Artificial intelligence-powered hybrid probability density prediction for ultra-short-term offshore wind power: A model integrating TVFEMD, R2CMSE, and MCQRNNG

IF 13.5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Energy Economics Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-25 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109413
Haiying Liu , Ming Yang
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-powered hybrid probability density prediction for ultra-short-term offshore wind power: A model integrating TVFEMD, R2CMSE, and MCQRNNG","authors":"Haiying Liu ,&nbsp;Ming Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The volatility of offshore wind power poses challenges for grid stability, necessitating reliable uncertainty quantification beyond deterministic forecasts. We propose a TRMG model that integrates time-varying filter empirical mode decomposition (TVFEMD), rapid refined composite multi-timescale entropy (R2CMSE), and an AI-based monotonic composite quantile regression neural network (QRNN) with Gaussian kernel estimation (MCQRNNG) for probabilistic prediction. Experiments conducted on TenneT offshore wind data demonstrated the TRMG’s strategic emphasis on uncertainty metrics over point accuracy. Compared to the EMD-based hybrid ERMG, TRMG reduces interval width by 53.846% (prediction interval normalized averaged width (PINAW): 0.036 vs. 0.078) and probabilistic error by 29.062% (pinball loss: 29.745 vs. 41.931 MW). Compared with the sample-entropy-based TSMG model, TRMG achieved superior coverage (prediction interval coverage probability: 0.841 vs. 0.403), 25.000% narrower intervals (PINAW: 0.036 vs. 0.048), and 70.555% lower distributional errors (pinball loss: 29.745 vs. 101.018 MW). Notably, when compared with the unconstrained quantile model TRQG with identical inputs, TRMG delivered 82.439% tighter intervals (PINAW: 0.036 vs. 0.205) through the monotonicity constraints of the MCQRNN, eliminated quantile crossing (0.000 vs. 0.510 MW for the two-layer QRNN), and provided the narrowest prediction bounds in the industry. The TRMG equips grid operators with decision-ready uncertainty estimates, which are essential for renewable integration and energy-security planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 109413"},"PeriodicalIF":13.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988326002926","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The volatility of offshore wind power poses challenges for grid stability, necessitating reliable uncertainty quantification beyond deterministic forecasts. We propose a TRMG model that integrates time-varying filter empirical mode decomposition (TVFEMD), rapid refined composite multi-timescale entropy (R2CMSE), and an AI-based monotonic composite quantile regression neural network (QRNN) with Gaussian kernel estimation (MCQRNNG) for probabilistic prediction. Experiments conducted on TenneT offshore wind data demonstrated the TRMG’s strategic emphasis on uncertainty metrics over point accuracy. Compared to the EMD-based hybrid ERMG, TRMG reduces interval width by 53.846% (prediction interval normalized averaged width (PINAW): 0.036 vs. 0.078) and probabilistic error by 29.062% (pinball loss: 29.745 vs. 41.931 MW). Compared with the sample-entropy-based TSMG model, TRMG achieved superior coverage (prediction interval coverage probability: 0.841 vs. 0.403), 25.000% narrower intervals (PINAW: 0.036 vs. 0.048), and 70.555% lower distributional errors (pinball loss: 29.745 vs. 101.018 MW). Notably, when compared with the unconstrained quantile model TRQG with identical inputs, TRMG delivered 82.439% tighter intervals (PINAW: 0.036 vs. 0.205) through the monotonicity constraints of the MCQRNN, eliminated quantile crossing (0.000 vs. 0.510 MW for the two-layer QRNN), and provided the narrowest prediction bounds in the industry. The TRMG equips grid operators with decision-ready uncertainty estimates, which are essential for renewable integration and energy-security planning.

Abstract Image

人工智能驱动的超短期海上风电混合概率密度预测:一个集成TVFEMD、R2CMSE和MCQRNNG的模型
海上风电的波动性对电网的稳定性提出了挑战,需要在确定性预测之外进行可靠的不确定性量化。我们提出了一种TRMG模型,该模型集成了时变滤波经验模态分解(TVFEMD)、快速精细复合多时间尺度熵(R2CMSE)和基于人工智能的单调复合分位数回归神经网络(QRNN)和高斯核估计(MCQRNNG)进行概率预测。在TenneT海上风电数据上进行的实验表明,TRMG的战略重点是不确定性指标而不是点精度。与基于emd的混合ERMG相比,TRMG将区间宽度减少了53.846%(预测区间归一化平均宽度(PINAW): 0.036 vs. 0.078),概率误差减少了29.062%(弹球损失:29.745 vs. 41.931 MW)。与基于样本熵的TSMG模型相比,TRMG模型的覆盖率更高(预测区间覆盖概率:0.841 vs. 0.403),区间更窄25.000% (PINAW: 0.036 vs. 0.048),分布误差降低70.555%(弹球损失:29.745 vs. 101.018 MW)。值得注意的是,与具有相同输入的无约束分位数模型TRQG相比,TRMG通过MCQRNN的单调性约束提供了82.439%的更紧区间(PINAW: 0.036 vs. 0.205),消除了分位数交叉(两层QRNN为0.000 vs. 0.510 MW),并提供了业内最窄的预测界限。TRMG为电网运营商提供决策准备的不确定性评估,这对可再生能源整合和能源安全规划至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书