Effectiveness of psychological interventions for reducing depressive symptoms among women experiencing perinatal depression: a systematic review

IF 2.7
AJOG global reports Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.xagr.2026.100654
Abdissa Boka MSc , Debela Gela MSc , Jembere Tesfaye MSc
{"title":"Effectiveness of psychological interventions for reducing depressive symptoms among women experiencing perinatal depression: a systematic review","authors":"Abdissa Boka MSc ,&nbsp;Debela Gela MSc ,&nbsp;Jembere Tesfaye MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2026.100654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Psychological interventions are well established as effective treatments for perinatal depression, with strong evidence supported by randomized controlled trials carried out in diverse cultural contexts and in settings with limited resources. Approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapy, problem-solving therapy, interpersonal therapy, and community based models that rely on task-sharing have repeatedly shown meaningful reductions in depressive symptoms and notable improvements in maternal functioning and overall well-being. These interventions are especially important in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) where access to specialist mental health professionals is seriously limited. Evidence demonstrating that appropriately trained non-specialist including community health workers (CHW), Peers, and lay counselors can successfully deliver this intervention within primary health care and community platforms highlighting their practicality and effectiveness. Consequently, task-sharing strategies are therefore considered a promising and sustainable approach for reducing the treatment gap for perinatal depression in resource-constrained contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing depressive symptoms among women experiencing perinatal depression in low and middle income countries.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Studies were eligible if they evaluated task-shared or lay-delivered psychological interventions for perinatal depression among pregnant or postpartum women aged 18 years and older in LMICs. Only randomized controlled trials or cluster randomized controlled trials were included. Participants were required to have screened positive for depressive symptoms or to have been diagnosed with major depressive disorder using validated screening or diagnostic instruments. Studies that solely addressed severe mental illness necessitating inpatient psychiatric treatment lacked a comparison group or did not report outcomes related to depression were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and information sources</h3><div>Major electronic databases commonly utilized in health research were thoroughly and systematically searched, with the most recent search conducted in Month/Year. Only studies published in English were considered. The study selection was carried out in staged manner according to predetermined eligibility criteria, with independent review of titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were evaluated using standardized appraisal tools and relevant data were collected using a structured and piloted data extraction form. Due to substantial heterogeneity in intervention content, delivery modes, settings, and outcome measures, a narrative synthesis was undertaken rather than a meta-analysis. The level of confidence in the evidence for the main outcomes was evaluated, and no substantial deviations from the predetermined methodological plan were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising ten randomized controlled trials and one formative mixed-methods study, with a total sample of <strong>4809</strong> perinatal women from Pakistan, South Africa, and Tanzania. Interventions primarily involved task-shared psychological therapies delivered by peers, community health workers, or lay counsellors, often based on cognitive behavioral or problem-solving principles. Study quality was mixed, with generally low risk of bias in well-conducted trials but important limitations related to heterogeneity of outcome measures, limited reporting on cost-effectiveness, and incomplete effectiveness data in formative and protocol-based studies. Technology-assisted, peer-delivered interventions demonstrated similar or greater reductions in depressive symptoms and higher remission rates compared with standard care. Conversely, certain task-shared interventions did not demonstrate a statistically meaningful advantage when compared with enhanced usual care. Overall, the certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate across outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Task-shared psychological interventions for perinatal depression appear feasible and acceptable in low-resource settings. From the review findings the availability of technology assisted interventions that delivered by peers can achieve similar clinical outcomes that comparable to interventions delivered by mental health professionals. Nevertheless, both effectiveness and cost-efficiency differ depending on context, level and intervention intensity, as well as the capacity of health system in which they are implemented. Additional rigorously designed studies, incorporating standardized outcome measures, extended follow-up durations, and comprehensive economic evaluations are needed to reinforce the existing evidence and to inform policy decisions and large-scale implementation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>PROSPERO, CRD420261285318.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577826000523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psychological interventions are well established as effective treatments for perinatal depression, with strong evidence supported by randomized controlled trials carried out in diverse cultural contexts and in settings with limited resources. Approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapy, problem-solving therapy, interpersonal therapy, and community based models that rely on task-sharing have repeatedly shown meaningful reductions in depressive symptoms and notable improvements in maternal functioning and overall well-being. These interventions are especially important in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) where access to specialist mental health professionals is seriously limited. Evidence demonstrating that appropriately trained non-specialist including community health workers (CHW), Peers, and lay counselors can successfully deliver this intervention within primary health care and community platforms highlighting their practicality and effectiveness. Consequently, task-sharing strategies are therefore considered a promising and sustainable approach for reducing the treatment gap for perinatal depression in resource-constrained contexts.

Objective

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing depressive symptoms among women experiencing perinatal depression in low and middle income countries.

Study Design

Studies were eligible if they evaluated task-shared or lay-delivered psychological interventions for perinatal depression among pregnant or postpartum women aged 18 years and older in LMICs. Only randomized controlled trials or cluster randomized controlled trials were included. Participants were required to have screened positive for depressive symptoms or to have been diagnosed with major depressive disorder using validated screening or diagnostic instruments. Studies that solely addressed severe mental illness necessitating inpatient psychiatric treatment lacked a comparison group or did not report outcomes related to depression were excluded.

