Co-producing nature-based solution scenarios to improve water, flood and heat resilience in Ghana's informal settlements

IF 4
Nature-Based Solutions Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.nbsj.2026.100342
Dorothy Julian Nalumu , Owusu Amponsah , Stephen Appiah Takyi , Sergio Altomonte , Elisabetta Rosa
{"title":"Co-producing nature-based solution scenarios to improve water, flood and heat resilience in Ghana's informal settlements","authors":"Dorothy Julian Nalumu ,&nbsp;Owusu Amponsah ,&nbsp;Stephen Appiah Takyi ,&nbsp;Sergio Altomonte ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Rosa","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2026.100342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Informal settlements in rapidly urbanising African cities continue to face serious social-ecological challenges that affect residents’ well-being and place pressure on local resource systems. Although nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly recognised as promising approaches for improving sustainability in such marginalised areas, there is still limited empirical evidence on their local relevance, feasibility, and community acceptance. This study examined four questions in Dakodwom informal settlement in Kumasi, Ghana: the main social-ecological challenges in the community, the preferred NBS scenarios, the implementation challenges linked to those scenarios, and the possible ways to overcome them. A qualitative case study approach was adopted, using key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observation. The findings show that water scarcity, flooding, and heat stress are the main social-ecological challenges affecting the community. The study further found that underground rainwater harvesting, planting lemon grass along stream banks, and community biogas were the most potential NBS scenarios. These options were preferred because of their perceived collective benefits, their ability to improve everyday provisioning systems, and their connection with existing livelihood practices. However, important barriers to implementation were identified, including technical and cultural concerns, land and space constraints, and weak institutional support at the local government level. To address these challenges, the study suggests hybrid solutions, pilot projects, and stronger local knowledge production and governance support. Taking this case study as an example, the findings provide useful insights for developing more context-responsive and socially grounded NBS approaches in similar informal settlements across comparable urban settings in Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100342"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277241152600042X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Informal settlements in rapidly urbanising African cities continue to face serious social-ecological challenges that affect residents’ well-being and place pressure on local resource systems. Although nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly recognised as promising approaches for improving sustainability in such marginalised areas, there is still limited empirical evidence on their local relevance, feasibility, and community acceptance. This study examined four questions in Dakodwom informal settlement in Kumasi, Ghana: the main social-ecological challenges in the community, the preferred NBS scenarios, the implementation challenges linked to those scenarios, and the possible ways to overcome them. A qualitative case study approach was adopted, using key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observation. The findings show that water scarcity, flooding, and heat stress are the main social-ecological challenges affecting the community. The study further found that underground rainwater harvesting, planting lemon grass along stream banks, and community biogas were the most potential NBS scenarios. These options were preferred because of their perceived collective benefits, their ability to improve everyday provisioning systems, and their connection with existing livelihood practices. However, important barriers to implementation were identified, including technical and cultural concerns, land and space constraints, and weak institutional support at the local government level. To address these challenges, the study suggests hybrid solutions, pilot projects, and stronger local knowledge production and governance support. Taking this case study as an example, the findings provide useful insights for developing more context-responsive and socially grounded NBS approaches in similar informal settlements across comparable urban settings in Africa.
共同制定基于自然的解决方案方案,以改善加纳非正式住区的水、洪水和热恢复能力
快速城市化的非洲城市中的非正式住区继续面临严重的社会生态挑战,影响居民的福祉并给当地资源系统带来压力。尽管基于自然的解决方案(NBS)越来越被认为是改善这些边缘化地区可持续性的有希望的方法,但关于其当地相关性、可行性和社区接受度的经验证据仍然有限。本研究考察了加纳库马西的Dakodwom非正式定居点的四个问题:社区中的主要社会生态挑战、首选的国家统计局情景、与这些情景相关的实施挑战以及克服这些挑战的可能方法。采用了定性案例研究的方法,包括关键信息提供者访谈、焦点小组讨论和实地观察。研究结果表明,水资源短缺、洪水和热应激是影响社区的主要社会生态挑战。该研究进一步发现,地下雨水收集、沿河岸种植柠檬草和社区沼气是最有可能的NBS方案。这些选择之所以受到青睐,是因为它们可以带来集体利益、改善日常供应系统的能力以及与现有生计实践的联系。但是,确定了执行的重要障碍,包括技术和文化问题、土地和空间限制以及地方政府一级薄弱的体制支持。为了应对这些挑战,该研究建议采用混合解决方案、试点项目以及加强地方知识生产和治理支持。以本案例研究为例,研究结果为在非洲可比城市环境中的类似非正式住区中制定更具情境响应性和基于社会的国家统计局方法提供了有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书