{"title":"Social protection or economic participation? Examining drivers of Ukrainian refugees' integration in Europe","authors":"Vita Krol , Halyna Mishchuk , Yuriy Bilan","doi":"10.1016/j.resglo.2026.100367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The unprecedented wave of Ukrainian refugees caused by the war placed the problem of refugee integration at the centre of demographic policy and scholarly debates. Therefore, there is a growing need to examine interconnections among economic participation, social inclusion, and access to social protection, which are commonly treated as dimensions of integration. This study examines the appropriate interplay among Ukrainian refugees across ten European host countries using aggregated 2024 data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Composite indices in each direction are developed to capture the integration dimensions, and their relationships are assessed using correlation and regression analyses, as well as typological comparisons. The findings indicate a strong positive association between economic integration and social protection (Pearson's <em>r</em> = 0.812, <em>p</em> < 0.01). In contrast, social integration shows no statistically significant association with either economic participation (<em>r</em> = −0.486, <em>p</em> = 0.155) or welfare engagement (<em>r</em> = −0.150, <em>p</em> = 0.680), suggesting that this dimension may operate independently of the other two at the country level. The typology of hosting countries, based on comparisons of economic integration and social protection indices, identifies four distinct integration types shaped by national institutional contexts. It is found that the “high-integration - high-protection” model prevails in half of the observed countries, in contrast to a low-capacity type of refugees' inclusion characterized by deficits in both economic inclusion and welfare access. The results do not support the assumption that reliance on welfare undermines labour market integration; rather, the macro-level data suggest that access to social protection co-occurs with higher economic participation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34321,"journal":{"name":"Research in Globalization","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100367"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Globalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X26000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The unprecedented wave of Ukrainian refugees caused by the war placed the problem of refugee integration at the centre of demographic policy and scholarly debates. Therefore, there is a growing need to examine interconnections among economic participation, social inclusion, and access to social protection, which are commonly treated as dimensions of integration. This study examines the appropriate interplay among Ukrainian refugees across ten European host countries using aggregated 2024 data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Composite indices in each direction are developed to capture the integration dimensions, and their relationships are assessed using correlation and regression analyses, as well as typological comparisons. The findings indicate a strong positive association between economic integration and social protection (Pearson's r = 0.812, p < 0.01). In contrast, social integration shows no statistically significant association with either economic participation (r = −0.486, p = 0.155) or welfare engagement (r = −0.150, p = 0.680), suggesting that this dimension may operate independently of the other two at the country level. The typology of hosting countries, based on comparisons of economic integration and social protection indices, identifies four distinct integration types shaped by national institutional contexts. It is found that the “high-integration - high-protection” model prevails in half of the observed countries, in contrast to a low-capacity type of refugees' inclusion characterized by deficits in both economic inclusion and welfare access. The results do not support the assumption that reliance on welfare undermines labour market integration; rather, the macro-level data suggest that access to social protection co-occurs with higher economic participation.
战争造成的空前的乌克兰难民潮使难民融入社会问题成为人口政策和学术辩论的中心问题。因此,越来越需要审查经济参与、社会包容和获得社会保护之间的相互联系,这些通常被视为一体化的维度。本研究使用联合国难民事务高级专员公署的2024年汇总数据,考察了10个欧洲东道国乌克兰难民之间的适当相互作用。在每个方向上建立了复合指数来捕捉整合维度,并使用相关和回归分析以及类型比较来评估它们之间的关系。研究结果表明,经济一体化与社会保护之间存在很强的正相关关系(Pearson’s r = 0.812, p < 0.01)。相比之下,社会整合与经济参与(r = - 0.486, p = 0.155)或福利参与(r = - 0.150, p = 0.680)没有统计学上的显著关联,这表明这一维度在国家层面上可能独立于其他两个维度。在比较经济一体化和社会保护指数的基础上,东道国的类型确定了由国家体制背景形成的四种不同的一体化类型。研究发现,“高融合-高保护”模式在一半的观察国家中普遍存在,与此形成鲜明对比的是低能力类型的难民包容,其特征是在经济包容和福利获取方面都存在缺陷。研究结果不支持依赖福利会破坏劳动力市场一体化的假设;相反,宏观层面的数据表明,获得社会保护与更高的经济参与度是同步发生的。