Methods and information sources

Major electronic databases commonly utilized in health research were thoroughly and systematically searched, with the most recent search conducted in Month/Year. Only studies published in English were considered. The study selection was carried out in staged manner according to predetermined eligibility criteria, with independent review of titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were evaluated using standardized appraisal tools and relevant data were collected using a structured and piloted data extraction form. Due to substantial heterogeneity in intervention content, delivery modes, settings, and outcome measures, a narrative synthesis was undertaken rather than a meta-analysis. The level of confidence in the evidence for the main outcomes was evaluated, and no substantial deviations from the predetermined methodological plan were observed.

Results

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising ten randomized controlled trials and one formative mixed-methods study, with a total sample of 4809 perinatal women from Pakistan, South Africa, and Tanzania. Interventions primarily involved task-shared psychological therapies delivered by peers, community health workers, or lay counsellors, often based on cognitive behavioral or problem-solving principles. Study quality was mixed, with generally low risk of bias in well-conducted trials but important limitations related to heterogeneity of outcome measures, limited reporting on cost-effectiveness, and incomplete effectiveness data in formative and protocol-based studies. Technology-assisted, peer-delivered interventions demonstrated similar or greater reductions in depressive symptoms and higher remission rates compared with standard care. Conversely, certain task-shared interventions did not demonstrate a statistically meaningful advantage when compared with enhanced usual care. Overall, the certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate across outcomes.

Conclusion

Task-shared psychological interventions for perinatal depression appear feasible and acceptable in low-resource settings. From the review findings the availability of technology assisted interventions that delivered by peers can achieve similar clinical outcomes that comparable to interventions delivered by mental health professionals. Nevertheless, both effectiveness and cost-efficiency differ depending on context, level and intervention intensity, as well as the capacity of health system in which they are implemented. Additional rigorously designed studies, incorporating standardized outcome measures, extended follow-up durations, and comprehensive economic evaluations are needed to reinforce the existing evidence and to inform policy decisions and large-scale implementation strategies.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, CRD420261285318.
心理干预减轻围产期抑郁症妇女抑郁症状的有效性:一项系统综述
心理干预是围产期抑郁症的有效治疗方法,在不同文化背景和资源有限的环境中进行的随机对照试验提供了强有力的证据支持。诸如认知行为疗法、问题解决疗法、人际治疗和基于社区的模式等依赖于任务分担的方法一再显示出抑郁症状的显著减少,以及孕产妇功能和整体幸福感的显著改善。这些干预措施在低收入和中等收入国家尤其重要,因为这些国家获得专业精神卫生专业人员的机会严重有限。有证据表明,经过适当培训的非专业人员,包括社区卫生工作者(CHW)、同伴和非专业咨询师,可以在初级卫生保健和社区平台内成功地提供这种干预措施,突出了其实用性和有效性。因此,任务分担策略被认为是在资源有限的情况下减少围产期抑郁症治疗差距的一种有希望和可持续的方法。目的:本系统综述旨在评估心理干预在减少中低收入国家围产期抑郁症妇女抑郁症状中的有效性。研究设计:如果研究评估了中低收入国家18岁及以上孕妇或产后妇女围产期抑郁症的任务分担或分层心理干预,则该研究是合格的。仅纳入随机对照试验或聚类随机对照试验。参与者被要求在抑郁症状的筛查中呈阳性,或者通过有效的筛查或诊断工具被诊断为重度抑郁症。仅针对需要住院精神病治疗的严重精神疾病的研究缺乏对照组或未报告与抑郁症相关的结果被排除在外。方法和信息来源对卫生研究常用的主要电子数据库进行全面、系统的检索,最近一次检索以月/年为单位。只考虑了用英语发表的研究。研究选择按照预先确定的资格标准分阶段进行,并对标题、摘要和全文文章进行独立审查。采用标准化评价工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险,并使用结构化和试点数据提取表收集相关数据。由于干预内容、交付模式、环境和结果测量存在很大的异质性,因此采用叙事综合而不是荟萃分析。评估了主要结果证据的可信度,未观察到与预定方法计划有实质性偏差。结果6项研究符合纳入标准,包括10项随机对照试验和1项形成性混合方法研究,共纳入来自巴基斯坦、南非和坦桑尼亚的4809名围产期妇女。干预措施主要涉及由同伴、社区卫生工作者或非专业咨询师提供的任务共享心理治疗,通常基于认知行为或解决问题的原则。研究质量参差不齐,在执行良好的试验中偏倚风险一般较低,但重要的局限性与结果测量的异质性、有限的成本效益报告以及形成性研究和基于方案的研究中不完整的有效性数据有关。与标准治疗相比,技术辅助、同伴提供的干预显示出相似或更大程度的抑郁症状减轻和更高的缓解率。相反,与增强的常规护理相比,某些任务共享干预没有显示出统计学上有意义的优势。总体而言,证据的确定性从低到中等不等。结论在资源匮乏的环境下,任务分担型心理干预对围产期抑郁症是可行和可接受的。从审查结果来看,同伴提供的技术辅助干预措施的可用性可以达到与精神卫生专业人员提供的干预措施相似的临床结果。然而,有效性和成本效益因环境、水平和干预强度以及实施这些措施的卫生系统的能力而异。需要进一步严格设计研究,纳入标准化的结果衡量标准、延长随访时间和全面的经济评价,以加强现有证据,并为政策决定和大规模实施战略提供信息。系统评价注册号prospero, CRD420261285318。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书