides a potential solution to this problem. We used publicly available LiDAR to map LSOG forest for approximately 4.2 million ha of the unorganized territories of Maine, USA. We built a classification model using known-class forest types and eight canopy structure metrics derived from the LiDAR point cloud. The model was 93% accurate in distinguishing “Not LSOG” forest from three LSOG classes (transitioning late successional, late successional, and old growth). At a finer level, the model was also effective at distinguishing transitioning late successional from late-successional forest, but less effective at differentiating old growth from late-successional forest. We evaluated the amounts and rates of LSOG forest loss across landowner types, such as public lands, private commercial forests, and private conservation forests. Private commercial forest had the most LSOG forest of any owner type but it was losing it faster (−2.2%/year) than other owner types. Tens of thousands of distinct LSOG parcels were identified throughout the study area, the most common size between 1 and 5 ha. The advent of this precise, accurate, spatially explicit LSOG map is being used by conservation planners and facilitating a larger social conversation about how much LSOG to conserve and how it should be distributed across the landscape.

Abstract Image

利用激光雷达对美国缅因州晚演替和原始森林进行量化、制图和保护
随着人口和对木材纤维需求的增长,世界继续失去晚演替和原始森林。然而,较老的林龄等级提供了对生物多样性重要的结构和组成特征,而这些特征在木材经营的森林中往往不存在。由于我们无法在大空间尺度上准确和经济有效地绘制LSOG森林保护地图,LSOG森林保护受到了限制。光探测和测距(LiDAR)的出现为这个问题提供了一个潜在的解决方案。我们使用公开可用的激光雷达绘制了美国缅因州大约420万公顷的非组织领土的LSOG森林。我们利用LiDAR点云的已知森林类型和8个冠层结构指标建立了分类模型。该模型在区分“非LSOG”森林和3种LSOG类别(晚期演替过渡、晚期演替和老生长)方面的准确率为93%。在更精细的水平上,该模型也能有效区分过渡性晚演替林和晚演替林,但在区分老森林和晚演替林方面效果较差。我们评估了不同土地所有者类型(如公共土地、私人商业森林和私人保护森林)的LSOG森林损失的数量和速率。在所有所有者类型中,私人商业林的LSOG最多,但其损失速度比其他所有者类型快(- 2.2%/年)。在整个研究区域确定了成千上万个不同的LSOG地块,最常见的大小在1到5公顷之间。这种精确、准确、空间明确的LSOG地图的出现正在被保护规划者使用,并促进了关于LSOG应该保护多少以及它应该如何在景观中分布的更大的社会讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书