Methane Emissions Offsetting With Temporary Carbon Sinks

IF 4.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Hans-Peter Schmidt, Nikolas Hagemann
{"title":"Methane Emissions Offsetting With Temporary Carbon Sinks","authors":"Hans-Peter Schmidt,&nbsp;Nikolas Hagemann","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Methane accounts for more than 20% of current anthropogenic warming. While fossil methane emissions can likely be reduced substantially, biogenic methane from agriculture and waste will remain difficult to fully abate. Achieving climate neutrality therefore requires counterbalancing the warming effect of residual emissions. The rapid atmospheric decay of methane suggests that temporary carbon sinks can serve this purpose, yet current accounting approaches do not consistently quantify their time-dependent cooling effect. Here we develop a time-explicit method that enables offsetting the 100-year warming impact of a methane emission pulse with an equally sized cooling effect delivered by carbon dioxide removal over 20 years. Based on a CO<sub>2</sub> atmospheric impulse–response function (IRF), we define the total climate effect (TCE) as time-integrated warming and cooling of greenhouse gas emissions and dynamic carbon sinks expressed in CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent units. The developed method yields the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> removal and storage duration over a chosen time horizon to counterbalance methane-induced warming. For example, over a 20-year horizon, complete offsetting of 1 t CH<sub>4</sub> of biogenic origin requires 94.6 t CO<sub>2</sub>e stored in a constant C-sink. The method allows differentiation between temporary and geologically persistent carbon dioxide removal by explicitly accounting for storage duration and time horizon. By providing a physically grounded basis for valuing temporary carbon storage—a question actively debated in the EU Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Regulation and Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement—the approach supports near-term climate mitigation and may bridge the decades required for scaling permanent CDR solutions by creating financial incentives for temporary carbon sink technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70143","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methane accounts for more than 20% of current anthropogenic warming. While fossil methane emissions can likely be reduced substantially, biogenic methane from agriculture and waste will remain difficult to fully abate. Achieving climate neutrality therefore requires counterbalancing the warming effect of residual emissions. The rapid atmospheric decay of methane suggests that temporary carbon sinks can serve this purpose, yet current accounting approaches do not consistently quantify their time-dependent cooling effect. Here we develop a time-explicit method that enables offsetting the 100-year warming impact of a methane emission pulse with an equally sized cooling effect delivered by carbon dioxide removal over 20 years. Based on a CO2 atmospheric impulse–response function (IRF), we define the total climate effect (TCE) as time-integrated warming and cooling of greenhouse gas emissions and dynamic carbon sinks expressed in CO2-equivalent units. The developed method yields the amount of CO2 removal and storage duration over a chosen time horizon to counterbalance methane-induced warming. For example, over a 20-year horizon, complete offsetting of 1 t CH4 of biogenic origin requires 94.6 t CO2e stored in a constant C-sink. The method allows differentiation between temporary and geologically persistent carbon dioxide removal by explicitly accounting for storage duration and time horizon. By providing a physically grounded basis for valuing temporary carbon storage—a question actively debated in the EU Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Regulation and Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement—the approach supports near-term climate mitigation and may bridge the decades required for scaling permanent CDR solutions by creating financial incentives for temporary carbon sink technologies.

Abstract Image

用临时碳汇抵消甲烷排放
甲烷占目前人为变暖的20%以上。虽然化石甲烷的排放可能会大幅减少,但农业和废物产生的生物甲烷仍将难以完全减少。因此,实现气候中和需要抵消残余排放的变暖效应。大气中甲烷的快速衰变表明,暂时的碳汇可以达到这一目的,但目前的计算方法并不能始终如一地量化它们随时间变化的冷却效果。在这里,我们开发了一种时间明确的方法,可以抵消甲烷排放脉冲100年的变暖影响,并在20年内通过二氧化碳去除产生同等大小的冷却效果。基于CO2大气脉冲响应函数(IRF),我们将总气候效应(TCE)定义为以CO2当量单位表示的温室气体排放和动态碳汇的时间积分增温和降温。所开发的方法可以在选定的时间范围内产生二氧化碳的去除量和储存时间,以抵消甲烷引起的变暖。例如,在20年的时间跨度内,完全抵消1吨生物源CH4需要在一个恒定的碳汇中储存94.6吨二氧化碳当量。该方法通过明确计算储存时间和时间范围,区分了暂时和地质上持久的二氧化碳去除。通过为评估临时碳储存(这是欧盟碳清除和碳种植条例和《巴黎协定》第6.4条中积极讨论的问题)提供一个物理基础,该方法支持短期气候减缓,并可能通过为临时碳汇技术创造财政激励,弥合扩大永久性碳储存解决方案所需的数十年时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书