Development and Behavioral Validation of the Dark Creativity Deception Battery (DCDB)

IF 4.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Hansika Kapoor, Sarah Rezaei, Apoorva Thakur, Tithi Roy, Corinna M. Perchtold-Stefan, James C. Kaufman
{"title":"Development and Behavioral Validation of the Dark Creativity Deception Battery (DCDB)","authors":"Hansika Kapoor,&nbsp;Sarah Rezaei,&nbsp;Apoorva Thakur,&nbsp;Tithi Roy,&nbsp;Corinna M. Perchtold-Stefan,&nbsp;James C. Kaufman","doi":"10.1002/jocb.70122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Although creativity is commonly associated with positive outcomes, emerging research has highlighted its darker side, particularly in facilitating deceptive and unethical behavior. This study introduces the Dark Creativity Deception Battery (DCDB), a novel task-based assessment designed to measure creative deception across prosocial, self-serving, and antisocial contexts. Participants (<i>N</i> = 755) were recruited from India, USA, and Austria. They completed several self-report measures and some deception tasks in which they generated novel and deceptive ways to address vignettes. Responses were assessed across seven parameters: creativity, moral valence, goal-directedness, deception, virtue caveat, fluency, and flexibility. Results indicated that younger individuals, lower moral disengagement, and higher negative affect were associated with creative responses in prosocial contexts. In contrast, higher trait deceptiveness and lower income were associated with self-serving and antisocial lies. Moral valence varied across tasks, with prosocial deception rated most positively. Interestingly, high psychopathy was associated with moral justifiability in self-serving deception. Deception itself was highest in antisocial and self-serving contexts, coupled with high individualizing morality, suggesting moral licensing effects. Our findings highlight the interplay between morality, personality, and creativity in deceptive behavior. The DCDB offers a new way to study creative deception beyond traditional measures. Limitations and future scope are discussed.</p>\n <p><b>Pre-Registration:</b> The study was pre-registered on OSF: https://osf.io/drhw7/</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although creativity is commonly associated with positive outcomes, emerging research has highlighted its darker side, particularly in facilitating deceptive and unethical behavior. This study introduces the Dark Creativity Deception Battery (DCDB), a novel task-based assessment designed to measure creative deception across prosocial, self-serving, and antisocial contexts. Participants (N = 755) were recruited from India, USA, and Austria. They completed several self-report measures and some deception tasks in which they generated novel and deceptive ways to address vignettes. Responses were assessed across seven parameters: creativity, moral valence, goal-directedness, deception, virtue caveat, fluency, and flexibility. Results indicated that younger individuals, lower moral disengagement, and higher negative affect were associated with creative responses in prosocial contexts. In contrast, higher trait deceptiveness and lower income were associated with self-serving and antisocial lies. Moral valence varied across tasks, with prosocial deception rated most positively. Interestingly, high psychopathy was associated with moral justifiability in self-serving deception. Deception itself was highest in antisocial and self-serving contexts, coupled with high individualizing morality, suggesting moral licensing effects. Our findings highlight the interplay between morality, personality, and creativity in deceptive behavior. The DCDB offers a new way to study creative deception beyond traditional measures. Limitations and future scope are discussed.

Pre-Registration: The study was pre-registered on OSF: https://osf.io/drhw7/

黑暗创造力欺骗电池(DCDB)的开发与行为验证
虽然创造力通常与积极的结果联系在一起,但新兴研究强调了它的阴暗面,特别是在促进欺骗和不道德行为方面。本研究介绍了一种新的基于任务的评估方法——黑暗创造力欺骗测试(DCDB),旨在测量亲社会、自私自利和反社会背景下的创造性欺骗。参与者(N = 755)从印度、美国和奥地利招募。他们完成了几个自我报告测试和一些欺骗任务,在这些任务中,他们想出了新颖的欺骗方法来解决小插曲。回答通过七个参数进行评估:创造力、道德效价、目标导向、欺骗、美德警告、流畅性和灵活性。结果表明,较年轻的个体、较低的道德脱离和较高的负面情绪与亲社会情境下的创造性反应相关。相反,较高的特质欺骗和较低的收入与自私自利和反社会的谎言有关。不同任务的道德效价不同,亲社会欺骗的评价最高。有趣的是,在自私自利的欺骗中,高度精神病态与道德正当性有关。在反社会和自私自利的情况下,欺骗本身是最高的,再加上高度个性化的道德,表明道德许可效应。我们的发现强调了道德、个性和创造力在欺骗行为中的相互作用。ddcb为研究创造性欺骗提供了一种超越传统方法的新方法。讨论了其局限性和未来的应用范围。预注册:本研究已在OSF上预注册:https://osf.io/drhw7/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书